Hi,
I'm a newbie and have a question about the text that is stored and then
returned from a query. The field in question is of type "text", is indexed and
stored. The original text included various blank lines (line feeds), but when
the text field is returned as the result from a query, all of
: > 1) adding something like: q=cat_id:xxx&fq=geo_id= would boost
: > performance?
:
:
: For the n > 1 query, yes, adding filters should improve performance
: assuming it is selective enough. The tradeoff is memory.
You might even find that something like this is faster...
q=*:*&fq=c
: Our QParser plugin will perform queries against directory documents and
: return any file document that has the matching directory id(s). So the
: plugin transforms the query to something like
:
: q:+(directory_id:4 directory:10) +directory_id:(4)
...
: Currently the parser plugin is
:
: I'm using facet.field=lbrand and do get good results for eg: Geomax, GeoMax,
: GEOMAX all of them falls into "geomax". But when I'm filtering I do get
: strange results:
:
: brand:geomax gives numFound="0"
: lbrand:geomax gives numFound="57" (GEOMAX, GeoMag, Geomag)
:
: How should I redef
Israel,
> If you downloaded the 1.3.0 release, you should find a "docs"
> folder inside the zip file.
>
> This contains the javadoc for that particular release.
>
> You may also re download a 1.3.0 release to get the docs for Solr 1.3.
This doesn't solve my problem. I can't write my javadoc c
Yes, you can tag filters using the new local params format and then
explicitly exclude them when providing the facet fields. see:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters#Tagging_and_excluding_Filters
Cheers,
Uri
Mat Brown wrote:
Hi all,
Just wondering if it's possible to do filter
I store document in a field "content" field defiend as follow in schema.xml
and following in solrconfig.xml
content
content
I want to store only "content" into this field but it store other meta data
of a document e.g. "Author", "timestamp", "document type" etc. how ca
Hello,
I had this question to ask regarding building of a Solr query . On the solr
server running on a linux box my query that returns results is as follows ,
this one of course returns the search results
http://ncbu-cam35-2:17003/apache-solr-1.4.0/profile/select/?q=Bangalore&version=2.2&start=
Hello,
I had this question to ask regarding building of a Solr query . On the solr
server running on a linux box my query that returns results is as follows ,
this one of course returns the search results
http://ncbu-cam35-2:17003/apache-solr-1.4.0/profile/select/?q=Bangalore&version=2.2&start=
Do you get the same behavior if you search for "gang" instead of "gets"?
I'm wondering if there's something going on with stemEnglishPossesive.
According to the docs you *should* be OK since you set
setmEnglishPosessive=0,
but this would help point in the right direction.
Also, am I correct in as
Chris Hostetter wrote:
See Also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thread_hijacking
You may want to update that link, since that wikipedia page has been
deleted for some time.
cheers
stuart
--
Stuart Yeates
http://www.nzetc.org/ New Zealand Electronic Text Centre
http://researcharchive.vuw
: Ej.: "q=something field:value" becomes "q=something value&fq=field:value"
:
: To do this, in the createParser method, I apply a regular expression
: to the qstr param to obtain the fq part, and then I do the following:
:
: NamedList paramsList = params.toNamedList();
: paramsList.add(CommonPar
Thanks for the reply, just what I was looking for in answer. I am running
under Tomcat 6 on Solaris 10, the person that replied before you looks like
they running under jetty. I have configured jndi context. I stop and start
tomcat using the Solaris SMF, equivalent to services in linux. But
: Subject: Log of zero result searches
: References: <26747482.p...@talk.nabble.com> <26748588.p...@talk.nabble.com>
: <359a9283091203m73b4dc9ya51aa97e460b3...@mail.gmail.com>
: <26756663.p...@talk.nabble.com> <26776651.p...@talk.nabble.com>
: <359a92830912141657r79881e4bg3a4370d81e
2009/12/15 Teruhiko Kurosaka
> Lucene keeps multiple versions of its API doc online at
> http://lucene.apache.org/java/X_Y_Z/api/all/index.html
> for version X.Y.Z. I am finding this very useful when
> comparing different versions. This is also good because
> the javadoc comments that I write f
: Does anyone know of a good way to perform a reverse-sorted facet query (i.e.
rarest first)?
I'm fairly confident that code doesn't exist at the moment.
If i remember correctly, it would be fairly simply to implement if you'd
like to submit a patch: when sorting by count a simple bounded p
: i want to store dates into a date field called publish date in solr.
: how do we do it using solrj
I'm pretty sure that when indexing docs, you can add Date objects directly
to the SolrInputDocument as field values -- but 'm not 100% certain (i
don't use SolrJ much)
: likewise ho
Hi all,
Just wondering if it's possible to do filter exclusion (i.e.,
multiselect faceting) on query facets in Solr 1.4?
Thanks!
Mat
: My first problem appears because I need suggestions inclusive when the
: expression has returned results. It's seems that only appear
: suggestions when there are no results. Is there a way to do so?
can you give us an example of what your queries look like? with the
example configs, i can ge
: I'm having trouble getting Solr to use more than one thread during index
: optimizations. I have the following in my solrconfig.xml:
:
: 6
:
How many segments do you have?
I'm not an expert on segment merging, but i'm pretty sure the number of
threads it will use is limit
im trying to do a wild card search
"q":"item_title:(gets*)"returns no results
"q":"item_title:(gets)"returns results
"q":"item_title:(get*)"returns results
seems like * at the end of a token is requiring a character, instead
of being 0 or more its acting like1 or more
the text im tr
Hi
It appears that Solr reads a synonym list at startup from a text file.
Is it possible to alter this behaviour so that Solr obtains the synonym list
from a database instead?
Thanks,
Peter
> Hi All,
>
> I have a custom filter for lucene ,Can
> anyone help me how to use this
> in SOLR.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPlugins#Tokenizer_and_TokenFilter
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPlugins#Analyzer
Lucene keeps multiple versions of its API doc online at
http://lucene.apache.org/java/X_Y_Z/api/all/index.html
for version X.Y.Z. I am finding this very useful when
comparing different versions. This is also good because
the javadoc comments that I write for my software can
reference the API com
Hi All,
I have a custom filter for lucene ,Can anyone help me how to use this
in SOLR.
Thanks in advance,
Pavan
Hi!
I wrote a subclass of DisMaxQParserPlugin to add a little filter for
processing the "q" param and generate a "fq" param.
Ej.: "q=something field:value" becomes "q=something value&fq=field:value"
To do this, in the createParser method, I apply a regular expression
to the qstr param to obtain th
Hi Rafael,
Rafael Pappert wrote:
I try to enable the spellchecker in my 1.4.0 solr (running with tomcat 6 on
debian).
But I always get the following exception, when I try to open
http://localhost:8080/spell?:
The spellcheck=true pair is missing in your request. Try
http://localh
Hello List,
I try to enable the spellchecker in my 1.4.0 solr (running with tomcat 6 on
debian).
But I always get the following exception, when I try to open
http://localhost:8080/spell?:
HTTP Status 500 - null java.lang.NullPointerException at
java.io.StringReader.(StringReader.java:33)
Erick,
I know what you mean.
Wonder if it is actually cleaner to keep the authorization model out of
solr index and filter the data at client side based on the user access
rights.
Thanks all for help.
Erick Erickson wrote:
>
> Yes, that should work. One hard part is what happens if your
> a
Yes, that should work. One hard part is what happens if your
authorization model has groups, especially when membership
in those groups changes. Then you have to go in and update
all the affected docs.
FWIW
Erick
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:24 PM, caman wrote:
>
> Shalin,
>
> Thanks. much app
Shalin,
Thanks. much appreciated.
Question about:
"That is usually what people do. The hard part is when some documents are
shared across multiple users. "
What do you recommend when documents has to be shared across multiple users?
Can't I just multivalue a field with all the users who has ac
Lucene 2.9.1 comes with a PayloadTermQuery:
http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_9_1/api/all/org/apache/lucene/search/payloads/PayloadTermQuery.html
I have been using that to use the payload as part of the score without any
problem.
Bill
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 6:31 AM, Raghuveer Kancherla <
raghuve
In the end, the PHP client does a file_get_contents for doing a
search the same way you'd do it "manually". It's all PHP, so you can
do anything it does yourself. It provides what any library of PHP
classes should - convenience. I use the JSON response writer because
it gets the most atten
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Faire Mii wrote:
> i am using php to access solr and i wonder one thing.
>
> why should i use solr php client when i can use
>
> $serializedResult = file_get_contents('http://localhost:8983/solr/
> select?q=niklas&wt=phps');
>
> to get the result in arrays and the
i am using php to access solr and i wonder one thing.
why should i use solr php client when i can use
$serializedResult = file_get_contents('http://localhost:8983/solr/
select?q=niklas&wt=phps');
to get the result in arrays and then print them out?
i dont really get the difference. is there
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Faire Mii wrote:
> i have two fields:
>
> title
> body
>
> and i want to search for two words
>
> dog
> OR
> cat
>
> in each of them.
>
> i have tried q=*:dog OR cat
>
> but it doesnt work.
>
> how should i type it?
>
> PS. could i enter default search field = ALL
i have two fields:
title
body
and i want to search for two words
dog
OR
cat
in each of them.
i have tried q=*:dog OR cat
but it doesnt work.
how should i type it?
PS. could i enter default search field = ALL fields in schema.xml in
someway?
The interesting thing I am noticing is that the scoring works fine for a
phrase query like "solr rocks".
This lead me to look at what query I am using in case of a single term.
Turns out that I am using PayloadTermQuery taking a cue from solr-1485
patch.
I changed this to BoostingTermQuery (i read
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Phanindra Reva wrote:
> Hello..,
> I have observed that the text or keywords which are being
> indexed using dynamicField concept are being searchable only when we
> mention field name too while querying.Am I wrong with my observation
> or is it the de
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Roland Villemoes
wrote:
> Yes, correct.
>
> But to use that - the search client must collect this information whenever
> we have "0" results.
> I do not want that to be part of the client application (quite hard when
> that is SolrJS) - this should be collected se
I've only just started with Solr too.
As a newbie, first I'd say forget about trying to "compare" it to your mysql
database.
It's completely different and performs it's own job in it's own way. You
feed a document in, and you store that information in the most efficient
manner you can to perfor
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:13 PM, bharath venkatesh <
bharath.venkat...@ibibogroup.com> wrote:
> Hi ,
> Is there any limit in no of values stored in a single multi valued
> string field ?
There is no limit theoretical limit. There are practical limits because your
documents are heavier. The
Hi ,
Is there any limit in no of values stored in a single multi
valued string field ? if a single multi valued string field contains
1000-2000 string values what will be effect on query performance (we
will be only indexing this field not storing it ) ? is it better to
store all the s
Hi, thanks! I've done it by wrote a scripts to call
http://localhost:8080/solr/dataimport?command=delta-import automatically:-)
Joel Nylund wrote:
>
> windows or unix?
>
> unix - make a shell script and call it from cron
>
> windows - make a .bat or .cmd file and call it from scheduler
>
> w
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 7:17 PM, kalidoss <
kalidoss.muthuramalin...@sifycorp.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have enabled the query result cache, its 512 entries,
>
> we have calculated the size used for cache :
> page size about 1000bytes, (1000*512)/1024/1024 = .48MB
>
>
The query result ca
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:07 AM, insaneyogi3008 wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am running a simple prg
> http://old.nabble.com/file/p26779970/SolrjTest.java SolrjTest.java to get
> search results from a remote Solr server , I seem to correctly get back the
> number of documents that match my query , but
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 7:26 AM, caman wrote:
>
> Appreciate any guidance here please. Have a master-child table between two
> tables 'TA' and 'TB' where form is the master table. Any row in TA can have
> multiple row in TB.
> e.g. row in TA
>
> id---name
> 1---tweets
>
> TB:
> id|ta_id|field0|fie
Yes, correct.
But to use that - the search client must collect this information whenever we
have "0" results.
I do not want that to be part of the client application (quite hard when that
is SolrJS) - this should be collected server site - on Solr.
Do you know how to do that?
Roland
-Op
The returning XML result tag has a numFound attribute that will report
0 if nothing matches your search criteria
David
On 15 Dec 2009, at 08:16, Roland Villemoes
wrote:
Hi
Question: How do you log zero result searches?
I quite important from a business perspective to know what searches
Hi,
The answer is "it depends" ;)
If your 10 tables represent an entity e.g a person their address etc
the one document entity works
But if your 10 tables each represnt a series of entites that you want
to surface in your search results separately then make a document for
each (I.e it de
Hi
Question: How do you log zero result searches?
I quite important from a business perspective to know what searches that
returns zero/empty results.
Does anybody know a way to get this information?
Roland Villemoes
I just cant get it.
If i got 10 tables in mysql and they are all related to eachother with
foreign keys. Should i have 10 documents in solr?
or just one document with rows from all tables in it?
i have tried in vain for 2 days now...plz help
regards
fayer
52 matches
Mail list logo