[jira] Updated: (SOLR-889) Upgrade dependent libraries to most recent stable version

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-889?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jan-Pascal updated SOLR-889: Attachment: patch-to-fix-failed-test-with-newer-jetty.diff Hi all, I'm running into this issue while

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-889) Upgrade dependent libraries to most recent stable version

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-889?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12695299#action_12695299 ] Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-889: bq. I haven't been able to find out

[jira] Updated: (SOLR-1068) Use fsync on replicated index and configuration files

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1068?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shalin Shekhar Mangar updated SOLR-1068: Attachment: SOLR-1068.patch Updating to trunk. I'll commit this shortly. Use

[jira] Updated: (SOLR-934) Enable importing of mails into a solr index through DIH.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shalin Shekhar Mangar updated SOLR-934: --- Attachment: SOLR-934.patch Changes: # Parse and store the fetchMailsSince string

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-769) Support Document and Search Result clustering

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12695401#action_12695401 ] Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-769: -- Hi Stanislaw, I'm going to commit soon and I

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-1085) SolrJ client java does not support moreLikeThis querys and results

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1085?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12695418#action_12695418 ] Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-1085: - Maurice, this patch is based on

Re: [jira] Updated: (SOLR-934) Enable importing of mails into a solr index through DIH.

I don't know if I am missing something, but emails have a Message-ID header that is unique by definition, would that do? On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote:     [

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-769) Support Document and Search Result clustering

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12695463#action_12695463 ] Stanislaw Osinski commented on SOLR-769: Hi Grant, If you download

[jira] Updated: (SOLR-940) TrieRange support

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-940: --- Attachment: SOLR-940-newTrieAPI.patch TrieRange support - Key:

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-940) TrieRange support

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12695581#action_12695581 ] Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-940: This patch modifies Solr support for trie fields to

[jira] Updated: (SOLR-908) Port of Nutch CommonGrams filter to Solr

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-908?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom Burton-West updated SOLR-908: - Attachment: CommonGramsPort.zip Attached is my first cut at a port of the Nutch CommonGrams

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (SOLR-908) Port of Nutch CommonGrams filter to Solr

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-908?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12695637#action_12695637 ] Tom Burton-West edited comment on SOLR-908 at 4/3/09 4:25 PM: --

Re: [jira] Updated: (SOLR-934) Enable importing of mails into a solr index through DIH.

On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 9:00 PM, jm jmugur...@gmail.com wrote: I don't know if I am missing something, but emails have a Message-ID header that is unique by definition, would that do? Yes but I guess the patch does not exposes this field. We shoud also support the in-reply-to attribute. --