Handle +/-Inf, NaN when scoring
Key: SOLR-1785
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1785
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 1.4
Reporter: Yonik Seeley
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12836387#action_12836387
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1785:
In Solr 1.3 and before, +-Inf were handled
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12836394#action_12836394
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1297:
---
Not following. What do I need to fix?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12836398#action_12836398
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1297:
Function queries can contain normal queries, which
Hi,
I'm wondering if there is a reason why the @Field annotation is
restricted to setters?
In my case I would like to index beans from java using the solrj client
implementation. Transforming documents to beans is not required because
I use queries to Solr from JavaScript only.
To avoid
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12836387#action_12836387
]
Yonik Seeley edited comment on SOLR-1785 at 2/21/10 6:57 PM:
-
In
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 11:04 PM, Norman Wiechmann n.wiechm...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi,
I'm wondering if there is a reason why the @Field annotation is restricted
to setters?
The preferred way is to apply the annotation to fields. it is provided
on setters also if you prefer the set/get xxx() route.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Noble Paul reassigned SOLR-1781:
Assignee: Noble Paul
Replication index directories not always cleaned up
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12836519#action_12836519
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-1781:
--
The problem is that while you are trying to delete the