[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-592?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lars Kotthoff updated SOLR-592:
---
Attachment: SOLR-592-parameter-constants.patch
Patch replacing the hardcoded strings with the proper
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-517?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12602885#action_12602885
]
koji edited comment on SOLR-517 at 6/6/08 1:58 AM:
-
Mike,
I
I think a separate issue is warranted. Can you add unit tests, too?
On Jun 5, 2008, at 3:33 PM, Tom Morton wrote:
Hi,
SOLR-295 mentions boost support for morelikethis and then seems
to have been subsumed by SOLR-281 but I don't think this got
implemented. I've patched
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll updated SOLR-572:
-
Attachment: SOLR-572.patch
Small mod to move name and name init up to the SolrSpellChecker
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-561?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12603040#action_12603040
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-561:
-
can we make SOLR-551 a subproject of this?
Solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll updated SOLR-572:
-
Attachment: SOLR-572.patch
Removes unmodifiableMap factor from the suggestions/token freqs.
+1
On Jun 5, 2008, at 2:31 PM, Ryan McKinley (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12602740
#action_12602740 ]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-486:
I think I can't really understand what QParser is meant for.
Given a field name I want to get the double representation of the value for
that field in a specific document.
Why do I need QParser in getValueSource?
Sorry if it's a stupid question :S
Jonathan
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Erik
On Jun 5, 2008, at 7:45 PM, Mike Klaas wrote:
On 21-May-08, at 4:45 PM, Mike Klaas wrote:
There seems to be some sort of consensus building that there should
be a 1.3 release in the near future. The first step is to figure
out what we want to finish before it gets released.
The list
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12603070#action_12603070
]
Oleg Gnatovskiy commented on SOLR-572:
--
Do these latest patches require Lucene 2.4?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12603075#action_12603075
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-572:
--
{quote}
Do these latest patches require Lucene
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-561?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12603081#action_12603081
]
Otis Gospodnetic commented on SOLR-561:
---
I think so. You already started doing that
Most of the getValueSource calls are from a QParser (for parsing
function queries), and it serves as the context for the call.
At least one ValueSource needed the SolrCore, and it seemed more
futureproof to just pass the QParser (can get the request from there
too).
-Yonik
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12603135#action_12603135
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-486:
-
one test failed in distributed search results when I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12603136#action_12603136
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-486:
bq. or we will have to modify the
+num = 234;
+ //? why 1?
+ // assertEquals( 0, BitUtil.ntz(num) );
+ // assertEquals( 0, BitUtil.ntz2(num) );
+ // assertEquals( 0, BitUtil.ntz3(num) );
+ }
Any idea why the answer is 1? the docs say (only works for x!=0)
I'm trying to add some unit tests now. MoreLikeThisHandler had a minimal
set of tests which don't actually test its output, just that fields and a
query parameters are required. It'll take me a bit to write something for
the regular version and then the version with specified boosts.
On Fri,
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Ryan McKinley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+num = 234;
+ //? why 1?
+ // assertEquals( 0, BitUtil.ntz(num) );
+ // assertEquals( 0, BitUtil.ntz2(num) );
+ // assertEquals( 0, BitUtil.ntz3(num) );
+ }
Any idea why the answer is 1? the docs say
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12603220#action_12603220
]
Swarag Segu commented on SOLR-572:
--
Hey guys. Installed the latest patch. Old problem is
19 matches
Mail list logo
