damn, there goes the platform independance ...
is there anybody with a lillte more experience when it comes to collection
distribution on Windows ?
tnx in advance !
Bill Au [EMAIL PROTECTED]
02/05/2007 15:09
Please respond to
solr-user@lucene.apache.org
To
solr-user@lucene.apache.org
cc
In additional to snapshot, you can also make backup copies of your Solr
index using the backup script.
Backup are created the same way as snapshots using hard links. Each one is
a viable full index.
Bill
On 5/3/07, Charlie Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a couple of questions
A agree that multi-word synonyms are an excellent way to do this.
This may sound like a hack, but you'd end up doing this even if
you had dedicated linguistic compound decomposition software.
Those usually use a dictionary of common words and the dictionary
rarely has all the words that are
Thanks. Looking forward to it!
We are working on this and hope to have a solr patch soon. Doing
simple splitting on punctuation is a new fragmenter, which trunk solr
does not support yet. But we're hoping to fix that asap.
-brian
: Just to be clear, I have multiple fields per document that Are coming
: back in the queried XML. Let's say it's name, id, date, description. I
: want to sort dynamically on fields but for my test case on Description.
: Are you suggesting that there be one field defined per document, or you
:
: the scenario, understand this that user runs a search for title which has
: pretty common terms such as how do I update {all of the words appears
: 1000s of times in indexes } and they want to search prison the last term
: appears not more than 1 or 2 times across the indexes. Now I have the
:
I've been using solr.py to post and search. It works well.
Is it possible to specify doc boost and field boost with it?
Jack
Erik There is a solr.py in the Solr clients directory:
Erik http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/trunk/client/python/solr.py
Erik It's got some utility methods for
The Python output uses nested dictionaries for facet counts.
I read it online that Python dictionaries do not preserve order.
So when a string is eval()'d, the sorted order is lost in the
generated Python object. Is it a good idea to use list to wrap
around the dictionary? This is only needed for
On 5/3/07, Jack L [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Python output uses nested dictionaries for facet counts.
I read it online that Python dictionaries do not preserve order.
So when a string is eval()'d, the sorted order is lost in the
generated Python object. Is it a good idea to use list to wrap
