[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (SOLR-84) Logo Contests

2008-10-16 Thread Lozer T. User (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-84?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12640079#action_12640079 ] ltu edited comment on SOLR-84 at 10/15/08 11:42 PM: -- A second

[jira] Updated: (SOLR-84) Logo Contests

2008-10-16 Thread Lozer T. User (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-84?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lozer T. User updated SOLR-84: -- Attachment: solr_attempt2.jpg A second attempt using a different fireball. Will gladly attach the higher

[jira] Updated: (SOLR-561) Solr replication by Solr (for windows also)

2008-10-16 Thread Akshay K. Ukey (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-561?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Akshay K. Ukey updated SOLR-561: Attachment: SOLR-561.patch Patch with following changes: # segments_ file moved in the end. # Some

Re: Offer to submit some custom enhancements

2008-10-16 Thread Grant Ingersoll
Hi Todd, All of these sound good. Personally, I think analyzers like these belong in Lucene's contrib/analyzers package, with Solr factory implementations built on those, but that's your call. As for the Protocol Buffers, I am assuming you mean: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/ That

Re: [jira] Issue Comment Edited: (SOLR-84) Logo Contests

2008-10-16 Thread Mark Miller
I am really liking the second one. Great balls of fire though? - Mark On Oct 15, 2008, at 11:42 PM, Lozer T. User (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [

[jira] Created: (SOLR-811) allow user to specify the deltaImportQuery instead of DIH building it

2008-10-16 Thread Noble Paul (JIRA)
allow user to specify the deltaImportQuery instead of DIH building it - Key: SOLR-811 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-811 Project: Solr Issue Type:

Re: Offer to submit some custom enhancements

2008-10-16 Thread Shalin Shekhar Mangar
Hi Todd, AFAIK, protocol buffers cannot be used for Solr because it is unable to support the NamedList structure that all Solr components use. The binary protocol (NamedListCodec) that SolrJ uses to communicate with Solr server is extremely optimized for our response format. However it is Java

Re: Offer to submit some custom enhancements

2008-10-16 Thread Walter Underwood
Python marshal format supports everything we need and is easy to implement in Java. It is roughly equivalent to JSON, but binary. http://docs.python.org/library/marshal.html wunder On 10/16/08 8:16 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Todd, AFAIK, protocol buffers cannot

RE: Offer to submit some custom enhancements

2008-10-16 Thread Feak, Todd
Regarding the location of the Filters and Factories ... I agree that the Filters would be best located in Lucene, as users of both packages would then have access. What I'm struggling with is the timing of putting Filters into Lucene, and then Factories into Solr. The Factories in Solr would be

RE: Offer to submit some custom enhancements

2008-10-16 Thread Feak, Todd
Answering Grant Ingersoll's question for use case as well, which may clarify. Without revealing TOO much about our internal structure, we are in the process of replacing SOAP communications in house with Protocol Buffers. We did evaluate Thrift as well, but decided on Protocol Buffers. A large

[jira] Created: (SOLR-812) JDBC optimizations: setReadOnly, setMaxRows

2008-10-16 Thread David Smiley (JIRA)
JDBC optimizations: setReadOnly, setMaxRows --- Key: SOLR-812 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-812 Project: Solr Issue Type: Improvement Components: contrib -

[jira] Updated: (SOLR-84) Logo Contests

2008-10-16 Thread Lukas Vlcek (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-84?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lukas Vlcek updated SOLR-84: Attachment: apache_solr_sun.png Logo Contests - Key: SOLR-84