Hi,
I am using Solr 3.3 and have run into a problem with grouping. If 'group.main'
is 'true' and 'start' is greater than 'rows', then I do not get any results. A
sample response is:
response
lst name=responseHeaderint name=status0/intint
name=QTime602/int/lstlst name=grouped/result
Yes, I do have an '/update/javabin' request handler in SolrConfig.
But, should I remove that?
I tried putting the UIMA update chain inside /update/javabin instead of
/update request handler..
requestHandler name=/update/javabin
class=solr.BinaryUpdateRequestHandler
lst
Hi all,
Are there some kind of average indexing times or PDF's in relation to
its size?
I have here a 10MB PDF (50 pages) which takes about 30 seconds to index!
Is that normal?
Depends on you hardware. PDF parsing is a lot more tedious than XML and
besides parsing it's also analyzed and
Thanks for your answer, but your answer is a little bit useless for
me. Could you please add more information in addition to this link?
Do I have to create a root core to create other cores?
How can I create a root core? Manually adding in the solr.xml config?
2011/7/11 Gabriele Kahlout
if you need the core just for testing then use Solr test framework as in the
link.
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Mark Schoy hei...@gmx.de wrote:
Thanks for your answer, but your answer is a little bit useless for
me. Could you please add more information in addition to this link?
Do I
I will be out of the office starting 12/07/2011 and will not return until
14/07/2011.
Please email to itsta...@actionimages.com for any urgent issues.
Action Images is a division of Reuters Limited and your data will therefore be
protected
in accordance with the Reuters Group Privacy / Data
Am 12.07.2011 10:08, schrieb alexander sulz:
Hi all,
Are there some kind of average indexing times or PDF's in relation to
its size?
I have here a 10MB PDF (50 pages) which takes about 30 seconds to
index!
Is that normal?
Depends on you hardware. PDF parsing is a lot more tedious than XML
Hi,
In the case where two or more documents are returned with the same score, is
there a way to tell Solr to sort them alphabetically?
I have already tried to use the tie-breaker, but I have just one field to
search.
Thank you.
--
View this message in context:
Am 12.07.2011 12:03, schrieb alexander sulz:
Still, why the PHP stops working correctly is beyond me, but it seems to
be fixed now.
You should mind the max_execution_time parameter in you php.ini.
Greetings,
Kuli
Am 12.07.2011 12:13, schrieb Lox:
Hi,
In the case where two or more documents are returned with the same score, is
there a way to tell Solr to sort them alphabetically?
Yes, add the parameter
sort=score desc,your_field_that_shall_be_sorted_alphabetically asc
to your request.
Greetings,
You just need to provide a second sort field along the lines of:
sort=score desc, author desc
François
On Jul 12, 2011, at 6:13 AM, Lox wrote:
Hi,
In the case where two or more documents are returned with the same score, is
there a way to tell Solr to sort them alphabetically?
Hi
Our team plans to use SolR for our searchs (we currently use Lucene
directly, but some new business requirements such as near real time index
updates seems to be easier to handle with solr).
Our application runs with 2 data centers in active / active mode.
Read operations in the index are
Hmm, I'm bit confused. Do you really use SolrJ ?
If so:
If I put it inside /update, the following is the stacktrace:
request:
http://localhost:8080/apache-solr-3.3.0/update/javabin?wt=javabinversion=2
org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Bad Request
what did you mean by it and why did you
Hi Koji
Yes, I do use SolrJ.
I began recompiling the whole thing... since I thought the problem is the
UIMA snapshot.
Previously, I compiled files from eclipse and it worked fine.
(Now I realize that eclipse compiled it because I added my jar files to its
build path)
I am now getting build
Hi!
I am going to propose a concept where pretty long and complex filter
query (fq) parameters can occur. They are used to enforce permissions
so that a user sees only those documents which he has permissions for.
1. I assume that it's worthwhile to rely on POST method instead of GET
when
I am going to propose a concept where pretty long and
complex filter
query (fq) parameters can occur. They are used to enforce
permissions
so that a user sees only those documents which he has
permissions for.
1. I assume that it's worthwhile to rely on POST method
instead of GET
when
I'm having an issue with a delta import.
I have the following in my data-config.xml:
document name=ads
entity name=ad
query=select * from ads WHERE approvedate gt; '1/1/1900' and
publishdate
lt; getdate() AND depublishdate gt; getdate() and deletedate = '1/1/1900'
Hi
I've fixed the missing license issues by attaching a license.txt file to my
jar files.
Everything gets built now, with a single error.
/Users/svajjala/Downloads/apache-solr-3.3.0/solr/contrib/uima/src/main/java/org/apache/solr/uima/processor/UIMAToSolrMapper.java:62:
type
How to restart Solar ? I am using Solr with the windchill 10.
I don't know windchill 10, but if you run Solr on Jetty or Tomcat,
CTRL+C to shutdown then start Solr again. Or if you use CoreAdmin,
RELOAD action might help:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin#RELOAD
koji
--
Thanks for the reply!
I got a followup question: Can I customize Tomcat logging so that the
fq value is not logged?
Marian
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 15:34, Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com wrote:
...
Yes it accepts both GET and POST.
Bit of a delayed answer, but your suggestion worked, so thank you! :)
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Call-indexer-after-action-on-website-tp3105153p3162743.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Peter,
Try adding the primary key attribute to the root entity 'ad' and check if
delta import works.
By the way, which database are you using ?
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:27 AM, PeterKerk vettepa...@hotmail.com wrote:
I'm having an issue with a delta import.
I have the following in my
Hello,
I'm trying to get the norm of an indexed document for a given field but
beside reader.norms(fieldName) I'm not finding any API to retrieve it. Now
reader.norms(..) returns an array with the norms for that field of all
indexed documents. How do I know the index of my document in there?
Hi Rahul,
Not sure how I would do this Try adding the primary key attribute to the
root entity 'ad'?
In my entity ad I already have these fields (I left those out earlier for
readability):
field name=id column=ID / -- this is primary key of ads table
field name=userid column=userid /
field
entity *pk=id* name=ad .
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:34 AM, PeterKerk vettepa...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi Rahul,
Not sure how I would do this Try adding the primary key attribute to the
root entity 'ad'?
In my entity ad I already have these fields (I left those out
That did the trick! Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Delta-import-issue-tp3162581p3163009.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
hi all,
building lucene/solr behind the firewall fails for us due to proxy errors.
I tried setting the ant_opts -Dhttp.proxyHost, etc, but found the lucene
portion still failed on javadoc links.
I worked round this by changing failonjavadocerror to 'false' in
lucene/common-build.xml (or
Hi Folks,
I need to filter out the returns if the document's field activated = false.
I tried the following in order to retrieve similar products which are
all activated products. But this does not work.
http://localhost:8983/solr/mlt?q=(id:2043144 AND activated:true)mlt.count=10
Can you
(11/07/13 1:40), Elaine Li wrote:
Hi Folks,
I need to filter out the returns if the document's field activated = false.
I tried the following in order to retrieve similar products which are
all activated products. But this does not work.
http://localhost:8983/solr/mlt?q=(id:2043144 AND
Total Linux noob, 1 month into first server ever...
CentOS 5.6 Final
Loaded php52 from ius
yum install of mysql
tomcat
I've got Nutch up and running and working (may need to work on filters at
some point) and I have Solr up and running and indexing everything. But,
then I came to the point of
Thanks for the link. Using the fq with MLT request handler works.
Elaine
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Koji Sekiguchi k...@r.email.ne.jp wrote:
(11/07/13 1:40), Elaine Li wrote:
Hi Folks,
I need to filter out the returns if the document's field activated =
false.
I tried the
I want to show the new avatar of an ad as soon as the thumbid value of that
ad is updated.
This is what I had before delta query which works all fine:
document name=ads
entity pk=id name=ad
query=select * from ads WHERE approvedate gt; '1/1/1900' and
publishdate
lt;
: Taking a closer look at this it seems as if the
: DisjunctionMaxQueryParser supports doing multiple aliases and
: generating multiple queries, I didn't see this same capability in the
: ExtendedDismaxQParser, am I just missing it? If this capability were
it's never been exposed at a user level
I'm getting this error testing Solr V3.3.0 using the
ExtractingRequestHandler. I'm taking advantage of the REST interface
and batching my documents in using stream.url. It happens for every
document I try to index. It works fine under Solr 1.4.1.
I'm running everything under Tomcat. I
Hi Torsten,
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Torsten Kunze torsten.ku...@b-s-s.dewrote:
Hi,
as a feasibility study I am trying to run Solr with multiple thousands of
cores in the same shard to have small indexes that can be created and
removed very fast.
Now, I have a Tomcat running with
Hey all - just a friendly FYI reminder:
CALL FOR PARTICIPATION CLOSES FRIDAY, JULY 15!
TO SUBMIT A TOPIC, GO TO: http://2011.lucene-eurocon.org/pages/cfp
Now in its second year, Apache Lucene Eurocon 2011 comes to Barcelona, Spain,
providing an unparalleled opportunity for European search
Thanks Hoss. I'm not really sure where to begin looking with this, I
quickly read the JIRA but don't see mention of exposing the multiple
aliases. Can you provide any more details?
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: Taking a closer look at this
hello,
was wondering if there is a solr/velocity function out there that can sort
say, a title name, by clicking on a link named sort title that can sort
ascending or descending by alpha? or is this a frontend/jquery type of
thing?
thanks
--
View this message in context:
: Thanks Hoss. I'm not really sure where to begin looking with this, I
: quickly read the JIRA but don't see mention of exposing the multiple
: aliases. Can you provide any more details?
i refered to it as uf or user fields ... note the specific comment i
linked to in the first url, and the
Hi mate,
I'm a php Dev. Try zend server community edition from zend. Install is easy and
comes with most things u need and may solve this for you. Centos is always a
bit behind for stability reasons. Zs also has lots of other goodies.
Personally I use a php library rather than a php extension
Hi Nikhil,
Thanks for raising this issue. I checked this particular issue in a test
case and I ran into the same error, so this is indeed a bug. I've fixed this
issue for 3x in revision 1145748.
So checking out the latest 3x branch and building Solr yourself should give
you this bug fix. Or you
I'm not following where the aliasing feature I'm looking for is.
Looking at the patch I didn't see it either. Essentially what I'm
looking for is when a user searches for person_name that the query
turns into person_name:john OR person_name_first:john OR
person_name_last:john. I don't see
Unless you stored your content field, the value you put in there won't
be fetched from the index. Verify that the doc you retrieve from the index
has values for content, I bet it doesn't
Best
Erick
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Gabriele Kahlout
gabri...@mysimpatico.com wrote:
@Test
What target did you try to build? Did you try ant dist?
Best
Erick
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Will Milspec will.mils...@gmail.com wrote:
hi all,
building lucene/solr behind the firewall fails for us due to proxy errors.
I tried setting the ant_opts -Dhttp.proxyHost, etc, but found
This is a shot in the dark, but this smells like a classpath issue,
and since you have
a 1.4.1 installation on the machine, I'm *guessing* that you're getting a mix of
old and new Jars. What happens if you try this on a machine that doesn't have
1.4.1 on it? If that works, then it's likely a
Velocity should have nothing to do with it, you specify on the query
something like sort=title asc or sort=title desc. But do note that
sorting only really makes sense when the field is NOT tokenized. Often
using a combination of a Keyword tokenizer and LowerCaseFilter gives
the results you're
I'm messing around with the field collapsing in 4.x
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldCollapsing . Is it currently possible to
group by a field with a certain value only and leave all the others
ungrouped using the group.query param? This currently doesn't seem to work
the way I want it to.
For
nothing was changed... the result is still the same... shuold i implement my
own analyzer or tokenizer for the problem?
-
Zeki ama calismiyor... Calissa yapar...
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/invisible-words-tp3158060p3164670.html
Sent from the Solr -
Thanks Martijn - I should be able to patch the Solr 3.3 release based on
r1145748.
- Nikhil
From: Martijn v Groningen
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Nikhil Chhaochharia
Sent: Wednesday, 13 July 2011 2:04 AM
Subject: Re: Possible bug in Solr 3.3 grouping
Hi
I'm running 64bit Ubuntu 11.04, nutch 1.2, solr 3.3 (downloaded, not
built) and tomcat6 following this (and some other) links
http://wiki.apache.org/nutch/RunningNutchAndSolr
I have added the nutch schema and can access/view this schema via the
admin page. nutch also works as I can perfrom
50 matches
Mail list logo
