Re: SearchComponents and Distributed Search

2009-06-22 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Jun 19, 2009, at 6:35 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: On Fri, 22 May 2009, Yonik Seeley wrote: : > I think it is reasonable to say, at this point, that we should now require : > any new SearchComponents to be distributed capable before committing. : : That's too high of a bar. : If somethi

Re: SearchComponents and Distributed Search

2009-06-19 Thread Chris Hostetter
On Fri, 22 May 2009, Yonik Seeley wrote: : > I think it is reasonable to say, at this point, that we should now require : > any new SearchComponents to be distributed capable before committing. : : That's too high of a bar. : If something is good and useful, it should be committed. : And we cert

Re: SearchComponents and Distributed Search

2009-05-22 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 6:50 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > Seems like distributed search is starting to hit some critical mass (there > has been a whole bunch of patches to make components distributed lately.) > > I think it is reasonable to say, at this point, that we should now require > any new

SearchComponents and Distributed Search

2009-05-22 Thread Grant Ingersoll
Seems like distributed search is starting to hit some critical mass (there has been a whole bunch of patches to make components distributed lately.) I think it is reasonable to say, at this point, that we should now require any new SearchComponents to be distributed capable before committ