@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2007 11:53:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [Jetty-support] Stable Release 6.1.2]
On 5/2/07, Ryan McKinley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
should we consider including this?
+1 to Jetty 1.2
Otis, any observations yet?
Longer term, it would be nice to have an external test suite
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [Jetty-support] Stable Release 6.1.2]
On 5/2/07, Ryan McKinley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
should we consider including this?
+1 to Jetty 1.2
Otis, any observations yet?
Longer term, it would be nice to have an external test suite that one
could point at a real solr server
On 10-May-07, at 4:46 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
I haven't moved to 6.* yet. But I did notice 6.1.3 showed up a
few days ago.
I think 6.1.3 showed up a day after 6.1.2!
That's always an encouraging sign :)
-Mike
On 5/2/07, Ryan McKinley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
should we consider including this?
+1 to Jetty 1.2
Otis, any observations yet?
Longer term, it would be nice to have an external test suite that one
could point at a real solr server and verify it is configured
correctly:
- UTF8 in URLs, etc
-
should we consider including this?
I have been using jetty-6.1.2rc3 without problems
Original Message
Subject: [Jetty-support] Stable Release 6.1.2
Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 14:01:39 +1000
From: Greg Wilkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jetty usage, help informal support
/ - Tag - Search - Share
- Original Message
From: Ryan McKinley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2007 11:21:14 AM
Subject: [Fwd: [Jetty-support] Stable Release 6.1.2]
should we consider including this?
I have been using jetty-6.1.2rc3 without
