Hey there, I need to sort my query results alphabetically for a determinated
field called town. This field is analyzed with a KeywordAnalyzer and isn't
multiValued. Add that some docs doesn't doesn'h have this field.
Doing just:
There's a sortMissingLast true/false property that you can set on your
fielType definitions in the schema.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Marc Sturlese marc.sturl...@gmail.comwrote:
Hey there, I need to sort my query results alphabetically for a
determinated
field called town. This field
*release any SOLR resources - no need.*
My query is answered. Thank you.
Regards
Rahul
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Fuad Efendi f...@efendi.ca wrote:
Truly correct:
- SOLR does not create HttpSession for user access to Admin screens (do we
have any other screens of UI?)
- SolrCore is
Yes but I thought it was just for sortable fields: sint,sfloat,sdouble,slong.
Can I apply sortMissingLastto text fields analyzed with KeywordAnalyzer?
Constantijn Visinescu wrote:
There's a sortMissingLast true/false property that you can set on your
fielType definitions in the schema.
not 100% sure but the example schema has:
fieldType name=string class=solr.StrField sortMissingLast=true
omitNorms=true/
So i'd say give it a go and see what happens ;)
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Marc Sturlese marc.sturl...@gmail.comwrote:
Yes but I thought it was just for
Can you really sort accurately on tokenized fields?
Cheers
Avlesh
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Marc Sturlese marc.sturl...@gmail.comwrote:
Yes but I thought it was just for sortable fields:
sint,sfloat,sdouble,slong.
Can I apply sortMissingLastto text fields analyzed with
On Aug 24, 2009, at 7:03 AM, Avlesh Singh wrote:
Can you really sort accurately on tokenized fields?
Yes, as long as there is *one and only one* term emitted from the
analyzer. KeywordTokenizer is your friend, and comes in handy to
lowercase or pattern replace things.
Erik
Ah ... I just got wiser!
Thanks Erik.
Cheers
Avlesh
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Erik Hatcher erik.hatc...@gmail.comwrote:
On Aug 24, 2009, at 7:03 AM, Avlesh Singh wrote:
Can you really sort accurately on tokenized fields?
Yes, as long as there is *one and only one* term emitted
It just worked. Thanks a lot! Good to know sortMissingLast works not just in
sortable fields
Constantijn Visinescu wrote:
not 100% sure but the example schema has:
fieldType name=string class=solr.StrField sortMissingLast=true
omitNorms=true/
So i'd say give it a go and see what
Hi,
I would like to crawl intranets with nutch and index them with solr.
I would like to search mostly on the title of the pages (the one in
titleThis is a title/title)
I tried to tweak the schema.xml to do that but nothing is working. I
just have the content indexed.
How do I
I'd like to set up case insensitive matching on a facet.prefix, but would
like the facet handler to return the stored value rather than the indexed
value. For instance, if a field value is 'Yes', I'd like facet.prefix to
match on 'yes' but return 'Yes' - is this behavior possible to set up?
Hello
i created a custom request handler and i want it to do a search on features
and make field by default. i added the following decleration in my
solrconfig.xml file
requestHandler name=/def-features-make class=solr.SearchHandler
!-- default values for query parameters --
lst
I think you need a space, not a comma, in the qf parameter. It's
designed to allow for boosts, like qf=features^2.0 make^1.0
Erik
On Aug 24, 2009, at 1:13 PM, darniz wrote:
Hello
i created a custom request handler and i want it to do a search on
features
and make field by
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:43 PM, darniz rnizamud...@edmunds.com wrote:
Hello
i created a custom request handler and i want it to do a search on features
and make field by default. i added the following decleration in my
solrconfig.xml file
requestHandler name=/def-features-make
There are a couple of things about the Solr Thesaurus doc that I'd like to
confirm / understand.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#SynonymFilter
I believe the following section is a bit misleading; I'm sure it's correct
for the case it describes, but there's another case
Thanks Hoss and Yonik.
Hoss, you had a particluarly pertinent passage:
... because the normal Lucene QueryParser uses whitespace ...
and breaks up the input on the whitespace boundaries
before it ever passes those chunks ... to the analyzers
This is EXACTLY what the issue is. At first I
is there a parameter where i can flush out the browser cache. Most of the
time i see cached content in brower and i have to delete the temp files
folder.
You can disable cache in your browser. I think there is already a jira issue
to send no-cache headers to the client for all admin pages.
Hello,
I'm trying to use the schema browser (/file/?file=schema.xml) to examine the
schema of my solr installation, but am having problems with character
encodings. Everything I have is defined in UTF-8, and I can read the file
locally with that encoding without any problems. However, in the
Thanks. The fieldtype without the porter filter works for my case.
I appreciate your information very much.
Elaine
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Lance Norskoggoks...@gmail.com wrote:
These text types 'stem' the words arabic, arabian, and arabs to 'arab'.
Hi,
I have two questions.
1) Can solr be configured so all my english docs will be saved in a
group, say group-en? My chinese docs will be saved in group-cn. So my
search will only be conducted in the intended group, instead of
everywhere.
2) I posted some chinese docs to the server. The query
Here's the best thread I've found so far about multi-word matching and
synonyms:
http://www.nabble.com/solr-synonyms-behaviour-ts15051211.html#a18476205
And an interesting workaround:
http://www.nabble.com/solr-synonyms-behaviour-ts15051211.html#a18693735
Earlier on the thread repeats the claim
Hopefully, someone can tell me what is going wrong here.
I have a field, SearchObjectType, and a large number of the documents
indexed in a give core have a value of USER_PROFILE.
When I examine the schema browser in admin, it confirms this. The term
USER_PROFILE is the top term for this
How did you configure nutch?
Make sure you have the parse-html and index-basic configured. The
HtmlParser should by default extract the page title and add to the
parsed data, and the BasicIndexingFilter by default adds this title to
the NutchDocument and stores it in the title filed. All the
Hello all.
We have a situation in the requirements for our project that make it
desireable to be able to perform a DisMax query with wildcard (* and ?)
characters in it.
We are using the standard release (not nightly) of Solr 1.3.
Our first thought was to apply the SOLR-756 patch
Is SolrIndex plugin for Nutch?
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Uri Boness [mailto:ubon...@gmail.com]
Sent: August-24-09 4:42 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: solr nutch url indexing
How did you configure nutch?
Make sure you have the parse-html and index-basic
I can think of ways to tackle your problem:
Option 1: each document will have a field indicating its language. Then,
when searching, you can simply filter the query on the language you're
searching on. Advantages: everything is in one index, so if in the
future you will need to do a cross
I would like to announce the September-2009 Hadoop Get Together in newthinking
store Berlin.
When: 29. September 2009 at 5:00pm
Where: newthinking store, Tucholskystr. 48, Berlin, Germany
As always there will be slots of 20min each for talks on your Hadoop topic.
After each
I am seeing our responses getting truncated if and only if I search on
our main text field.
E.g. I just do some basic like
title_t:arthritis
Then I get a valid document back. But if I add in our larger text field:
title_t:arthritis OR text_t:arthritis
then the resultant document is NOT valid
hello *, im currently faceting on a shingled field to obtain popular
phrases and its working well, however ide like to limit the number of
shingles that get created, the solr.ShingleFilterFactory supports
maxShingleSize, can it be made to support a minimum as well? can
someone point me in the
It can very well be an issue with the data itself. For example, if the
data contains un-escaped characters which invalidates the response. I
don't know much about ruby, but what do you get with wt=json?
Rupert Fiasco wrote:
I am seeing our responses getting truncated if and only if I search
Continuing on this i am having a use case where i have to strip out single
quote for certain fields for example for testing i added teh following
fieldType in schema.xml file
fieldType name=removeComma class=solr.TextField
analyzer
tokenizer
Suppose I have a database of rectangle attributes that I have indexed in Solr
and I want to get the top 10 widest or longest rectangles from one query.
name | width | length
A | 100| 10
B | 10 | 90
C | 80 | 10
...
My indexed fields are: name, width, length
If my query is something like manufacturer:IBM OR productTitle:Thinkpad, I
actually just want to printout IBM or Thinkpad in any of the highlighted
fields. I don't want to parse through any HTML or other text. Basically, I just
want to know which of the terms in my query matched and in which
New to Solr, not so new to search. I have an existing data model that I am
pushing into a Solr index. For example, I am indexing a product which includes
product brochures in multiple locales. So this single Solr document contains
multiple text fields which require linguistics analyzers.
HI
i dont understand whats wrong here.
i am trying to implement solr.StopFilterFactory
here is my field type definition
fieldtype name=teststop class=solr.TextField
analyzer type=index
tokenizer class=solr.LowerCaseTokenizerFactory/
filter
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 8:58 PM, darnizrnizamud...@edmunds.com wrote:
HI
i dont understand whats wrong here.
i am trying to implement solr.StopFilterFactory
here is my field type definition
fieldtype name=teststop class=solr.TextField
analyzer type=index
tokenizer
How about using sum() FunctionQuery, via:
http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=_val_%3A%22sum%28width%2Clength%29%22
Thanks,
Koji
Erik Earle wrote:
Suppose I have a database of rectangle attributes that I have indexed in Solr
and I want to get the top 10 widest or longest rectangles from
Hi,
Can any one helpe me with the below scenario?.
Scenario 1:
Assume that I give Google as input string
i am using Carrot with Solr
Carrot is for front end display purpose
the issue is
Assuming i give BHASKAR as input string
It should give me search results pertaining to BHASKAR only.
smock wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to use the schema browser (/file/?file=schema.xml) to examine the
schema of my solr installation, but am having problems with character
encodings. Everything I have is defined in UTF-8, and I can read the file
locally with that encoding without any problems.
Clever... but if more than one row adds up to the same value I may get the
wrong order (like 50, 50 and 10, 90)
I need a max function but the one provided only compares against a constant.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 24, 2009, at 6:15 PM, Koji Sekiguchi k...@r.email.ne.jp wrote:
How about
Hi,
Can any one helpe me with the below scenario?.
Scenario 1:
Assume that I give Google as input string
i am using Carrot with Solr
Carrot is for front end display purpose
the issue is
Assuming i give BHASKAR as input string
It should give me search results pertaining to BHASKAR only.
Hi All,
I am tinkering with MoreLikeThis component of Solr and had a particular use
case where I would like to exclude certain terms from consideration while
MoreLikeThis makes a query vector out of a document. Is it possible with
Solr? I searched for this in the documentation but wasn't able to
42 matches
Mail list logo