Is there a standard way to dump the Solr index to a file or to a
directory as backup, and to import a such saved index to another Solr
index later?
Another question I have, is whether one is allowed to copy the
/data/index folder while the Solr server is still running, as easy
alternative
Hello everyone,
I have tried Solr using jetty, its run on command prompt, but now I want to
comfigure solr on tomcat-6, so nay one know how to configure it as windows
service using tomcat.
Please let me know how its is possible.
--
Thanks in advance,
Laxmilal menaria
http://www.chambal.com/
Hello,
I have configured solr as Multiple Solr
appshttp://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrTomcat#head-ef0d6d9640b6f25a242a915d57e0709630915040with
tomcat
5.5, using http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrTomcat for configuration.
After configuration and search with admin panel it doesn't show any results,
but
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Maybe I'm not following your situation 100%, but it sounded like
pulling the values of purely stored fields is the slow part.
*Perhaps* using a non-Lucene data store just for the saved fields
would be faster.
For this purpose Nutch uses external files in Hadoop MapFile
For tomcat configuration notes, check:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrTomcat
I don't use tomcat, (their user list may be more useful if something
goes wrong) - but this may help:
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/windows-service-howto.html
ryan
Laxmilal Menaria wrote:
Hello
Are you indexing files while tomcat is running? If so, are you sending
the commit/ message? If so, can you see what is happening in the logs?
The jetty example and your tomcat setup probably put their indexes in
different places, so they will not have the same results.
ryan
Laxmilal
Actually it was not a problem with the xml, I ran all the xmls using one
thread and I found no problem at all.
But when I changed the solr version (I was using nightly) with version
1.2, all the threads run safely.
-Original Message-
From: Ryan McKinley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Hi,
Is there a way to perform 2 search queries in one search request, and then
return their combined results?
Currently I am performing the following:
I have a document which consists of id field which is the unique
identifier, the info field, and an xid field which contains the ids of
other
Solr indexes are file-based, so there's no need to dump the index to a file.
In terms of how to create backups and move those backups to other servers,
check out this page http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CollectionDistribution.
Hope that helps.
-Original Message-
From: Jörg Kiegeland
The LOAD method will load a core from a schema/config file -- it will
not need to be in multicore.xml (the persist=true option should
serialize this change into multicore.xml)
Henri's latest patch implements LOAD, but it needs some clean up to
apply cleanly to the current trunk.
ryan
Custom request handler approach seems the most straight forward and the only
one I can think of quickly.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: Rishabh Joshi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, January
If I understand the question... you essentially want a JOIN function.
Find the set of docs linked to by an initial query.
Right now, you either need to do two queries (in the client or custom
RequestHandler) OR, if possible, flatten the data into each doc. For
your specific example, can you
If you're writing to disk, you can minimize the chance of an
inconsistent index by hardlinking the files first (cp -l)
-Mike
On 2-Jan-08, at 8:10 AM, Charlie Jackson wrote:
Solr indexes are file-based, so there's no need to dump the index
to a file.
In terms of how to create backups and
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 16:25:58 +0530
Laxmilal Menaria [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have tried Solr using jetty, its run on command prompt, but now I want to
comfigure solr on tomcat-6, so nay one know how to configure it as windows
service using tomcat.
Any particular reason you don't use Jetty as
Hi,
I'm very interested in sharing performance stats with those who have indeces
that
contain more than 10MM documents. It seems that the response times and QPS
drops drastically with the number of documents in the index. This overall makes
sense, but it would be good to know what kind of QPS
Alex,
That's too slow. Can you provide more details about your schema, queries etc?
jds
On Jan 2, 2008 7:28 PM, Alex Benjamen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm very interested in sharing performance stats with those who have indeces
that
contain more than 10MM documents. It seems that the
Are you (or have you tried) breaking these queries up as a set of
filter queries?
fq=gender:ffq=( friends:y )fq= country:usfq= age:(18 || 19 || 20
|| 21)fq=photos:y
(mod correct syntax)
Should get you the same result but each fq is cached separately as a
bitset and future queries that
JDS:
That's too slow. Can you provide more details about your schema, queries etc?
Ofcourse - I'm using the standard config which comes with solr, and I've added
the following fields :
field name=id type=integer indexed=true stored=true required=true
/
field name=status type=text
I have created index using jetty and after that have created multiple webapp
with tomcat, data index folder is copied to webapps.
On 1/2/08, Ryan McKinley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you indexing files while tomcat is running? If so, are you sending
the commit/ message? If so, can you see
I have already running tomcat on server.
On 1/3/08, Norberto Meijome [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 16:25:58 +0530
Laxmilal Menaria [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have tried Solr using jetty, its run on command prompt, but now I want
to
comfigure solr on tomcat-6, so nay one
On 2-Jan-08, at 5:47 PM, Alex Benjamen wrote:
gender:m AND status:(2 || 8 || 6 || 3) AND age:(26 || 27 || 28 ||
29) AND orientation:3
gender:f AND age:(27 || 28 || 29 || 30 || 31 || 32 || 33 || 34 ||
35 || 36 ) AND orientation:2 AND photos:y
gender:f AND (activity:y) AND age:(28 || 29 ||
On 1-Jan-08, at 11:54 PM, climbingrose wrote:
Doc1: [Title=Java; Location=Parramatta, NSW; latitude=x1;
longitude=x2]
Doc2: [Title=Java; Location=North Ryde, NSW; latitude=x3;
longitude=x4]
Doc3: [Title=Java; Location=Parramatta]
My filter query looks like this:
fq= (+latitude[lat1 TO
Mike,
Thanks for the input, it's really valueable. Several forum users have suggested
using fq to separate
the caching of filters, and I can immediately see how this would help. I'm
changing the code right now
and going to run some benchmarks, hopefully see a big gain just from that
- use
Alex,
Not to be a pain, but the response I had when looking at the query
was, why not do this in a SQL database, which is designed precisely to
process this sort of request at speed? I've noticed that people
sometimes try to get Solr to act as a generalized information store --
I'm not sure
Have configured successfully and getting search results. Now I want to
configure solr on different Indexes with tomcat, Please let me how it is
possible.
On 1/3/08, Laxmilal Menaria [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have created index using jetty and after that have created multiple
webapp with
On 2-Jan-08, at 9:52 PM, Alex Benjamen wrote:
Thanks for the input, it's really valueable. Several forum users
have suggested using fq to separate
the caching of filters, and I can immediately see how this would
help. I'm changing the code right now
and going to run some benchmarks,
26 matches
Mail list logo
