first wrote the multi-threaded-ness of DUH2, I'd be
very happy to promptly review any improvements made to it.
-Mike
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/DirectUpdateHandler2-threads-pile-up-behind-scheduleCommitWithin-tp23431691p23472391.html
Sent from the Solr - Dev
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 5:49 AM, Mike Klaas mike.kl...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, I'll take a look in the next few days. The current patch doesn't
guarantee index consistency during post-commit callback hooks, right? This
could be a problem for index replication. (Incidentally, I'm rather
://www.nabble.com/DirectUpdateHandler2-threads-pile-up-behind-scheduleCommitWithin-tp23431691p23472391.html
Sent from the Solr - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 7-May-09, at 10:36 AM, jayson.minard wrote:
Does every thread really need to notify the update handler of the
commit
interval/threshold being reached, or really just the first thread that
notices should send the signal, or better yet a background commit
watching
thread so that no
. That is
assuming they wouldn't need to block like they are now for a reason I'm
likely unaware of...
--j
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/DirectUpdateHandler2-threads-pile-up-behind-scheduleCommitWithin-tp23431691p23431745.html
Sent from the Solr - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
