Re: [Softwires] DHCPv6 section of the 4rd draft

2012-07-27 Thread Tomek Mrugalski
On 24.07.2012 15:10, Rémi Després wrote: Hi, Tomek, Hi Remi. hi all, Since you are the known DHCP expert in Softwire concerning stateless Thank you for your kind words. I just know DHCPv6 a bit, but I definitely don't consider myself an expert in stateless solutions. solutions, could you

Re: [Softwires] DHCPv6 section of the 4rd draft

2012-07-27 Thread Rémi Després
Le 2012-07-27 à 16:55, Tomek Mrugalski a écrit : On 24.07.2012 15:10, Rémi Després wrote: Hi, Tomek, Hi Remi. hi all, Since you are the known DHCP expert in Softwire concerning stateless Thank you for your kind words. I just know DHCPv6 a bit, but I definitely don't consider myself an

[Softwires] DHCPv6 section of the 4rd draft

2012-07-24 Thread Rémi Després
Hi, Tomek, Since you are the known DHCP expert in Softwire concerning stateless solutions, could you kindly review section 4.8 of the 4rd-03 draft, and comment on the ML its use of DHCPv6? (Doing so, of course, will not prejudge what the WG will decide concerning MAP-T+E vs 4rd.) In