Thanks so much Otis. This is working great.
Now, I'm trying to make facets on pictures: display doc w/ pic vs. doc w/o pic
To the best of my knowledge, everyone is saying that faceting cannot be done on
dynamic fields (only on definitive field names). Thus, I tried the following
and it's
You can treat dynamic fields like any other field, so you can facet, sort,
filter, etc on these fields (afaik)
I believe the confusion arises that sometimes the usecase for dynamic fields
seems to be ill-understood, i.e: to be able to use them to do some kind of
wildcard search, e.g: search for a
Thanks Geert-Jan for the detailed answer. Actually, I don't search at all on
these fields. I'm only filtering (w/ vs w/ pic) and sorting (based on the
number of pictures). Thus, your suggestion of adding an extra field NrOfPics
[0,N] would be the best solution.
Regarding the other suggestion:
If I understand your suggestion correctly, you said that there's NO need to
have many Dynamic Fields; instead, we can have one definitive field name,
which can store a long string (concatenation of information about tens of
pictures), e.g., using - and % delimiters:
btw, be careful with you delimiters: pic_url may possibly contain a '-',
etc.
2010/6/26 Geert-Jan Brits gbr...@gmail.com
If I understand your suggestion correctly, you said that there's NO need
to have many Dynamic Fields; instead, we can have one definitive field name,
which can store a long
Thanks Geert-Jan, this is indeed very helpful.
The delimiters I gave were just for the need of the example. I will use non
frequent delimiter.
Cheers,
-Saïd
On Jun 26, 2010, at 1:53 PM, Geert-Jan Brits wrote:
If I understand your suggestion correctly, you said that there's NO need to
have
I supose you use BatchSize=-1 to index that amount of data. Up from 5.1.7
connector there's this param:
netTimeoutForStreamingResults
The default value is 600. Increasing that maybe can help (2400 for example?)
--
View this message in context:
I'm struggling with this very same problem. I can index the example files
fine. When I try adding a custom file, it appears to index without issue;
but I get no search results via the admin console. I've also tried
modifying one of the files (monitor.xml); it also did not update. I'm using
Hi,
Form googling and looking at jira tickets it seems like phrase highlighting
should work out of the box, but even enabling it manually didnt get me the
desired result:
http://resolutionfinder.org/search?q=%22security+council%22=tm=anys=Search
generates the following query:
INFO:
(10/06/26 22:19), Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
Hi,
Form googling and looking at jira tickets it seems like phrase highlighting
should work out of the box, but even enabling it manually didnt get me the
desired result:
http://resolutionfinder.org/search?q=%22security+council%22=tm=anys=Search
On 26.06.2010, at 16:22, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
(10/06/26 22:19), Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
Hi,
Form googling and looking at jira tickets it seems like phrase highlighting
should work out of the box, but even enabling it manually didnt get me the
desired result:
On 26.06.2010, at 16:30, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
On 26.06.2010, at 16:22, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
(10/06/26 22:19), Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
Hi,
Form googling and looking at jira tickets it seems like phrase highlighting
should work out of the box, but even enabling it manually didnt
Hello,
I am following the example at
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtractingRequestHandler
I am using Windows XP, curl 7.19.5, Solr 1.4.1
the command is:
curl http://localhost:8983/solr/update/extract?literal.id=doc1commit=true' -F
myfi...@tutorial.pdf
I got error :
HTTP Error: 400.
The first place you should go for this type of question is the
solr admin page and look at what's actually in your index.
A very handy tool for this is also Luke. Get a copy of it (google
Lucene Luke) and point it at your index and poke around
to see if what's actually in your index is what you
Hi all,
I've been working with Solr for while and the search components work as
expected.
Recently I've had the requirement to do searching on partial words and I
setup the NGramFilterFactory.
My schema.xml is as follows :
fieldType name=nGram class=solr.TextField
yes, you need to use ngramfilter at query-time too.
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Indika Tantrigoda indik...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi all,
I've been working with Solr for while and the search components work as
expected.
Recently I've had the requirement to do searching on partial words and I
Greetings,
I am new to Solr, but have gotten as far as successfully indexing
documents both by sending XML describing the document and by sending the
document itself using update/extract. What I want to do now is, in
effect, do both of these on each of my documents. I want to be able to
Thanks, Erik.
I downloaded Luke and pointed it to my index. I can see the data I indexed
via Luke, but still can't query it through the admin console. I queried for
ZS1 and still got no results, but when I look at the index via Luke, I
see the document was indexed. I'm stumped.
Jeff
On
To add to my last, when I query *:* I get the results I expect, but if I
query a term (ZS2) it doesn't find any matches. I must be missing
something simple. I'm new to solr, so it's possible I just don't understand
how to query it.
Jeff
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Jeff Kemble
It appears the 1.4.1 version was deployed with a new maven groupId
For eample, if you are trying to download solr-core, here are the differences
between 1.4.0 and 1.4.1.
1.4.0
groupId: org.apache.solr
artifactId: solr-core
1.4.1
groupId: org.apache.solr.solr
artifactId:solr-core
Was this
The solr docs say it is RESTful, yet it seems that it doesn't use http headers
in a RESTful way. For example, it doesn't seem to use the Accept: request
header to determine the media-type to be returned. Instead, it requires a
query parameter to be used in the URL. Also, it doesn't seem to
I would like to the URLDataSource to make RESTful calls to get content and only
re-index when content changes. This means using http headers to make a request
and using the response headers to determine when to make the request. For
example,
Request Headers:
Accept: application/xml
On Jun 26, 2010, at 5:18pm, Jason Chaffee wrote:
It appears the 1.4.1 version was deployed with a new maven groupId
For eample, if you are trying to download solr-core, here are the
differences between 1.4.0 and 1.4.1.
1.4.0
groupId: org.apache.solr
artifactId: solr-core
1.4.1
groupId:
Hi,
I just started using SolrI am using SolrJ client, but uploading the file
directly to Solr. I think we can use Tika in our code first.
Here I send the file directly to Solr which will do the text extraction:
CommonsHttpSolrServer solr = new
Hello,
Applying the NGramFilterFactory for analyzer type=query didnt solve the
issue.
From the examples I've seen it is only necesssary to have the
NGramFilterFactory at index time right ?
Regards,
Indika
On 27 June 2010 01:14, Indika Tantrigoda indik...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've been
Simple code like this:
File file = new File (test.pdf);
InputStream input = new FileInputStream(file);
Metadata metadata = new Metadata ();
ContentHandler handler = new BodyContentHandler();
AutoDetectParser parse = new AutoDetectParser();
parse.parse(input, handler, metadata);
26 matches
Mail list logo
