On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 10:18 -0500, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On 12/20/06, Thorsten Scherler
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > looking at the source code I wonder whether we have a preferred xml
> > parser model?
> >
> > I mean I can find:
> > - pull parsing
> > - DOM
> > - JDOM (at least in some jira pa
On 12/20/06, Thorsten Scherler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
looking at the source code I wonder whether we have a preferred xml
parser model?
I mean I can find:
- pull parsing
- DOM
- JDOM (at least in some jira patches)
IMO, DOM & xpath is good for config. xpath is easy, flexible and less
erro
StAX is now supported in JSE6, which has just been released.
I also found StAX to be very fast and easy to use.
Bill
On 12/20/06, Thorsten Scherler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi all,
looking at the source code I wonder whether we have a preferred xml
parser model?
I mean I can find:
- pull p
