Re: svn commit: r659664 - in /lucene/solr/trunk: CHANGES.txt src/java/org/apache/solr/common/params/HighlightParams.java src/java/org/apache/solr/highlight/DefaultSolrHighlighter.java src/test/org/apa

Well, if we're not sure on upgrading, we probably should roll this one back. I personally haven't tested 2.4-dev with Solr, but it probably is fine. I don't think copying just the highlighter is the right thing. -Grant On May 23, 2008, at 11:15 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: Ah, sorry about

Re: svn commit: r659664 - in /lucene/solr/trunk: CHANGES.txt src/java/org/apache/solr/common/params/HighlightParams.java src/java/org/apache/solr/highlight/DefaultSolrHighlighter.java src/test/org/apa

So, upgrading to Lucene trunk breaks the SpellCheckerRequestHandler: Running org.apache.solr.handler.SpellCheckerRequestHandlerTest [junit] response [junit] responseHeaderstatus0/statusQTime1/QTime/ responseHeaderint name=numDocs10/intlst name=resultlst name=catint

Re: svn commit: r659664 - in /lucene/solr/trunk: CHANGES.txt src/java/org/apache/solr/common/params/HighlightParams.java src/java/org/apache/solr/highlight/DefaultSolrHighlighter.java src/test/org/apa

Also https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1183 On May 24, 2008, at 8:06 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: So, upgrading to Lucene trunk breaks the SpellCheckerRequestHandler: Running org.apache.solr.handler.SpellCheckerRequestHandlerTest [junit] response [junit]

Re: svn commit: r659664 - in /lucene/solr/trunk: CHANGES.txt src/java/org/apache/solr/common/params/HighlightParams.java src/java/org/apache/solr/highlight/DefaultSolrHighlighter.java src/test/org/apa

Ah, sorry about that - I was looking at that issue trying to remember why I made a reference to Lucene. Now I remember. :) I assume nobody minds getting 2.4-dev in there, right? Shall I move all lib/lucene*jar to 2.4-dev or just the highlighter? Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ --