Thanx Tommaso
now solr starts OK.
but what really I don't comprehend is how my text get annotated by UIMA
because when I started indexing none of the "UIMA" new fields get data
If you please point me to some kind of articles that explain how this thing
works...
(11/01/31 3:11), Em wrote:
Hello list,
I build an application that uses SolrJ to communicate with Solr.
What did I do?
Well, I deleted all the solrj-lib stuff from my application's
Webcontent-directory and inserted the solrj-lib from the freshly compiled
solr 4.0 - trunk.
However, when trying
Hi,
FYI:
I figured out a solution my self. I wanted a smart way to get the shard
count for a query (how many documents were found in each shard). The "smart"
consisted in having all these counts in just one query using faceting. I was
asking if Solr could help with this, e.g. had some smart info
Brilliant. So obvious.
Upayavira
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 18:53 -0700, "Bob Sandiford"
wrote:
> Or - you could add a standard field to each shard, populate with a
> distinct value for each shard, and facet on that field. Then look at the
> facet counts of the value that corresponds to a shard, and,
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:54 AM, Dennis Gearon wrote:
> So, is it normal for the first search against a freshly made index to return
> nothing?
[...]
No.
Did you do a commit after the indexing? If I understand
your implications correctly, it does not make sense that
search #2 works when search
So, is it normal for the first search against a freshly made index to return
nothing?
Dennis Gearon
Signature Warning
It is always a good idea to learn from your own mistakes. It is usually a
better
idea to learn from others’ mistakes, so you do not have to make them yoursel
Hi Mark,
"When I indexed *George *it was also finally analyzed and stored as *george*
Theny why is it that I don't get a match as per the analysis report I had"
your indexed term is george but you search for George* which does not go
through the same analysis process as it did when it was indexed
Hello list,
I build an application that uses SolrJ to communicate with Solr.
What did I do?
Well, I deleted all the solrj-lib stuff from my application's
Webcontent-directory and inserted the solrj-lib from the freshly compiled
solr 4.0 - trunk.
However, when trying to query Solr 4.0 it shows m
Hi Ahmet,
Thanks for the reply.
I had attached the Analysis report of the query George*
It is found to be split into terms *George** and *George* by the
WordDelimiterFilterFactory and the LowerCaseFilterFactory converts it to *
george** and *george*
When I indexed *George *it was also finally a
Hello Ravi Kiran,
I am not quite sure if it has anything to do with the number of records.
Anyways there are around 400K docs in Solr, and my deleteByQuery() tries to
delete about 400 docs..
The thing is, it does seem to delete the records, but the control never
seems to come back to the caller.
I found the issue is in the README.txt as the right class to use is
UIMAUpdateRequestProcessorFactory, please change that in your solrconfig.
Regards,
Tommaso
2011/1/30 Darx Oman
> Hi
> I already copied "apache-solr-uima-4.0-SNAPSHOT.jar"tosolr\lib
> but what causing the error is this
>
:When i try george* I get results. Whereas George* fetches no results.
Wildcard queries are not analyzed by QueryParser.
12 matches
Mail list logo