3) should we be concerned about letting people specify prefixes/suffixes
of the fields they want to forcably load for dynamicFields instead of just
a SetString of names? .. or should we cross that bridge when we come to
it? (I ask because we have no cache aware method that takes in a
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-52?page=comments#action_12440945 ]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-52:
--
hence the data will be stored in the field *twice* for some reason
FYI, I just checked in a Lucene fix for this.
Lazy Field
On 10/9/06, Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: I wouldn't expect there to be much of a difference. Lazy fields hold
: on to a stream and an offset, and operate by seek()'ing to the right
...
Hmmm... yeah it sounds like it shouldn't matter. If i get soem time i'll
try to do a
On 10/9/06, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...At the technical level, what do people thing should be
changed/committed before we do?...
Not sure what you mean by technical level...if I'm allowed to
suggest my own patch, I think
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-49
On 10/9/06, Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/9/06, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...At the technical level, what do people thing should be
changed/committed before we do?...
Not sure what you mean by technical level
There is other stuff that needs to be done before
On 10/9/06, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/9/06, Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...Not sure what you mean by technical level
There is other stuff that needs to be done before we can release, such
as a change of copyright notices to comply with new ASF
On 10/9/06, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we should plan on making a release soon (end of October?)
At the technical level, what do people thing should be
changed/committed before we do?
Off the top of my head, perhaps
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2
because it has
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-52?page=all ]
Mike Klaas updated SOLR-52:
---
Attachment: lazyfields_patch.diff
updated version of patch. Addresses some of Hoss' (minor) comments. Also, the
.doc() method of SolrIndexSearcher will added the unique
Hi,
On 10/9/06, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is other stuff that needs to be done before we can release, such
as a change of copyright notices to comply with new ASF requirements.
I imagine incubator-general will go over the first release we make
with a fine-tooth comb looking
: - stabilize/review external api (query parameters,
: schema.xml/solrconfig.xml format, XML response format). (for
Right ... it's not something that i've thought about lately, but doing
something with the XSD in SOLR-17 so that the XML output format can be
validated would probably be a good
: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-49 (XSLTResponseWriter)
: could be committed. It has no impact on existing code and can be
: useful for simple setups, demos, etc.
On the subject of stablizing the external APIs, the one thing about your
patch in it's current format that I rememebr
11 matches
Mail list logo
