Dennis Gearon [gear...@sbcglobal.net] wrote:
how about a timrstamp with either a GUID appended on the end of it?
Since long (8 bytes) is the largest atomic type supported by Java, this would
have to be represented as a String (or rather BytesRef) and would take up 4 +
32 bytes + 2 * 4 bytes
Hi
I'm trying to use HebMorph, a new Hebrew analyzer.
http://github.com/itaifrenkel/HebMorph/tree/master/java/
The instructions says:
1. Download the code from
herehttp://github.com/synhershko/HebMorph/tree/master/java/
.
2. Use the hebmorph ant
Hello Techies,
I am new to Solr, i am using it with mysql.
Suppose i have table called person in mysql with two columns name, age
and i have configured mysql in solr. now i have added a new column to person
table called phoneNumber, is it possible for solr to recognize new column
dynamically ?
You have to change the old configuration for the newly added field.Or you can
use dynamic fields concept.
Go through the link
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SchemaXml
-Original Message-
From: nitin.vanaku...@gmail.com [via Lucene]
ml-node+1826759-1041834398-225...@n3.nabble.com
Sent:
On 11/1/2010 11:14 PM, Ken Stanley wrote:
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Todlistac...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a number of fields I need to do an exact match on. I've defined
them as 'string' in my schema.xml. I've noticed that I get back query
results that don't have all of the words I'm
Hi Sivaprasad,
first of all thanks for your kind response.
i gone through that link,
if i use the dynamicField concept,still i need to alter the query in
data-config.xml right!
thanks
Nitin
--
View this message in context:
Not if you use 'SELECT * FROM person'
Ephraim Ofir
-Original Message-
From: nitin.vanaku...@gmail.com [mailto:nitin.vanaku...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 11:19 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Solr MySQL Adding new column to table
Hi Sivaprasad,
first
Hi,
I have a requirement of dynamically creating new cores(master). Each
core should have a replicated slave core.
I am working with Java and using SolrJ as my solr client. I came
across CoreAdminRequest class and looks like the way to go.
CoreAdminRequest.createCore(NewCore1, NewCore1,
ok. i have one more issue.
i am getting following exception can you please explore on it
INFO: Creating a connection for entity person with URL:
jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/example
Nov 2, 2010 3:34:11 PM org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.JdbcDataSource$1
call
INFO: Time taken for
Your uniqueKey field is defined as id (in schema.xml) and your query
doesn't return an id field.
Ephraim Ofir
-Original Message-
From: nitin.vanaku...@gmail.com [mailto:nitin.vanaku...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 12:10 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Solr
Thank you Bernd! I couldn't make it run though. Here is my problem:
1. There is a file ~/apache-solr-1.4.1/ifaq/lib/stempel-1.0.jar
2. In ~/apache-solr-1.4.1/ifaq/solr/conf/solrconfig.xml there is a
directive: lib path=../lib/stempel-1.0.jar /
3. In ~/apache-solr-1.4.1/ifaq/solr/conf/schema.xml
That's not the response I get when I try your query, so I suspect
something's not quite right with your test...
But you could also try putting parentheses around the words, like
mykeywords:(Compliance+With+Conduct+Standards)
Best
Erick
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 5:25 AM, Tod listac...@gmail.com
Hi all,
This seems a basic question: what's the best way to get
TermVectorComponents. from the Solr XmL response?
SolrJ does not include TermVectorComponents in its api; the SOLR-949 patch
adds this ability, but after 2 years it's still not in the mainline. (And
doesn't patch cleanly to the
Hi,
I am currently benchmarking solr index with different fields to see the
impact on its size/ search speed etc. A feature to find the disk usage per
field of index would be really handy and save me alot of time. Do we have
any updates on this?
Has anyone tried writing custom code for it ?
-
Erick I've put the jar files like that before. I also added the
directive and put the file in instanceDir/lib
What is still a problem is that even the files are loaded:
2010-11-02 13:20:48 org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader replaceClassLoader
INFO: Adding
Hi Jakub,
if you unzip your stempel-1.0.jar do you have the
required directory structure and file in there?
org/getopt/stempel/lucene/StempelFilter.class
Regards,
Bernd
Am 02.11.2010 13:54, schrieb Jakub Godawa:
Erick I've put the jar files like that before. I also added the
directive and put
I will. Thanks Darren
-Moazzam
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 1:15 PM, dar...@ontrenet.com wrote:
Take a look at term proximity and phrase query.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRelevancyCookbook
Hey guys,
I have a solr index where i store information about experts from
various fields. The
This is what stempel-1.0.jar consist of after jar -xf:
jgod...@ubuntu:~/apache-solr-1.4.1/ifaq/lib$ ls -R org/
org/:
egothor getopt
org/egothor:
stemmer
org/egothor/stemmer:
Cell.class Diff.classGener.class MultiTrie2.class
Optimizer2.class Reduce.classRow.class
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.comwrote:
That's not the response I get when I try your query, so I suspect
something's not quite right with your test...
But you could also try putting parentheses around the words, like
So you call org.getopt.solr.analysis.StempelTokenFilterFactory.
In this case I would assume a file StempelTokenFilterFactory.class
in your directory org/getopt/solr/analysis/.
And a class which extends the BaseTokenFilterFactory rigth?
...
public class StempelTokenFilterFactory extends
Sorry, I am not Java programmer at all. I would appreciate more
verbose (or step by step) help.
2010/11/2 Bernd Fehling bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de:
So you call org.getopt.solr.analysis.StempelTokenFilterFactory.
In this case I would assume a file StempelTokenFilterFactory.class
in your
By default, the solrconfig.xml has maxBooleanClauses set to 1024, which in
my opinion should be more than enough clauses in general. Recently, we have
been noticing errors in our Catalina log: SEVERE:
org.apache.lucene.search.BooleanQuery$TooManyClauses: maxClauseCount is set
to 2048. As a
Hey guys,
I have 2 instances of Solr running, one as a master, one as a slave.
Both have dataDir/var/lib/solr/data/dataDir
The master works fine, the slave dies with a huge set of stack traces.
The Solr wiki says that replication must match the dataDir if it's
custom, but how do I actually
This is a log dump, please be aware that this only appears in my log if
I have the following enabled in config.
dataDir/var/lib/solr/data/dataDir
... snip ...
requestHandler name=/replication class=solr.ReplicationHandler
lst name=slave
str
I can't seem to find the right formula for this. I have a need to build a
query where one of the fields should boost the score, but not affect the
query if there isn't a match. For example, if I have documents with
restaurants, name, address, cuisine, description, etc. I want to search on,
say,
I think you'll find the dismax request handler helpful in general, it
supports more flexible query wrangling like that.
With the dismax request handler, I think the bq (boost query) parameter
will do what you need, eg:
bq=city:Chicago^5.0
The ^5.0 is how much boost you want, you can play
On 11/2/2010 9:21 AM, Ken Stanley wrote:
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Erick Ericksonerickerick...@gmail.comwrote:
That's not the response I get when I try your query, so I suspect
something's not quite right with your test...
But you could also try putting parentheses around the words,
Do you want something like (Romantic AND View) OR city:Chicago^10?
Best
Erick
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 10:45 AM, kenf_nc ken.fos...@realestate.com wrote:
I can't seem to find the right formula for this. I have a need to build a
query where one of the fields should boost the score, but not
To create the core, the folder with the confs must already exist and has to
be placed in the proper place (inside the solr home). Once you run the
create core action, this core will we added to solr.xml and dinamically
loaded.
--
View this message in context:
(10/11/02 23:14), Ken Stanley wrote:
I've noticed in the stack trace that this exception occurs when trying to
build the query for the highlighting; I've confirmed this by copying the
params and changing hl=true to hl=false. Unfortunately, when using
debugQuery=on, I do not see any details on
Indeed something doesn't seem right about that, quotes are for phrases,
you are right, and I get confused even thinking about what happens when
you try to escape spaces like that.
I think there's something odd going on with your URI-escaping in
general. Here's what the string should actually
Jonathan, Dismax is something I've been meaning to look into, and bq does
seem to fit the bill, although I'm worried about this line in the wiki
:TODO: That latter part is deprecated behavior but still works. It can be
problematic so avoid it.
It still seems to be the closest to what I want
Don't worry about that line. It just means that one particular kind of
'default' behavior in bq shouldn't be relied upon, if you don't entirely
understand that behavior they're saying is deprecated (as I don't
either!) anyway, don't worry about it, just supply an explicit boost in
your bq.
Hmm, i'm not sure it's the highlighter alone. Depending on the query it can
also get triggered by the spellcheck component. See below what happens with a
maxBoolean = 16.
HTTP ERROR: 500
maxClauseCount is set to 16
org.apache.lucene.search.BooleanQuery$TooManyClauses: maxClauseCount is set to
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Koji Sekiguchi k...@r.email.ne.jp wrote:
(10/11/02 23:14), Ken Stanley wrote:
I've noticed in the stack trace that this exception occurs when trying to
build the query for the highlighting; I've confirmed this by copying the
params and changing hl=true to
Hi,
[...] I tried to use IndexableBinaryStringTools to re-encode my 11 byte
array. The size was increased to 7 characters (= 14 bytes)
which is still a gain of more than 50 percent compared to the UTF8
encoding. BTW: I found no sample how to use the
IndexableBinaryStringTools class
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 05:42:51PM -0700, Lance Norskog said:
You should query against the indexer. I'm impressed that you got 5s
replication to work reliably.
That's our current solution - I was just wondering if there was anything
I was missing.
Thanks!
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Simon Wistow si...@thegestalt.org wrote:
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 05:42:51PM -0700, Lance Norskog said:
You should query against the indexer. I'm impressed that you got 5s
replication to work reliably.
That's our current solution - I was just wondering if there
It's definitely a known 'issue' that you can't replicate (or do any
other kind of index change, including a commit) at a faster frequency
than your warming queries take to complete, or you'll wind up with
something like you've seen.
It's in some documentation somewhere I saw, for sure.
The
I have a city field. Now when a user starts typing in a city textbox I want
to return found matches (like Google).
So for example, user types new, and I will return new york, new
hampshire etc.
my schema.xml
field name=city type=string indexed=true stored=true/
my current url:
We used the filters talked about at Lucid Imagination for our site, it
seems to work pretty well:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/09/08/auto-suggest-from-popular-queries-using-edgengrams/
Your mileage might vary, but its a pretty good place to start.
Matt
On 11/2/2010 1:56 PM,
I'm storing a set of products in solr as ducuments. I'm separating out the
name, description, keywords, and product category name into separate fields
so that I can boost them independently using the dismax handler. All the
fields are stored as text in the same way.
I'm passing these four fields
I... Need... more... coffee.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 11:31 AM, kenf_nc ken.fos...@realestate.com wrote:
Jonathan, Dismax is something I've been meaning to look into, and bq does
seem to fit the bill, although I'm worried about this line in the wiki
:TODO: That latter part is deprecated
Also, you might want to consider TermsComponent, see:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/TermsComponent
Also, note that there's an autosuggestcomponent, that's recently been
committed.
Best
Erick
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 1:56 PM, PeterKerk vettepa...@hotmail.com wrote:
I have a city field. Now when
First, you should show us the query, as well as the debug output, it
often helps to have a second set of eyes...
Where are you specifying the qf? Under any circumstance it would
be helpful to see the definition of the request handler you're using.
Because as it stands, the best I can say is that
Hello everyone!
I would like to ask you a question about DIH and delta import.
I am trying to sync Solr with a PostgreSQL database and I have a field
ent_lastModified of type timestamp without timezone.
Here is my xml file:
dataConfig
dataSource name=jdbc driver=org.postgresql.Driver
Thanks for the great info! I appreciate everybody's help in getting started
with Solr, hopefully I'll be able to get my stuff working and move on to more
difficult questions. :)
-Original Message-
From: Elizabeth L. Murnane [mailto:emurn...@architexa.com]
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010
Erick, that query would return all restaurants in Chicago,
whether they
matched Romantic View or not. Although the scores should
sort relevant
results to the top, the results would still contain a lot
of things I wasn't
interested in.
How about this one?
+(city:Chicago^1000 OR (*:*
Ok, here is the query cleaned up a bit:
solr/select/?q=mattress
q.op=AND
IMO, the very, very best way to increase your grasp of all things Solr is
to
try to answer questions on this list. Folks are pretty gentle about
correcting
mistaken posts. And I certainly remember any advice I've given that's been
corrected G.
Besides, if you try to answer the things you *do*
Thanks Mike for your suggestion. It did take me down the correct route. I
basically created another multiValue field of type 'string' and boosted
that. To get the partial matches to avoid the length normalisation I had the
'text' type multiValue field to omitNorms. The results look as per expected
My impression was that
city:Chicago^10 +Romantic +View
would do what you want (with the standard lucene query parser and
default operator OR), and I'm not sure about this, but I have a feeling
that the version with Boolean operators AND/OR and parens might
actually net out to the same thing,
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
mods:mods xmlns:mods=http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3;
xmlns:xlink=http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink;
xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
xsi:schemaLocation=http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3
http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-0.xsd;
memory's cheap! (I know processing it is not' though )
Dennis Gearon
Signature Warning
It is always a good idea to learn from your own mistakes. It is usually a
better
idea to learn from others’ mistakes, so you do not have to make them yourself.
from
I don't know the paths in the Solr package for Ubuntu. In the Solr
apache release, you go to the example/ directory. The example/solr
directory needs a new lib directory, and you copy the jars to there.
Then run 'java -jar start.jar' still in the example/ directory.
Solr should start. Now, you
TVC is in Solr 1.4 onwards. It is configured in
example/solr/conf/solrconfig.xml as 'tvrh'.
This is not a solr/url thing, so you have to say
solr/select?q=word'qt=tvrh' and look at the bottom of the xml.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 5:34 AM, Will Milspec will.mils...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
This
The Lucene CheckIndex program opens an index and reads many types of
data from it. It's easy to start with it and change that to count up
the space used by terms and store data for field X.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 5:51 AM, Muneeb Ali muneeba...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am currently
Here's the problem: Solr is a little dumb about these Filter classes,
and so you have to make a Factory object for the Stempel Filter.
There are a lot of other FilterFactory classes. You would have to just
copy one and change the names to Stempel and it might actually work.
This will take some
Isn't that what this code does?
onDeckSearchers++;
if (onDeckSearchers 1) {
// should never happen... just a sanity check
log.error(logid+ERROR!!! onDeckSearchers is + onDeckSearchers);
onDeckSearchers=1; // reset
} else if (onDeckSearchers
And the SpellingComponent.
There's nothing to help you with phrases.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, you might want to consider TermsComponent, see:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/TermsComponent
Also, note that there's an
The XPathEP has the option to run a real XSL script at some point in
its processing chain. I guess you could make an XSL that pulls your
fields out into a simpler XML in the /a/b/c format that the XPath
parser supports.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 5:37 PM, pghorp...@ucla.edu wrote:
?xml
61 matches
Mail list logo
