Hi,
yes we do.
If you use a limit number of categories (like 100) you can use dynamic fields
with the termscomponent and by choosing a category specific prefix, like:
{schema.xml}
...
dynamicField name=*_suggestion type=textAS indexed=true stored=false
multiValued=true omitNorms=true/
...
Ok, thanks a lot.
After making a few tests, I finally understood what you meant.
Best regards,
Elisabeth
2011/5/2 Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu
So if you have a field that IS tokenized, regardless of what it's called,
then when you send My Great Restaurant to it for _indexing_, it gets
Peter,
is there a specific need to split these entities? why not just fetch
both columns in one entity? like this:
entity name=artist_category query=select categoryid from
artist_categories where objectid=${artist.id}
entity name=category query=select title_en, title_nl from
Dear list,
In SOLR schema on the index side we use no stemming to support favor
wildcard search. On the query side of the index we use Porter stemming.
I have noticed the following issue: the term pretty gets stemmed to
pretti and thus not found.
What would be the approach to handle such
Hi,
I think you have to use stemming on both side (index and query) if you
really want to use stemming.
Ludovic
2011/5/3 Dmitry Kan [via Lucene]
ml-node+2893599-894006307-383...@n3.nabble.com
Dear list,
In SOLR schema on the index side we use no stemming to support favor
wildcard search.
Hi Ludovic,
That's an option we had before we decided to go for a full-blown support of
wildcards.
Do you know of a way to keep both stemming and consistent wildcard support
in the same field?`
Dmitry
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:56 PM, lboutros boutr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I think you have
Dmitry,
I don't know any way to keep both stemming and consistent wildcard support
in the same field.
To me, you have to create 2 different fields.
Ludovic.
2011/5/3 Dmitry Kan [via Lucene]
ml-node+2893628-993677979-383...@n3.nabble.com
Hi Ludovic,
That's an option we had before we decided
Hello,
I'm also in favor of maintaing a web interface that ships with nutch. As has
been mentioned it say well be a bridge to Solr. If I find the time to
contribute my solution (and make it general enough), I'll happily do it.
Earlier I was wondering of actually using the previous nutch web
Yes, Ludovic. Thus effectively we get index doubled. Given the volume of
data we store, we very carefully consider such cases, where the doubling of
index is must.
Dmitry
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 1:08 PM, lboutros boutr...@gmail.com wrote:
Dmitry,
I don't know any way to keep both stemming and
I'm not sure you can. very short fields aren't differentiated on the basis
of field length due to rounding errors. Here's a cut-n-paste from Jay Hill:
So the values are not pre-set for the lengthNorm, but for some counts the
fieldLength value winds up being the
No, but i think the difference between fieldlength is large and the score is
still the same.
Same score for this results(q=chelsea):
1. Chelsea is a very very big club in london, england Chelsea
Sport
2. Chelsea
Dear list,
we use solr 3.1.0.
my logs have the following entry:
May 3, 2011 2:01:39 PM org.apache.solr.request.UnInvertedField uninvert
INFO: UnInverted multi-valued field
for category:chelsea, you have a fieldNorm=1.0, so your category field must
have a type with omitNorms=true. if you don't have omitNorms=true, then
shorter field will score higher.
I'm new to Solr, but from what I've experienced, this is the cause.
Regards,
Elisabeth
2011/5/3 roySolr
Hi
I am running one instance with multiple core. If call full-import URI
simultanesously for multiple core few of the fields are not getting
indexed.If i do full-import one by one.Its works fine. Thanks in advance
--
View this message in context:
Hello Friends,
I am new to Solr and experiencing issue while trying to use
DataImportHandler. I added the required fields to schema.xml file and here
is my data-config.xml file :
dataConfig
dataSource driver=com.mysql.jdbc.Driver
url=jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/mp3
user=root
Serenity,
there is no field fileNo in your SELECT-Query? you've defined it in
the pk-Attribut of the entity Tag, but it's also required in the
Query itself. just to note it: you can skip your field definition,
if the query returns the field with exactly the same name as the
solr-schema requires
Dear Stefan,
Am still getting the following error message even after including the
pk-Attribute to the query :
WARNING: Error creating document :
SolrInputDocument[{lname=lname(1.0)={cindy}, file=file(1.0)={
http://localhost:8084/Access/UploadFiles/laura.mp3},
fname=fname(1.0)={troutman}}]
Do you log files show any errors?
Erick
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Kannan ramkannan2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I am running one instance with multiple core. If call full-import URI
simultanesously for multiple core few of the fields are not getting
indexed.If i do full-import one by
Hi, I would like to get another's field information for the same document
within a Tekonizer class.
How can this be achieved?
Thanks
The next thing to check is if your select statement returns the
fileNo for every field.
Wait.. You took out the field column=fileNo name=id bit of your entity
definition, is that a cut/paste error?
You might get some joy from the DIH debug page at:
solr homesolr/admin/dataimport.jsp
it's not
Dear Erick,
I am using Solr 1.4 version. Yes, for each row , we will get one fileNo
which is the primary key for the table file.
No, I intentionally removed the field column=fileNo name=id from the
data-config.xml
I tried opening the dataimport.jsp to debug but I don't know, it doesn't
show any
I' m using Solr 3.1 right now.
I was looking at a threadump trying to figure out why queries were not
exactly fast and noticed that it keeps parsing xml over and over from
the schema to get the lucene version.
SolrQueryParser are created for each request and in the constructor
there is a call
I'm new to Solr and trying to get it call a UIMA aggregate analysis
engine and not having much luck.
The null pointer exception indicates that it can't find the xml file
associated with the engine.
I have tried a number of combinations of a path in the analysisEngine
element, but nothing
seems
UnInvertedField is similar to Lucene's FieldCache, except, while the
FieldCache cannot work with multivalued fields, UnInvertedField is designed
for that very purpose. So since your f_dcperson field is multivalued, by
default you use UnInvertedField. You're not doing anything wrong, that's
default
From what I have seen, adding a second field with the same terms as the first
does *not* double your index size at all.
-Original Message-
From: Dmitry Kan [mailto:dmitry@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 4:06 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: stemming for English
Hi FMC,
On 5/3/2011 at 12:37 PM, FatMan Corp wrote:
Hi, I would like to get another's field information for the same document
within a Tekonizer class.
How can this be achieved?
Use copyFields in your schema
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SchemaXml#Copy_Fields, and associate different
analysis
OK, put it back G
According to this page:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#Configuration_in_data-config.xml-1
the pk is used for delta imports and has no relation to uniqueKey
defined in the schema.xml
The error you're getting is because your schema.xml defines the id
field
I tried it. It just does not work. the debug component only works when
query component is there, and it is just showing debugging information for
query result, not term match result.
--
View this message in context:
Saying it does not work doesn't give us much to go on. Can you describe
what you've tried? *How* it fails? Have you looked in the log for any clues?
You might review this page:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists
Best
Erick
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 3:35 PM, cyang2010
Hi,
I have a use case where i need to know for a paritcular multivalue field,
which particular value match when a query is run on that field. For
example, for a movie document, movie title name is single-value field,
movie actors is multi-value field. When user search colin, i know it is
colin
Sorry i didn't mean to give random reply. It is just today my solr
configuration/schema is different now and can't get the error message.
Anyway, i rerun the test.
Basically by specifying such searchcomponent and requesthandler, you won't
get any error.
When you query this it is fine without
Hello all,
I've been trying to add the Spatial Search Plugin to my Solr 1.4.1 setup,
and I get this error:
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/solr/search/QParserPlugin
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:634)
at
Where did you store the jar? Is it in a directory Solr looks for libs?
Depending on your distro or set up there can be different places to store the
jar. The easiest solution is to put it in a dir where other Solr libs are
found or in a dir that you configured in a lib directive in solrconfig.
Oh, I apparently figured out how to get the jar file to load, so problem is
solved I suppose.
The fix seems very odd to me, but I got it from a comment on the SSP 2 blog
page (
http://blog.jteam.nl/2009/08/03/geo-location-search-with-solr-and-lucene/comment-page-1/#comment-4774
):
The solution,
--- On Tue, 5/3/11, Charton, Andre achar...@ebay-kleinanzeigen.de wrote:
yes we do.
If you use a limit number of categories (like 100) you can
use dynamic fields with the termscomponent and by choosing a
category specific prefix, like:
{schema.xml}
...
dynamicField name=*_suggestion
Thanks Andy!
Solr-RA is the same as Solr, except that the underlying search library
is now RankingAlgorithm library instead of Lucene. BoostQParserPlugin
works at the Solr level, so this should still work as before.
A query of the form q={!boost b=log(x)}abcde comes back with results but am
I went ahead and patched locally the SolrQueryParser in current 3_x branch.
Doing a quick test, baring any obvious mistake due to sleep
deprivation I get close to a 10X performance boost from 200qps to
2000qps.
I opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2493
cheers,
-- stephane
On
how we can configure query server in solr using replication feature?
Thanks,
Gaurav
Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 22:05:33 -0700
Subject: Re: How to take differential backup of Solr Index
From: goks...@gmail.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
The Replication feature does this. If you configure
So it turns out that it's the host names. According the DNS RFC
underscores are not valid in host names. Most DNS servers now support
them, but it's not in the rfc strictly speaking. So there must be
something in the underlying java classes that bork when using
underscores in host names,
Hi ,
My schema consists of a field of type lowercase(for applying the lowercase
filter factory) and is the unique key . But its no longer behaving as
unique key. Multiple documents with same value for the unique key are
getting indexed.
Does anyone know why this is happening or is it that the
Hi All,
We use Solr 1.4.1. Single core setup with a repeater (for QA) and a few
slaves (for Production).
Master will index many sources and make data ready. Once all data is
ready-for-production, optimization will take place. On master
replicateAfter is set to optimize. (Subsequently on repeater
41 matches
Mail list logo
