There's no option to do this with the standard query parser, though
you can easily subclass it and override getPrefixQuery (term* queries)
and getWildcardQuery (for any other terms that have * or % in them) to
throw an exception or convert it to a different type of query.
However, maybe
Solr has the DataImportHandler framework that allows a straightforward
configuration to control indexing from any relational database (with
JDBC support). See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler for
details.
If you did go the Java route (though not recommended at this point),
We need more details to evaluate - what exactly are you trying to
accomplish?
I'd tend towards the token filter approach since it would be more
general purpose for other indexing routes.
Erik
On Jan 28, 2010, at 2:10 AM, Abin Mathew wrote:
Hi
When the same thing can be done
Hello.
I read the FAQ entry about rebuilding the index,
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FAQ#How_can_I_rebuild_my_index_from_scratch_if_I_change_my_schema.3F
but it is not clear about the times when this is needed. So I wonder, do I
need to do it after adding a field, removing a field, changing
Hi,
Can we Integrate solr with katta?
In order to overcome the limitations of Solr in distributed search, I need
to integrate katta with solr, without loosing any features of Solr.
Any Suggestions?
Any help appreciated.
Thanks,
Sudharshan
Windows
I mention below that I user windows server 2008
-Original Message-
From: Lance Norskog [mailto:goks...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 3:46 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: solr with tomcat in cluster mode
Linux includes a load-balancer program
Okay, I changed my entity to look like this (have included my main entity as
well):
document name=ArticleDocument
entity name=article pk=CmsArticleId
query=Select * from vArticleSummaryDetail_SolrSearch (nolock)
WHERE ArticleStatusId = 1
entity
Hi,
I am new to Solr. I found facets fields does not reflect the original
string in the record. For example,
the returned xml is,
- doc
str name=g_numberG-EUPE/str
/doc
- lst name=facet_counts
lst name=facet_queries /
- lst name=facet_fields
- lst name=g_number
int
have a look:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1395
V SudershanReddy wrote:
Hi,
Can we Integrate solr with katta?
In order to overcome the limitations of Solr in distributed search, I
need
to integrate katta with solr, without loosing any features of Solr.
Hi,
probably, it's because of stemming
if you need unstemmed text you can use 'textgen' data type for the field
Sergey
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Solr user uma.ravind...@yahoo.co.inwrote:
Hi,
I am new to Solr. I found facets fields does not reflect the original
string in the
Say I have a clothes store, i have ladies clothes, mens clothes
when someone searches for clothes, i want to prioritize mens clothing
results,
how can I achieve this ?
this logic should only apply for this keyword, other keywords should work
as-is
should I be trying with something on synonyms
Look at Payload.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 6:48 AM, murali k ilar...@gmail.com wrote:
Say I have a clothes store, i have ladies clothes, mens clothes
when someone searches for clothes, i want to prioritize mens clothing
results,
how can I achieve this ?
this logic should only apply for this
http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/08/05/getting-started-with-payloads/
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 6:54 AM, Shashi Kant sk...@sloan.mit.edu wrote:
Look at Payload.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 6:48 AM, murali k ilar...@gmail.com wrote:
Say I have a clothes store, i have ladies clothes, mens
It's always a good thing if you can check the debug log (fx catalina.out) or
run with debug/verbose to check how Solr runs trough the dataconfig.
You've also made a typo in the pk and query, LinkedCatAricleId is missing
a t.
/Rolf
Den 2010-01-28 11.20, skrev KirstyS kirst...@gmail.com:
Thanks,
I saw that mistake and I have it working now!!! thank you for all your help.
Out of interest, is the cacheKey and cacheLookup documented anywhere?
Rolf Johansson-2 wrote:
It's always a good thing if you can check the debug log (fx catalina.out)
or
run with debug/verbose to check
Hi
I am back again with further queries.
Just to check whether caching helps in rectifying our problem, we did a
simple test:
Restarted solr slave and executed one of the heavy queries immediately to
test the query response time. It was again high, somewhat about 700 ms,
which means now no
Hi everybody. I'm trying to build apache-solr *webapp* (not the whole
project) using maven . Also want to reuse the build.xml ant file.
The directory structure is:
+build
+client
+contrib
.
+src
+webapp/src --webapp code
+dist --generated artifacts by the ant script
--must be copied
Please forgive my ignorance, but I am still quite the newbie to both Lucene
and Solr. I was hoping to start by getting a simple example working in SOLR
and then iterate towards the more complex, given this is my first attempt at
extending Solr.
For my first iteration of SpanQuery in Solr I am
We've been building a UI which displays the results in a tabular formate, so
each of the fields that are available for search are presented to the user. We
still discussing where it's best to sort this out in our overall system design,
such as the UI or application layer. Given our current
OK, that makes sense. I'd deal with this on the UI side personally.
My reasoning is that it's poor design to make you search server
jump through hoops because you want to write client-side code
that can ignore edge cases. The UI changes and now you have
to go back to the search code to accommodate
Thanks a lot everybody for the responses ... I am going to do some
practical/empirical testing and will report
matt
--- On Wed, 1/27/10, Tom Hill solr-l...@worldware.com wrote:
From: Tom Hill solr-l...@worldware.com
Subject: Re: Multiple Cores Vs. Single Core for the following use case
To:
You can use the Luke request handler to request all the fields in the
index, in case that helps with your UI. Solr's Schema Browser uses
that request handler to introspect. And Solr Flare also uses it to
figure out which fields to show as facets.
Erik
On Jan 28, 2010, at 10:08
facets are based off the indexed version of your string nor the stored
version, you probably have an analyzer thats removing punctuation,
most people index the same field multiple ways for different purposes,
matching. storting, faceting etc...
index a copy of your field as string type and facet
Hi,
My question is about crawling, I know this is not relevant here, but I asked
nutch people, didn't get any response, I just thought of posing here,
I'm trying to crawl reviews for business,
a. is there any way to tell the content in a web pages are reviews or not?
Is it possible to do it
Classification? - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Document_classification
Cheers
Avlesh
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 1:18 AM, ram_sj rpachaiyap...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
My question is about crawling, I know this is not relevant here, but I
asked
nutch people, didn't get any response, I just
Hi,
We're using the new replication and it's working pretty well. There's
one detail I'd like to get some more information about.
As the replication works, it creates versions of the index in the data
directory. Originally we had index/, but now there are dated versions
such as
Hi Reddy,
What's the limitation you're running into?
Jason
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 2:15 AM, V SudershanReddy vsre...@huawei.com wrote:
Hi,
Can we Integrate solr with katta?
In order to overcome the limitations of Solr in distributed search, I need
to integrate katta with solr, without
I am observing very weird text stripping issue.
when I search for word Search I get following
doc
str name=descriptionIssue 18 Search String/str
int name=key4688/int
str name=titleIssue 18 Search String2/str
/doc
And highliting node
lst name=4688
arr name=title
strIssue 18
We'd like to implement a profanity detector for documents during indexing.
That is, given a file of profane words, we'd like to be able to mark a
document as safe or not safe if it contains any of those words so that we
can have something similar to google's safe search.
I'm trying to figure out
Thanks Yonik,
I think commiting code to solr would not fix the problem. I don't want to
have to go through the HTTP stack to create an index. I need to create
various indices with different params for testing purposes. In this case,
its easiest to just use lucene.
I used the
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 4:58 PM, brad anderson solrinter...@gmail.com wrote:
I think commiting code to solr would not fix the problem. I don't want to
have to go through the HTTP stack to create an index.
Why not? If you use something like SolrJ, it's an implementation
detail if there is a
How about this crazy idea - a custom TokenFilter that stores the safe flag in
ThreadLocal?
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Hadoop ecosystem search :: http://search-hadoop.com/
- Original Message
From: Mike Perham mper...@onespot.com
To:
I like the embedded solr client suggestion. I'll try that one out. I don't
think sending a CSV file will work for my case, I will have to go generate a
CSV then index the CSV, as opposed to indexing while generating my content.
Thanks
2010/1/28 Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.com
On Thu,
Hi, Chris, thanks for suggestions.
q=ipodbq={!dismax qf=userId^0.5 v=$qq}qq=12345qt=dismax
I've tried your suggested query above, unfortunately, it does not work out.
I glanced a bit on the error message, the Infinite Recursion error seems
that dismax query parser are adding bq multiple times.
Is it problematic when I use dismax as additional boost query with bq params
of upper level dismax query?
My purpose is very simple, I wanna use dismax query to search title and
content text fields while I still wanna boost it with another field value
which is the original intetion why the bq
2010/1/28 Wangsheng Mei hairr...@gmail.com:
q=ipodbq={!dismax qf=userId^0.5 v=$qq}qq=12345qt=dismax
I've tried your suggested query above, unfortunately, it does not work out.
I glanced a bit on the error message, the Infinite Recursion error seems
that dismax query parser are adding bq
nice trick, Yonik.[?]
2010/1/29 Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.com
2010/1/28 Wangsheng Mei hairr...@gmail.com:
q=ipodbq={!dismax qf=userId^0.5 v=$qq}qq=12345qt=dismax
I've tried your suggested query above, unfortunately, it does not work
out.
I glanced a bit on the error message,
Resolved by yonik's suggestion by adding an empty bq inside the embeded
dismax:
http://myhost/solr/select?q=ipodbq={!dismax%20qf=userIdhttp://myhost/solr/select?q=ipodbq=%7B%21dismax%20qf=userId^0.5%20v=$qq
bq=}qq=123qt=dismax
2010/1/29 Wangsheng Mei hairr...@gmail.com
Hi, All.
I have
Check you analyzers
Ankit
-Original Message-
From: javaxmlsoapdev [mailto:vika...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 4:46 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: weird text stripping issue
I am observing very weird text stripping issue.
when I search for word Search I
Hi Sergey,
In schema.xml, i have got by default
!-- A general unstemmed text field - good if one does not know the
language of the field --^M
fieldType name=textgen class=solr.TextField
positionIncrementGap=100^M
analyzer type=index^M
tokenizer
Thanks, Otis. Responses inline.
Hi,
We're using the new replication and it's working pretty well.
There's one detail
I'd like to get some more information about.
As the replication works, it creates versions of the index in the
data
directory. Originally we had index/, but now there are
Analyzers are default. anything in particular to look for?
ANKITBHATNAGAR wrote:
Check you analyzers
Ankit
-Original Message-
From: javaxmlsoapdev [mailto:vika...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 4:46 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: weird text
Although infinite recursion is disappeared, there is another problem.
q=ipodbq={!dismax qf=userId^0.5 v=$qq bq=}qq=12345qt=dismaxdebugQuery=on
I try to debug the above query, it turned out to be as:
+DisjunctionMaxQuery((content:ipod | title:ipod^4.0)~0.01) ()
Default doesn't tell us much, especially since you haven't
told us what version you're using. Please post the relevant
parts of your schema. That said, WordDelimiterFilterFactory
is a popular one to mis-interpret, see:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters
HTH
Erick
On Thu,
My documents have a field expiration that is the expiration date of that doc.
I want to give a boost to all documents that haven't expired. I still want to
have expired documents returned, but unexpired documents should be given
priority.
Ideally the boost amount for all unexpired documents
I am curious how I can query for multi-term phrases using the
TermsComponent?
The field I am searching has been shingled so it contains 2 and 3 word
phrases.
For example in the sample results below I want to only get back multi-word
phrases such as table of contents and under the but not
Ah, ok. There may be a load-balancer program for Windows. Also, the
SolrJ client library includes a feature to load-balance its requests.
If you write your app using this library, you're set.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 2:17 AM, ZAROGKIKAS,GIORGOS
g.zarogki...@multirama.gr wrote:
Windows
I
The listener firstSearcher and nextSearcher events describe queries
to run when Solr starts and when receives an updated index. When you
start Solr, the firstSearch queries are immediately run.
You should put queries there that you want to warm up for your
searches. For example, the date range
You could have a synonym file that, for each dirty word, changes the
word into an impossible word: for example, xyzzy. Then, a search for
clean contents is:
(user search) AND NOT xyzzy
A synonym filter that included payloads would be cool.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Otis Gospodnetic
Thanks for pointing this out. The wiki had a problem fro a while and
we could not update the documentation. It is updated here
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#cached
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 6:31 PM, KirstyS kirst...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks,
I saw that mistake and I have it
After you change the schema.xml file, you have to rebuild the index
completely. At that point, g_number fields should not be stemmed.
You can examine what these text field types do.
the index.20100127044500/ is a temp directory should have got cleaned
up if there was no problem in replication (see the logs if there was a
problem) . if there is a problem the temp directory will be used as
the new index directory and the old one will no more be used.at any
given point only one
Hi I want to generate my own customized query from the input string entered
by the user. It should look something like this
*Search field : Microsoft*
*
Generated Query* :
description:microsoft +((tags:microsoft^1.5 title:microsoft^3.0
role:microsoft requi
rement:microsoft company:microsoft
You add a range query on the date, and boost documents within that
date range. Check out the 'boost query' feature of dismax.
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/CDRG_ch07_7.4.2.9
It's also possible with the standard query parser but a pain in the neck:
(value)^2 OR (NOT value)
Ah, thank you!
--- On Fri, 1/29/10, Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: boosting unexpired documents
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Friday, January 29, 2010, 12:32 AM
You add a range query on the date,
and boost documents
55 matches
Mail list logo
