Thank you much. I also tried installing a non-nightly build of solr (1.1)
and it works without the mime information bit.
Thanks again
alessandro
On 5/15/07, Brian Whitman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Add -H 'Content-type:text/xml; charset=utf-8' after the 'delete...
/delete' bit.
On May 15,
On 5/16/07, Alessandro Ferrucci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you much. I also tried installing a non-nightly build of solr (1.1)
and it works without the mime information bit.
The current development will also work without a Content-type being
specified (it will assume UTF-8).
The real
The acts_as_solr plugin v.0.8.5 has been released and this short
release includes:
FIX: There's no need to specify the :field_types anymore when doing a
search in a model that specifies a field type for a field. The field
types are automatically traced back when they're included
#Indexing
class
I downloaded and patched my solr source with the latest solr69 patch and
whenever I run ant I get an error:
[javac]
/office/src/apache-solr-nightly/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/MoreLikeThisHandler.java:145:
cannot find symbol
[javac] symbol : variable DEFAULT_MIN_DOC_FREQ
[javac]
Change it to DEFALT or change the spelling error in the Lucene version.
On May 16, 2007, at 12:13 PM, Andrew Nagy wrote:
I downloaded and patched my solr source with the latest solr69
patch and whenever I run ant I get an error:
[javac]
Hello Brian,
Thanks for your answer. It was helpful.
For your first issue, use a copyField to copy all the text you want
as default to a default search field.
Oh, I didn't know I could copy multiple fields to one field :)
I didn't quite figure out what copyField was for anyway but I guess
On 5/16/07, Jack L [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The doc describes the purpose of copyField as:
This is provided as a convenient way to ensure that data is
put into several fields, without needing to include the data in
the update command multiple times.
It sounds like many to many copying. What is
Good to know.
On 5/16/07, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/16/07, Alessandro Ferrucci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you much. I also tried installing a non-nightly build of solr (
1.1)
and it works without the mime information bit.
The current development will also work without
At 4:29 PM -0400 5/15/07, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On 5/15/07, bhecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...] the function parseRules in SynonymFilterFactory is private
If you start using Solr's configuration, you drag more of Solr in.
You can add the synonyms to the SynonymMap yourself, or if you want to
use
Thanks Yonik.
If I want to try out DisMaxRequestHandler, do I need to repost?
I suppose it is for searching only and does not require re-indexing?
--
Best regards,
Jack
It came later... standard was the first request handler.
dismax is the recommended starting point for anyone dealing with
On 5/16/07, Jack L [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I want to try out DisMaxRequestHandler, do I need to repost?
I suppose it is for searching only and does not require re-indexing?
No need to re-index, it's just a different request handler.
It's very much like the standard request handler, but it
Adding entries to RequestHandlerBase.getStatistics() sounds like it
might be a reasonable compromise; backwards compatibility is kept in
place but everything from now on gets the added advantages of more
tracking. So far I've added (because I need)
avgTimePerRequest
avgRequestsPerSecond
I agree
: show specific results based on a specific field - territory field and
: depending on where in the world you're coming from we'd like to show you
: advantage? Is there a way we can hint solr/lucene to use this information to
: provide better results? We could use filters on territory or we
I just wanted to say thanks to everyone for the creation of solr. I've been
using it for a while now and I have recently brought one of my side projects
online. I have several other projects that will be using solr for it's
search and facets.
Please check out www.pricejunkie.com and let us
Congrats, very nice job!
It's fast too.
-Yonik
On 5/16/07, Mike Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just wanted to say thanks to everyone for the creation of solr. I've been
using it for a while now and I have recently brought one of my side projects
online. I have several other projects that
how many solr instance?
2007/5/17, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Congrats, very nice job!
It's fast too.
-Yonik
On 5/16/07, Mike Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just wanted to say thanks to everyone for the creation of solr. I've
been
using it for a while now and I have recently
16 matches
Mail list logo
