Hi Remi,
Please see inline.
7. in example a in section 6, how come a mapping rule responding to 2
cpe ipv6 prefix length? cpe will get confused when it did forwarding.
CPE prefix lengths may be different. (It is the Domain prefix length that is
given in the rule.)
This is key to be able
Hi Washam,
Please see below.
Le 21 août 2011 à 08:01, Washam Fan a écrit :
Hi Remi,
Please see inline.
7. in example a in section 6, how come a mapping rule responding to 2
cpe ipv6 prefix length? cpe will get confused when it did forwarding.
CPE prefix lengths may be different. (It
Got it. Thanks Remi.
washam
2011/8/21 Rémi Després despres.r...@laposte.net:
Hi Washam,
Please see below.
Le 21 août 2011 à 08:01, Washam Fan a écrit :
Hi Remi,
Please see inline.
7. in example a in section 6, how come a mapping rule responding to 2
cpe ipv6 prefix length? cpe will
On Aug 20, 2011, at 9:04 AM, Rémi Després wrote:
Le 20 août 2011 à 11:46, Mark Townsley a écrit :
On Aug 20, 2011, at 3:20 AM, Rémi Després wrote:
Le 20 août 2011 à 03:55, Mark Townsley a écrit :
...
we're already confused:
Hi Tina,
On 2011-08-21 14:08, Tina TSOU wrote:
...
If an average IPv4 user is consuming 200 ports (or whatever
value you prefer to assume) with their favourite p2p app, that
is what sets the number of IPv4 users per shared address. It's
the number of simultaneous ports, not the amount of
-Original Message-
From: softwires-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:softwires-boun...@ietf.org] On
Behalf Of Yong Cui
Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2011 10:21 PM
To: softwires@ietf.org
Cc: Yong Cui
Subject: [Softwires] New working group documents
Hi folks,
Following our rough concensus
Support the adoption for 1, 2, 3, 5.
Sheng
-Original Message-
From: softwires-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:softwires-boun...@ietf.org] On
Behalf Of Yong Cui
Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2011 10:21 PM
To: softwires@ietf.org
Cc: Yong Cui
Subject: [Softwires] New working group documents
Hi,
I support to adopt all.
Qiong Sun
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 10:21 PM, Yong Cui cuiy...@tsinghua.edu.cn wrote:
Hi folks,
Following our rough concensus during Quebec City meeting and
according to our charter/milestones, the chairs would like to
ask the mailing list for the confirmation to
Re-,
On 8/22/2011 1:02 PM, Qiong wrote:
Hi,
I support to adopt all.
+1
Cheers,
Jacni
Qiong Sun
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 10:21 PM, Yong Cui cuiy...@tsinghua.edu.cn
mailto:cuiy...@tsinghua.edu.cn wrote:
Hi folks,
Following our rough concensus during Quebec City meeting and
