Hi,
got a question about index optimizing.
At midnight i am calling optimize(true, true) on my SolrServer instance.
However this does fail with:
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServerException:
java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out
at
Hello,
AFAIK Particularly this exception is not a big deal. It's just one of the
evidence of the fact that CachedSqlEntityProcessor doesn't work in multiple
threads at 3.x and 4.0. It's discussed at
http://search-lucene.com/m/0DNn32L2UBv
the most problem here is the following messages in the log
Hi,
I'm trying to understand caching, looking on the wiki I can see that Solr
directly or indirectly uses Lucene's fieldCache and also it has it's own
fieldValueCache. They seem to store the same entries - field values.
How does Solr use both of these caches, or are they the same thing?
Hi,
I have an solr index for an online shop with a field price which
contains the standard price of a product.
But in the database, the shop owner can specify a period of time with
an alternative price.
For example: standard price is $20.00, but 12/24/11 08:00am to
12/26/11 11:59pm = $12.59
Of
Hi everyone,
A couple of days back I encountered a weird problem of continuously
increasing memory consumption. I am not sure if this is a problem of java
or Solr (3.4).
Till 3 days ago, we were running Solr 3.4 instance with following java
command line options
java -server -*Xms2048m*
Solr doesn't support these kind of business rules inside of it. Not
intended to.
Thusly, you will have to manage them externally. What's unstable about a
cronjob?
You will have to run your business rules externally, then apply the
necessary
field updates to the documents in Solr, ensuring the
Hi Mark,
I'm sure you can manage this using function queries somehow, but this is
rather complicated, esp. if you both want to return the price and sort
on it.
I'd rather update the index as soon as a campaign starts or ends. At
least that's how we did it when I worked for online shops.
(11/12/02 4:20), Aaron Wong wrote:
Hi all,
We're encountering a problem with querying terms with dashes (and other
non-alphanumeric characters). For example, we
use PatternReplaceCharFilterFactory to replace dashes with blank characters
for both index and query, however any terms with dashes in
On 02. des. 2011 12:21, Mark Schoy wrote:
Hi,
I have an solr index for an online shop with a field price which
contains the standard price of a product.
But in the database, the shop owner can specify a period of time with
an alternative price.
For example: standard price is $20.00, but
Hi Morten,
thanks, this is a very good solution.
I also found another solution:
Creating a custom ValueSourceParser for price sorting which considered
the standard price and the campaign price.
In my special case I think your approach isn't working, because i also
need result grouping and this
Hi Morten,
thanks, this is a very good solution.
I also found another solution:Creating a custom ValueSourceParser for
price sorting which consideredthe standard price and the campaign
price.
In my special case I think your approach isn't working, because i
alsoneed result grouping and this cant
Hi,
In my company we have the same need, import from Hbase into Solr
We just started a project here:
http://code.google.com/p/hbase-solr-dataimport/
We want to provide an easy way to import data from HBase, similar to
SqlEntityProcessor
Gian Marco
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 4:37 AM, Fuad
So I dunno. You are running a zk server and running in zk mode right?
You don't need to / shouldn't set a shards or self param. The shards are
figured out from Zookeeper.
You always want to use the distrib-update-chain. Eventually it will
probably be part of the default chain and auto turn in zk
Also, not entirely sure wild-cards are supported in text based fields, only
on strings. Although things may have changed in recent versions of Solr, I
am not sure.
R
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Koji Sekiguchi k...@r.email.ne.jp wrote:
Suppose my search query is *Rak*.In my database i have
Thanks for the info
On 12/2/11 1:29 AM, Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
Hello,
AFAIK Particularly this exception is not a big deal. It's just one of the
evidence of the fact that CachedSqlEntityProcessor doesn't work in multiple
threads at 3.x and 4.0. It's discussed at
Glad to hear I don't need to set shards/self, but removing them didn't
seem to change what I'm seeing. Doing this still results in 2
documents 1 on 8983 and 1 on 7574.
String key = 1;
SolrInputDocument solrDoc = new SolrInputDocument();
solrDoc.setField(key,
I've put the question nicely formatted on StackOverflow here
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8360257/solr-lucene-why-is-this-or-query-failing-when-the-two-individual-queries-suc
Here is that question Verbatim:
I have a Solr document schema with with a solr.TrieDateField and noticed
this
They are unused params, so removing them wouldn't help anything.
You might just want to wait till we are further along before playing with it.
Or if you submit your full self contained test, I can see what's going on (eg
its still unclear if you have started setting numShards?).
I can do a
So I'm a fool. I did set the numShards, the issue was so trivial it's
embarrassing. I did indeed have it setup as a replica, the shard
names in solr.xml were both shard1. This worked as I expected now.
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
They are unused
Hi I have a webapp that plots a bunch of time series
Data which are just doubles coupled with a timestamp
Every chart in my webapp has a reportid in my db and i am wondering if it would
be effective to usr solr to serve the data th my app instead of keeping the
data in my rdbms.
Currently im
Hi,
I have a use case where in I need to provide autocomplete from both values
in a index field and a dictionary file.
I am planning to use Solr Suggester. On reading the documentation I am
getting the idea that terms can be either from a field or from a dictionary
but not both. Can this behavior
Can anyone advise techniques for limiting the size of the RAM buffers to
begin with? As the index grows, I shouldn't have to keep increasing the
heap. We have a high-ingest, low-query-rate environment and I'm not as
much concerned with the query-time caches as I am with the segment core
Hi,
Is it possible to do case insensitive suggestions via Solr suggester. On
reading the documentation it seems like there is no option for that. Can
anyone please give suggestions on how to deal with this.
--
View this message in context:
Interesting info.
You should look into using Solid State Drives. I moved my search engine to
SSD and saw dramatic improvements.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Huge-Performance-Solr-distributed-search-tp3530627p346.html
Sent from the Solr - User
We are creating an index of about 500 - 600M records fairly small documents.
We are currently @ 252M+ records and adding documents at a rate of about 2k -
3k per second in multithreaded 1K batches sent from multiple servers. Our
commits started bombing out with out of Memory Exceptions with
: But I stil don't understand why in solr 1.4 that option was efficient
: but in solr 3.5 not
Good question ... i'm not really sure.
Frankly i forgot that option even existed (i missread your stack trace and
thought it was just generating the DocSet for faceting ... that's why i
wanted to see
Ah, okay - you are setting the shards in solr.xml - thats still an option
to force a node to a particular shard - but if you take that out, shards
will be auto assigned.
By the way, because of the version code, distrib deletes don't work at the
moment - will get to that next week.
- Mark
On
Take a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2703, which
integrates the surround parser into Solr trunk. There's a dependency on a
Lucene patch which resolves a caching problem (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2945 ) which also wasn't
backported to earlier versions of
oops, didn't see all of the thread before I hit send. Good work, Erik
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 5:21 PM, simon mtnes...@gmail.com wrote:
Take a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2703, which
integrates the surround parser into Solr trunk. There's a dependency on a
Lucene patch
: Till 3 days ago, we were running Solr 3.4 instance with following java
: command line options
: java -server -*Xms2048m* -*Xmx4096m* -Dsolr.solr.home=etc -jar start.jar
:
: Then we increased the memory with following options and restarted the
: server
: java -server *-**Xms4096m* -*Xmx10g*
: I don't think there is a way of seeing the boosts from the index, as
: those are encoded as norms (together with length normalization). You can
: see the norms with Luke if you want to and in the debugQuery output the
...
:
How does it determine the number of shards to create? How many
replicas to create?
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah, okay - you are setting the shards in solr.xml - thats still an option
to force a node to a particular shard - but if you take that
I think I see it.so if I understand this correctly you specify
numShards as a system property, as new nodes come up they check ZK to
see if they should be a new shard or a replica based on if numShards
is met. A few questions if a master goes down does a replica get
promoted? If a new shard
So I just tried this out, seems like it does the things I asked about.
Really really cool stuff, it's progressed quite a bit in the time
since I took a snapshot of the branch.
Last question, how do you change numShards? Is there a command you
can use to do this now? I understand there will be
34 matches
Mail list logo
