Hi if you have not figyured it out as yet, this might help::
Issues with *schema.xml*
field name=textSpell type=text stored=false indexed=true
multiValued=true /
here the type should actually be textSpell (fieldType that you have defined
earlier)
Also I would suggest that you use a seperate
If you have meta-data available on what all is actually searched on your
site, you can use mahout to get keywords, and then define your solr
accordingly.
THis might help:
https://cwiki.apache.org/MAHOUT/collocations.html
Alternatively, you can parse your query (either at client end or server
I already tried with field type = textSpell but it didn't work, I replaced it
though.
I found this code :
requestHandler name=/spellCheckCompRH class=solr.SearchHandler
lst name=defaults
!-- Optional, must match spell checker's name as defined above, defaults to
default --
str
I already tried with field type = textSpell but it didn't work, I replaced it
though.
I found this code :
requestHandler name=/spellCheckCompRH class=solr.SearchHandler
lst name=defaults
!-- Optional, must match spell checker's name as defined above, defaults to
default --
str
Hi,
I am running solr in tomcat on a linux machine, my solr hangs after about 40
hrs, I wanted to generate the dump and analyse the logs. But the command
kill -QUIT PID doesn't seem to be doing anything.
How can I generate a dump otherwise to see, why solr hangs?
Regards,
Rohit
what about kill -3 PID command?
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Rohit ro...@in-rev.com wrote:
Hi,
I am running solr in tomcat on a linux machine, my solr hangs after about 40
hrs, I wanted to generate the dump and analyse the logs. But the command
kill -QUIT PID doesn't seem to be doing
Nope not getting anything here also.
Regards,
Rohit
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Li [mailto:zongjie...@gmail.com]
Sent: 08 September 2011 08:09
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Unable to generate trace
what about kill -3 PID command?
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Rohit
No, as far as I know sorting by group count isn't planned. You can create an
issue in Jira where future development of this feature can be tracked.
On 7 September 2011 23:54, bobsolr xbvbvccvb...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi Martijn,
Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately I can't reference the group
How about using jmap or jvisualvm?
Or even connecting with eclipse to the process for live analysis?
Am 08.09.2011 11:07, schrieb Rohit:
Nope not getting anything here also.
Regards,
Rohit
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Li [mailto:zongjie...@gmail.com]
Sent: 08 September 2011 08:09
In the RequestHandler spellCheckCompRH you have to make changes as follows:
requestHandler name=/spellCheckCompRH class=solr.SearchHandler
lst name=spellcheck
str name=echoParamsexplicit/str
str name=spellcheck.dictionarytextSpell/str
str
Hello,
I have a query
/select?q=49q.alt=*:*fq=NAME_ANALYZED:decorasol AND WAY_ANALYZED:rue
charonne AND (TOWN_ANALYZED:paris OR
DEPARTMENT_ANALYZED:paris)rows=50fl=*,score
returning no answer because of the q=49 parameter.
The query
/select?q=q.alt=*:*fq=NAME_ANALYZED:decorasol AND
Glad you resolved it. I've spent more time than I'd like to admit
trying to get an IDE to play nice!
Erick
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Sowmya V.B. vbsow...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Erick
It was indeed an eclipse issue! Thanks for saying that.
I cleaned the project, restarted eclipse and built
First, this is a very sparse problem statement, please review:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists
But my guess is that you perhaps changed your schema
and didn't re-index completely. Use admin/schema browser
to look at the field and see whether the values in the
field are what you
ok, I guess I found how
q=49 OR *
2011/9/8 elisabeth benoit elisaelisael...@gmail.com
Hello,
I have a query
/select?q=49q.alt=*:*fq=NAME_ANALYZED:decorasol AND WAY_ANALYZED:rue
charonne AND (TOWN_ANALYZED:paris OR
DEPARTMENT_ANALYZED:paris)rows=50fl=*,score
returning no answer because
Wildcard terms are not analyzed, so your synonyms.txt may come into play here,
have you check the analysis for deniz* ?
François
On Sep 7, 2011, at 10:08 PM, deniz wrote:
well yea you are right... i realised that lack of detail issue here... so
here it comes...
This is from my
Hi,
I have a problem with solr search. If I search after vitamin I receive :
1 - arrca MULTIVITAMIN FRUCHTSAFTBÄRCHEN
2 - VITAMIN E-KAPSELN NAT. 400
How can I configure the fieldtype or the query to get the documents by
position of the word in documents found?(VITAMIN E-KAPSELN NAT. 400 before
You can try this: q=key:value1^8 key=value2^4 key=value3^2.
It should be working.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-write-this-query-tp3318577p3319491.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Following up from your message on the Nutch list. If q=*:* is showing you
empty doc/doc elements,
no fields are getting indexed.
I don't think that is correct. I believe that the correct statement would be
no fields are getting *** stored ***. If the fields were not getting indexed,
they
Hi,
I'm working on implementing Solr in a project and right now I'm stuck on a
specific search including an arr field. The thing is:
I'd like to search sub-id's on an object, these sub-id's are stored in a
multivalue field, e.g.:
arr name=SubIds
int12272/int
int12304/int
int12306/int
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 6:57 PM, kiran.bodigam kiran.bodi...@gmail.com wrote:
SOLR will keep the indexed information in directory called
index(${DATA_DIR}/index) after clicking the commit from admin console and
also we can override the existing index files. similarly can we keep (or)
store
If you think about it, Lucene (upon which Solr is build) *is* a kind of DBMS -
just not an RDBMS. After all, in the end, a DBMS stores its stuff in files,
too. If you then turned around and mapped the stuff that Solr does into
database tables, you would lose all of the performance advantages
Hi ,
I am using separate task to monitor solr instances, where do i find xsd
schemas for MultiCore Solr responses inorder to correctly parse them.
thanks,
Ani
eg. XML
response lst name=responseHeaderint name=status0/intint name=
QTime16/int/lstlst name=statuslst name=core0str name=name
Lucene isn't even close to a DBMS. The batch commits make it less of of
database than Berkeley DB.
Lucene is a search engine.
wunder
On Sep 8, 2011, at 8:54 AM, Jaeger, Jay - DOT wrote:
If you think about it, Lucene (upon which Solr is build) *is* a kind of DBMS
- just not an RDBMS. After
Hi,
I am working on a plugin for Solr, and in this project, a
QueryNodeException [1] is thrown in the case of an error while parsing
the query.
However, I receive the following exception in such a case:
HTTP Status 500 - Can't find bundle for base name
Hi,
it is possible to create a new similarity class which returns the term
occurrences.
You have to disable Idf (just return1), normalization and co.
then you have to declare it in your schema:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SchemaXml#Similarity
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPlugins#Similarity
Hi guys,
I've just experienced an odd issue today with the following setup:
Test 1:
20 Shards
facet.limit=2 (returned facets 2-3)
about 5-6MB network traffic
Resp Time ca 3sec
Test 2:
20 Shards
facet.limit=100 (returned facets 2-3)
only a few kb network traffic
Resp Time ca 0.02sec
Function queries don't work with multivalued field.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery#Vector_Functions
You'll have to think in another way of doing that. What do you want to
achieve with that map?
Regards
Emmanuel
2011/9/8 tkamphuis tom_m...@hotmail.com
Hi,
I'm working on
Are you using facet.mincount in the query?
-Michael
yep - facet.mincount=1
Am Donnerstag, 8. September 2011 um 21:37 schrieb Michael Ryan:
Are you using facet.mincount in the query?
-Michael
yep - facet.mincount=1
Yeah, I've ran into this same issue, though I never looked too closely into it.
What is happening is that the facet.mincount parameter is removed when the
query is made to the shards, so each shard is returning about 3 facet
values, most of them with a count of 0. I
Now that is quite interesting indeed and sounds like a bug to me. Including
facets with a count of 0 we have a few 100k which then apparently get
transferred. hmhmhm
Can anyone with more knowledge of the facet component maybe chime in why the
miscount is removed?
Am Donnerstag, 8.
Hello,
When trying to implement pagination as in the case without grouping I see two
issues.
1. with rows=10 solr feed displays 10 groups not 10 results
2. there is no total number of results with grouping to show the last page.
In detail:
1. I need to display only 10 results in one page.
Thanks for the response. free -g reports:
totalusedfreesharedbuffers
cached
Mem: 141 95 46 0
093
-/+ buffers/cache: 2 139
Swap: 3 0 3
2011/9/7 François Schiettecatte
In our case it's clearly the wrong tradeoff :)
I'm going to patch our Solr for now, but either
- a config option
- a facet.whatever param
- or reversing the tradeoff
should be done in my eyes.
Am Donnerstag, 8. September 2011 um 22:34 schrieb Yonik Seeley:
So this is bad if you have a
: q=49 OR *
I don't think that query means what you think it means...
: Is there a way to tell Solr to only use fq and neglect q if no answer? Or
: am I doomed to send first request, realize I've got no answer and then send
: a second request?
what do you mean by no answer ?
I *think* what
Hi,
I am currently evaluating the FastVectorHighlighter in a Solr search based
project and have a couple of questions
1. Is there any specific reason why the FastVectorHighlighter does not
provide support for multiterm(wildcard) queries ?
2. What are the other constraints when using
FWiW I optimized the index down to a single segment and now I have no
trouble opening an MMapDirectory on that index, even though the 23G cfx
segment file remains.
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Rich Cariens richcari...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the response. free -g reports:
total
: When shooting a distributed query, we use facet.limit=1000. Then the merging
: SOLR combines the results. We also use facet.zeros=false to ensure returning
: only non-zero facet entries.
: The issue that we found is that there was a gap in time in the final results
: list (reverse sorted by
I'm wondering if anyone has attempted this. The general idea is to have a
FunctionQueryNode, Builder and Pipeline, where functions appear as
foo(param) within the query string. Further down the pipeline, Solr has
provided functionality for handling ValueSources. The only issue I have
: I would think I could index a lat,lon pair into a GeoHashField (that
: works) and then retrieve the field value to see the computed geohash.
...
: What am I missing - how can I retrieve the hash?
I don't think it's designed to work that way.
GeoHashField provides GeoHash based search
I should add some more context:
1. the problem index included several cfs segment files that were around
4.7G, and
2. I'm running four SOLR instances on the same box, all of which have
similiar problem indeces.
A colleague thought perhaps I was bumping up against my 256,000 open
(11/09/09 6:16), Rahul Warawdekar wrote:
Hi,
I am currently evaluating the FastVectorHighlighter in a Solr search based
project and have a couple of questions
1. Is there any specific reason why the FastVectorHighlighter does not
provide support for multiterm(wildcard) queries ?
2. What are
Is there an easy way without out writing custom response writers to accept a
parameter on the request URL and then substitute that value in the response?
For example, if an index field is setup and a value like the following is
added to a field:
http://www.google.com/?partner={$partner}
: Is there an easy way without out writing custom response writers to accept a
: parameter on the request URL and then substitute that value in the response?
there's nothing built in to support this using the syntax you are asking
about, but one approach to consider instead of writing a custom
Do you need to use the compound format?
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Rich Cariens richcari...@gmail.com wrote:
I should add some more context:
1. the problem index included several cfs segment files that were around
4.7G, and
2. I'm running four SOLR instances on the same box, all
There are 2 use cases:
1. rows=10 means 10 groups.
2. rows=10 means to results (irregardless of groups).
I thought there was a total number of groups (ngroups) or case #1.
I don't believe case #2 has been coded.
On 9/8/11 2:22 PM, alx...@aim.com alx...@aim.com wrote:
Hello,
When trying
Hi again,
After reading a bit more, IBM no longer supports the JDBC driver for Lotus
Notes. Instead the Notes.jar API is recommended. So I'll go with that, as
Oleg suggested.
2011/9/6 Tobias Berg tobias.h...@gmail.com
Thanks Jan,
I will look into using the JDBC driver.
/Tobias
2011/9/5
47 matches
Mail list logo
