Whoa ... Typos are nothing new to the Solr documentation, but i think
this is the first time I've been the one to notice a type in something
someone else wrote...
: +We can facet multile ways at the same time. The following example adds
in a facet on the
Also, the URLs in the
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 2:33 AM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
Whoa ... Typos are nothing new to the Solr documentation, but i think
this is the first time I've been the one to notice a type in something
someone else wrote...
: + We can facet multile ways at the same
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-64?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12770027#action_12770027
]
Lesiak Rémy commented on SOLR-64:
-
Hi all,
I use the the Solr version 1.4-dev.
I want to
Will do once I have a Lucene RC.
On Oct 25, 2009, at 3:59 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
If all goes well in lucene-land 2.9.1 should start a vote on Monday
sometime...
I've recently tested the latest stable Jetty (6.1.21) ... so we can
avoid some duplication, has anyone tested with the latest
: These are realy URL fragments... none of the other examples show the
: indent=on or the rest of the URL either, and when we get down to
indent=on doesn't really affect the structure of the response docs
(especially since people following the tutorial are likely to be using a
browser that
While some of this could hypothetically be confusing, I don't think it
will be in reality.
Surprising, yes, but I don't think in a bad way.
I'm against cluttering the examples with all of the parameters... but
prepending ... to show that some parameters have been omitted seems
OK.
I'll do it now.
So, just to clarify, here's the plan as I understand it:
1. Put up a 1.4.0 RC today w/ 2.9.1-RC2
2. Commence vote on 1.4.0
3. Once 2.9.1 is finalized, replace in Solr and generate final artifacts
4. Release
Is that correct? This basically works on the assumption that the only
thing that has
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
So, just to clarify, here's the plan as I understand it:
1. Put up a 1.4.0 RC today w/ 2.9.1-RC2
Yes, ASAP please :-)
2. Commence vote on 1.4.0
3. Once 2.9.1 is finalized, replace in Solr and generate final
On Oct 26, 2009, at 4:05 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Grant Ingersoll
gsing...@apache.org wrote:
So, just to clarify, here's the plan as I understand it:
1. Put up a 1.4.0 RC today w/ 2.9.1-RC2
Yes, ASAP please :-)
2. Commence vote on 1.4.0
3. Once 2.9.1 is
From http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HowToRelease:
Check out the branch with: svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/branches/branch-X.Y
\
Note: at the moment releases need to be done on a unix box or in a
cygwin environment with unix linefeeds, because fixcrlf is only done
on
On Oct 26, 2009, at 4:00 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
So, just to clarify, here's the plan as I understand it:
1. Put up a 1.4.0 RC today w/ 2.9.1-RC2
2. Commence vote on 1.4.0
3. Once 2.9.1 is finalized, replace in Solr and generate final
artifacts
We also must make sure the maven pom.xml
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
Does the second step (step 7 on the wiki) occur on the branch that we just
checked out? I know in the end that I'm building w/ specversion and version
set to 1.4.0 for the release, but that update of common-build.xml
Hmm, OK. I will need to update the branch build again, then. I
wasn't thinking about it for my specific release and not about going
forward.
On Oct 26, 2009, at 5:14 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Grant Ingersoll
gsing...@apache.org wrote:
Does the second step
Tis the season for releases...
Please vote on releasing the Solr 1.4.0 artifacts located at http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/solr/1.4.0/
(note, solr.tar and solr-maven.tar are not artifacts to be released)
CHANGES are spelled out at
Yup - good point. Solr 1.4 vote just started though - doubt anyone is
willing to start over for that - if something comes up, it should prob
just be removed though.
Uwe Schindler wrote:
By the way, as Solr updated to the latest 2.9.1 artifacts: the
SolrQueryWrapper fix for highlighter is now
Hmmm, weren't you going to update the version numbers to 1.4.1-dev
like we just discussed in the other thread?
That way if someone changes some of the solr source from the download
and recompiles, they don't get a version number of 1.4.0
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Mon, Oct 26,
Also, not sure what the policy is on voting on files where the pom
still needs to change..
http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/solr/1.4.0/maven/org/apache/solr/solr-core/1.4.0/solr-core-1.4.0.pom
points to:
dependency
groupIdorg.apache.lucene/groupId
artifactIdlucene-analyzers/artifactId
I can do it again. The generation process is pretty easy now.
On Oct 26, 2009, at 6:42 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
Also, not sure what the policy is on voting on files where the pom
still needs to change..
Yes.
I need to update the POMs too, so scratch this vote for a little bit.
On Oct 26, 2009, at 6:35 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
Hmmm, weren't you going to update the version numbers to 1.4.1-dev
like we just discussed in the other thread?
That way if someone changes some of the solr source from
If you want to update this, go for it. I am starting over. Let me
know.
On Oct 26, 2009, at 6:24 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
Yup - good point. Solr 1.4 vote just started though - doubt anyone is
willing to start over for that - if something comes up, it should prob
just be removed though.
Uwe
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
Not following...
I just updated the default version to 1.4.1-dev on the branch.
I really don't know what maven_version should be set to... I guess we
can leave it at 1.4.0 for now.
This gets a little tricky w/ the
On Oct 26, 2009, at 8:40 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Grant Ingersoll
gsing...@apache.org wrote:
Not following...
I just updated the default version to 1.4.1-dev on the branch.
I really don't know what maven_version should be set to... I guess we
can leave it at
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
On Oct 26, 2009, at 8:40 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org
wrote:
Not following...
I just updated the default
OK, take two is up in the same place. Please vote.
On Oct 26, 2009, at 6:15 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Tis the season for releases...
Please vote on releasing the Solr 1.4.0 artifacts located at http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/solr/1.4.0/
(note, solr.tar and solr-maven.tar are not
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
OK, take two is up in the same place. Please vote.
I'm seeing emptiness at
http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/solr/1.4.0/
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Oct 26, 2009, at 6:15 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12770358#action_12770358
]
Lance Norskog commented on SOLR-236:
This looks like a really nice rework! This JIRA has
26 matches
Mail list logo
