Re: Multi-language indexing and searching

This sounds OK. I can create a field name mapping structure to change the requests / responses in a way my client doesn't need to be aware of different fields. Thanks for this directions, Daniel On 8/6/07 21:32, Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: : Can't I have the same index, using

Re: How does HTMLStripWhitespaceTokenizerFactory work?

Ok. Is it possible to get back the content without the html tags? On 08/06/07, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/8/07, Thierry Collogne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am trying to use the solr.HTMLStripWhitespaceTokenizerFactory analyzer with no luck. [...] Is this normal? Shouldn't

Re: Multi-language indexing and searching

Hi Henri, Thanks again, your considerations will sure help on my decision. Now I'll do my homework to check document volume / growth - expected index sizes and query load. Regards, Daniel Alheiros On 9/6/07 10:53, Henrib [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Daniel, Trying to recap: you are

Re: How can I use dates to boost my results?

Hi Nick. I was exactly what I was looking for. Thanks, Daniel On 9/6/07 13:12, Nick Jenkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Daniel You can use a boosting function, In the dismax request handler insert the following: str name=bf recip(rord(created),1,1000,1000) /str Obviously

Re: How does HTMLStripWhitespaceTokenizerFactory work?

On 11-Jun-07, at 3:54 AM, Thierry Collogne wrote: Ok. Is it possible to get back the content without the html tags? Well, it isn't stored anywhere in Solr. It's best to think of lucene/ solr as two systems: the indexer applies a tokenization transformation to the data and creates an

Re: How does HTMLStripWhitespaceTokenizerFactory work?

: Ok. Is it possible to get back the content without the html tags? Solr never does anything to modify the stored value of a field, so you'd really need to send Solr the value after strpping the HTML to get this to work. Internally, the HTMLStripWhitespaceTokenizerFactory does the HTML

Re: problem with schema.xml

I am having a similar(?) problem with 1.2 upgraded from an earlier incubator release. We upgraded by building the new war with ant by and replacing jetty's webapps/solr.war -- changes to schema.xml are not taking place by the method of exchanging solr/conf/schema.xml for an updated one with a new

question about sorting

Hi, My sorting fields include both TextField type and StrField type. Because TextField uses TokenizerFactory, they can't be sorted. I have to copy each TextField to a StrField and sort on those StrFields. Does anyone know if there is a better way to do that? Thanks Xuesong

Re: question about sorting

On 6/11/07, Xuesong Luo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My sorting fields include both TextField type and StrField type. Because TextField uses TokenizerFactory, they can't be sorted. I have to copy each TextField to a StrField and sort on those StrFields. Does anyone know if there is a better way to

Re: LIUS/Fulltext indexing

On 6/11/07, Vish D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone have experience working with LIUS ( http://sourceforge.net/projects/lius/)? I can't seem to find any real documentation on it, even though it seems 'active' @ sourceforge. I need a way to index various types of fulltext, and LIUS seems very

RE: question about sorting

For example, first name, department, job title etc. Thanks Xuesong -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yonik Seeley Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 6:35 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: question about sorting On 6/11/07, Xuesong

fq with standard request handler

Hi, I'm trying to use 'fq' param (see http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters ) with the standard request handler, using a field that is defined as an integer (values 1 or 0), is indexed, and is stored. For some reason, these two return no hits, even though I do have MyIntField

Re: fq with standard request handler

On 11-Jun-07, at 7:22 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: I'm trying to use 'fq' param (see http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ CommonQueryParameters ) with the standard request handler, using a field that is defined as an integer (values 1 or 0), is indexed, and is stored. For some reason, these two

Re: fq with standard request handler

: er... since the second batch of queries returned no hits, does that : not indicate that the problem _isn't_ with fq? You practically : stripped it down to raw lucene territory here. yeah, i'm with mike ... if q=birds AND MyIntField:0 returns no hits, it doesn't suprise me that

Re: problem with schema.xml

: replacing jetty's webapps/solr.war -- changes to schema.xml are not : taking place by the method of exchanging solr/conf/schema.xml for an : updated one with a new field name=foobar and restarting the sending : the solr java process a TERM and starting afresh... you're terminated the java

Re: fq with standard request handler

On 6/11/07, Otis Gospodnetic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm trying to use 'fq' param (see http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters ) with the standard request handler, using a field that is defined as an integer (values 1 or 0), is indexed, and is stored. For some reason, these