The logo is now up!
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/
Thanks to Hoss who fixed a missing file check in. The one thing not
caught by testing locally...
-Mike
On 19-Dec-08, at 12:52 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
go for it
(i don't have forrest running...)
On Dec 19, 2008, at 3:34 PM, Mike K
go for it
(i don't have forrest running...)
On Dec 19, 2008, at 3:34 PM, Mike Klaas wrote:
On 17-Dec-08, at 5:11 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
Hoss - can you go ahead and post something? I'm heading out...
but could post tomorrow.
Since the community has been notified, any objections
On 17-Dec-08, at 5:11 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
Hoss - can you go ahead and post something? I'm heading out... but
could post tomorrow.
Since the community has been notified, any objections to me updating
the site with the new logo/favicon?
-Mike
On Dec 17, 2008, at 7:05 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: > Ok, all votes are cast (except Grant who is abstaining)
:
: Thanks for tallying the votes, Ryan. You're too damn quick for me!
It loks like Michiel attached a rar filecontaining some eps variants
of
the winning entry to SOLR-84 (did so
: > Ok, all votes are cast (except Grant who is abstaining)
:
: Thanks for tallying the votes, Ryan. You're too damn quick for me!
It loks like Michiel attached a rar filecontaining some eps variants of
the winning entry to SOLR-84 (did someone email him off list asking for
that?) so i think t
On 13-Dec-08, at 2:52 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
Ok, all votes are cast (except Grant who is abstaining)
Thanks for tallying the votes, Ryan. You're too damn quick for me!
-Mike
: I hope we are all happy with the result. I'll post to solr-user tomorrow
: unless anyone chimes in with a veto or something crazy!
the only hitch is...
...if your entry is selected to be the new Solr Log you must
provide the "scalable vector, print quality version of the logo
I much prefer "Solr" being in that case format. An all-upcased SOLR
ain't right to me. But I'm particular about such things. And the
font on the winner perhaps could use some tweaking?
Erik
On Dec 13, 2008, at 7:35 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
We can declare a winner to the contest,
We can declare a winner to the contest, but hopefully we can still
tweak (after all, we need different sizes (or vectorized),
transparency, etc.) As I stated before, I'd like to get feedback on
the actual preferred variant, because as I read the tea leaves, these
two variants may be preferred over
Ok, all votes are cast (except Grant who is abstaining)
results are:
http://people.apache.org/~ryan/solr-logo-r2.html
Looks like the winner is:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394264/apache_solr_a_red.jpg
runner up is:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394070
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394070/sslogo-solr-finder2.0.png
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12393995/sslogo-solr-70s.png
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394475/solr2_maho-vote.png
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394165/
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394264/apache_solr_a_red.jpg
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394268/apache_solr_c_red.jpg
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394070/sslogo-solr-finder2.0.png
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394266/apache_solr_b_red.jpg
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394475/solr2_maho-vote.png
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394264/apache_solr_a_red.jpg
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394268/apa
To try and avoid double-counting (the same person voting for a red
version, then a blue version, etc), I went back to the original vote:
21 people had one of the apache_solr_[abc]_[red/blue].jpg varianst
ahead of sslogo-solr-finder2.0.png
3 people had sslogo-solr-finder2.0.png ahead of apache_solr
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12392306/apache_solr_sun.png
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394165/solr-logo.png
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394475/solr2_maho-vote.png
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394376/solr_sp.png
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394268/apache_solr_c_red.jpg
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394350/solr.s4.jpg
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394267/apache_solr_c_blue.jpg
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394264/apache_sol
: To cast a valid vote, you *must* include 4 options.
As discussed, I believe ryan ment "at least 4"
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394264/apache_solr_a_red.jpg
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394070/sslogo-solr-finder2.0.png
https://issues.apache.org/
Agreed -- assuming there is a clear winner none of this is an issue.
My rationale for saying we need to have 4 votes is to be sure that we
can go through 4 rounds and have everyone have a vote in each round.
If someone only put one preference and that is eliminated, there are
fewer votes
I agree. I don't see why there needs to be a minimum or maximum
number of logos to rank per vote.
-Mike
On 10-Dec-08, at 7:52 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
Doesn't limiting to top 4 defeat the purpose of using STV to overcome
splitting-the-vote?
Seems like we should rank the whole list (or all t
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394070/sslogo-solr-finder2.0.png
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394264/apache_solr_a_red.jpg
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394266/apache_solr_b_red.jpg
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/123942
On Dec 10, 2008, at 10:12 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394475/solr2_maho-vote.png
is this one ok?
Seems totally fine by me.
I don't think STV makes much sense unless we are picking more then
one. The key in STV is that the extra votes for the "winner" get
passed on to the choice. Since there really is not a next choice it
does not help.
Instant Runoff however does make sense. We cycle through the votes
and
Doesn't limiting to top 4 defeat the purpose of using STV to overcome
splitting-the-vote?
Seems like we should rank the whole list (or all that an individual
finds acceptable)
-Yonik
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This thread is for solr committers to
/secure/attachment/12391946/apache_solr_burning.png
Otis
- Original Message
> From: Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 8:51:42 PM
> Subject: [VOTE] LOGO
>
> This thread is for solr committers
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394070/sslogo-solr-finder2.0.png
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394264/apache_solr_a_red.jpg
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394266/apache_solr_b_red.jpg
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394
This thread is for solr committers to list the top 4 logos preferences
from the community logo contest. As a guide, we should look at:
http://people.apache.org/~ryan/solr-logo-results.html
The winner will be tabulated using "instant runoff voting" -- if this
happens to result in a tie, the w
26 matches
Mail list logo
