On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's the point of the DirectUpdateHandler? Why would I ever pick it when
> I could have the "High performance" DUH2?
History: at one point in time (a relatively short point in time before
even Hoss knew about Solr), D
What's the point of the DirectUpdateHandler? Why would I ever pick it
when I could have the "High performance" DUH2? More pointedly, if I
am adding a feature (SOLR-603) that touches DUH2, and DUH also could
implement the feature, do I need to add it to DUH as well?
The naming of the DUH2
