Hi Nikhil,
On Tuesday, 12.06.2018 at 13:47, nikhil ap wrote:
> > I'm not sure what you mean. What selection of modules gets complied
> > in/enabled for a tender would be up to the operator of that tender to
> > determine as a policy decision. The tender would then, based on
> > interpreting the
On Friday, 08.06.2018 at 17:21, Martin Lucina wrote:
> An update on this:
>
> After discussing with some of the core Mirage folks and others at robur,
> we've come to the conclusion that it is better to release what we have now
> rather than wait after the renaming is complete.
>
> So, the rough
Hi Martin,
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 2:09 PM, Martin Lucina wrote:
> Hi Nikhil,
>
> On Tuesday, 12.06.2018 at 13:47, nikhil ap wrote:
> > > I'm not sure what you mean. What selection of modules gets complied
> > > in/enabled for a tender would be up to the operator of that tender to
> > >
Hi Martin,
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 5:56 PM, Martin Lucina wrote:
> Hi Nikhil,
>
> On Monday, 11.06.2018 at 16:10, nikhil ap wrote:
> > I'm not familiar with MirageOS. I need to look at how it works.
> > Although, this implies that we need to change the tooling for every
> > unikernel we
