I am trying to integrate JBOSS and Solr(multicore)
To get started, I am trying to deploy a single instance of solr.
1) I have Edited
C:/jboss/jboss-4.2.1.GA/server/default/conf/jboss-service.xml and entered
the following details:
mbean code=org.jboss.naming.JNDIBindingServiceMgr
Hello.
I enabled highlighting and it works perfect, but not for all queries.
For example if ?q=canon+powershot I get this response:
---
{
responseHeader:{
status:0,
QTime:4},
response:{numFound:296,start:0,maxScore:4.3135004,docs:[
Hello,
is there a chance to override the Similarity in my search ?
In fact I want that all result return a 1 (with the idf methode).
Greets -Ralf-
Hello,
is there a chance to override the Similarity in my search ?
In fact I want that all result return a 1 (with the idf methode).
Greets -Ralf-
Hi,
When I try to commit greek characters I've an error : Βίντεο ενός μεγάλου
αθλητικού τύπου από Kum
All over language works well, If I try the request manually on MySql it
works well, I tried as well with a little java function to write it in a
document and I get it back properly ... any Idea
Hello!
You can do it, by extending the DefaultSimilarity class from
org.apache.lucene.search package. After that, You need to add one line
to schema.xml file, which might look like this:
similarity class=com.company.CustomSimilarity /
After that, Solr will recognize Your new similarity class
Hi everybody,
I noticed that greek document wasn't there, so I tried to commit just one
document and checked it,
so I did a full import which inserted one document then I commit it
manually, checked the log, no error.
When I check my statistics I've : numDocs : 1, commits : 1.
But then When I
Hello,
Querry:
{wt=jsonrows=30json.nl=mapstart=0sort=RezeptName+asc}
Result :
Doppeldecker
Eiersalat
Curry - Eiersalat
Eiersalat
Why is my second Curry... after Doppeldecker ???
RezeptName is a normal text field defined as :
fieldType name=text class=solr.TextField
Hi all,
In my code, I'd like to keep a subset of my 14M docs which is around
100k large.
What is according to you the best option in terms of speed and memory usage ?
Some basic thoughts tells me the BitDocSet should be the fastest for
lookup, but takes ~ 14M * sizeof(int) in memory,
On Oct 28, 2008, at 6:33 AM, Kraus, Ralf | pixelhouse GmbH wrote:
is there a chance to override the Similarity in my search ?
In fact I want that all result return a 1 (with the idf methode).
Sure thing, see Solr 1.3.0's example/solr/conf/schema.xml
!-- Similarity is the scoring routine
Kraus, Ralf | pixelhouse GmbH schrieb:
Hello,
Querry:
{wt=jsonrows=30json.nl=mapstart=0sort=RezeptName+asc}
Result :
Doppeldecker
Eiersalat
Curry - Eiersalat
Eiersalat
Why is my second Curry... after Doppeldecker ???
RezeptName is a normal text field defined as :
fieldType name=text
I'm curious, why do you want to disable idf? --wunder
On 10/28/08 5:37 AM, Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 28, 2008, at 6:33 AM, Kraus, Ralf | pixelhouse GmbH wrote:
is there a chance to override the Similarity in my search ?
In fact I want that all result return a 1 (with the
You may want to take a very close look at what the WordDelimiterFilter
is doing. I believe the underscore is dropped entirely during indexing
AND searching as it's not alphanumeric.
Wiki doco here
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters?highlight=(t
Thomas Traeger schrieb:
Kraus, Ralf | pixelhouse GmbH schrieb:
Hello,
Querry:
{wt=jsonrows=30json.nl=mapstart=0sort=RezeptName+asc}
Result :
Doppeldecker
Eiersalat
Curry - Eiersalat
Eiersalat
Why is my second Curry... after Doppeldecker ???
RezeptName is a normal text field defined as :
Thanks for the reply. I've been looking at the debug page... and I
really don't see any clues there (maybe I don't know how to read it).
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
response
lst name=responseHeader
int name=status0/int
int name=QTime1/int
lst name=params
str name=wtstandard/str
str
These query parsing results don't match with the config you've posted.
Double-check the type of the name field and that you have restarted
Solr since changing the schema.xml
-Yonik
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Stephen Weiss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the reply. I've been looking
That's strange then. The schema hasn't changed in well over a month,
solr's been restarted several times since then to reload synonyms and
the whole thing was reindexed just this past week to add in new
chinese translations (the fields were already there but left blank).
?xml version=1.0
I'm wrong: I saw the punctuation being left in for m_* and thought
that the WordDelimiterFilter wasn't working.
So as Todd pointed out, underscores are dropped during indexing and
searching. The limitation you are running into is that things like
prefix and wildcard queries are not analyzed (so
OK, thanks everyone. Since this is the only thing this field is used
for, I think we'll just reindex without the filters and go from
there... Now if only I could just reindex that field! Oh well.
--
Steve
On Oct 28, 2008, at 3:32 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
I'm wrong: I saw the punctuation
I have a solr core having 2 million lengthy documents.
1. If I modify datatype of a field 'foo' from string to a sint and
restart the server, what would happen to the existing documents? And
documents added with the new schema? At query time (sort=foo desc),
should I expect the documents
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 1:55 AM, Nguyen, Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. If I modify datatype of a field 'foo' from string to a sint and
restart the server, what would happen to the existing documents? And
documents added with the new schema? At query time (sort=foo desc),
should I expect
Thanks for your quick reply.
What would be a reasonable way to handle this without affecting the end
users?
Create a new dynamic core with the new schema, load documents to the new
core, then swap the cores? At some moments, two mostly identical cores
co-exist on solr server, would that
Aha! The hint to the actual problem: When compressed with winzip. You are
running Solr on Windows.
Snapshots don't work on Windows: they depend on a Unix file system feature. You
may be copying the entire index. Not just that, it could be inconsistent.
This is a fine topic for a best practices
SITE is defined as integer. I wanted to select all document whose SITE=3002,
but SITE of the response was different.
field name=SITE type=integer indexed=true stored=true required=true/
http://localhost:8080/solr/mysite/select?indent=onqt=standardfl=SITEfq:SITE:3002
Never mind. I misused the syntax. :-)
-Original Message-
From: Nguyen, Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 7:00 Joe
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Query integer type
SITE is defined as integer. I wanted to select all document whose SITE=3002,
but
The new replication feature does not use any unix commands , it is
pure java. On the fly compression is hard but possible.
I wish to repeat the question. Did you optimize the index? Because a
10:1 compression is not usually observed in an optimized index. Our
own experiments showed compression of
bitdocset does not take ~ 14M * sizeof(int) in memory
it may take a maximum of
14M/8 bytes in memory ~= 1.75MB
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 6:06 PM, Jérôme Etévé [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
In my code, I'd like to keep a subset of my 14M docs which is around
100k large.
What is
27 matches
Mail list logo
