Re: minor nit....

2009-12-07 Thread Thijs
I've just updated to the latest 1.4 head and found that my log is only showing lines like: INFO: {add=[x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,x6,x7, ... (8 added)]} 0 13627 Debugging LogUpdateProcessorFactory; adds.size() is always 8 while numAdds is a number in the hundreds, depending on the added list of

minor nit....

2009-10-21 Thread Ryan McKinley
I'm looking through a bunch of logs that have: UpdateRequestProcessor - {add=[aa, bb, cc, dd, ee, ff, gg, hh, ...(142 more)]} Would it be more reasonable to say: 150 total rather then make you count the previous 8? kinda stupid, but i guess this is what drives you nuts while chasing real

Re: minor nit....

2009-10-21 Thread Shalin Shekhar Mangar
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Ryan McKinley ryan...@gmail.com wrote: I'm looking through a bunch of logs that have: UpdateRequestProcessor - {add=[aa, bb, cc, dd, ee, ff, gg, hh, ...(142 more)]} Would it be more reasonable to say: 150 total rather then make you count the previous 8? +1

Re: minor nit....

2009-10-21 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:44 PM, Ryan McKinley ryan...@gmail.com wrote: I'm looking through a bunch of logs that have: UpdateRequestProcessor - {add=[aa, bb, cc, dd, ee, ff, gg, hh, ...(142 more)]} Would it be more reasonable to say: 150 total rather then make you count the previous 8? Yep,