Hello ML,
I wonder if it is possibile to define a boost for certains fields in schema.xml
configuration. As far, I have found ways to define a boost while indexing and
while querying, so I suspect the straight answer is no. Anyway, I'd like a
confirm, if possible.
Thank you in advance
S
Hi all,
My Solr Configuration had one multi-valued field which is imported using
XPathEntityProcess and TemplateTransformer . Then we had to convert it to
non-multivlaued field, We did that using PlainTextEntityProcessor and Script
Transformer.
Search on my old configuration was working fine ,
Hi,
We are storing a large number of tweets and blogs feeds into solr.
Now if the user searches for twitter mentions like, @rohit , records which
just contain the word rohit are also being returned. Even if we do an exact
match @rohit, I understand this happens because of use of
Hi Mauro,
During the first pass search the sort param is used to determine the top N
groups. Then during the second pass search the documents inside the top N
groups are sorted using the group.sort parameter. The group.sort doesn't
change how the groups them self are sorted.
Martijn
On 11
Hi,
In my SOLR, I have a query based data-config written and was able to manage
below steps but i was not able to see the output
1) Register Data Import Request handler in Solr-config.xml
2) Modify Data-Config.xml for the appropriate query to get data imported from
which includes making use
Dear ML,
I'm performing some developments relying on spatial capabilities of solr.
I'm using Solr 3.5, have been reading
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpatialSearch#Spatial_Query_Parameters and
have the basic behaviours I wanted working.
I use geofilt on a latlong field, with geodist() in the
Hello all,
Recently i saw couple of discussions in LinkedIn group about generating
large data set or data corpus. I have compiled the same in to an article.
Hope it would be helpful. If you have any other links where we could get
large data set for free, please reply to this mail thread, i will
While indexing @ is removed. You need to use your own Tokenizer which will
consider @rohit as one word.
Another option is to break the tweet in to two fields, @username and the
tweet. Index both the fields but don't use any tokenizer for the field
@username. Just index as it is. While querying
Hi,
Is it possible to configure solr using solrcloud and the distribution handler
such that if a new core is added to the master then that core is added and
replicated to the slaves.
Phil
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Rajdeep Alapati
rajdeep.alap...@benefitfocus.com wrote:
[...]
5) Make full import http request for data to get indexed into solr server.
Even though i see that all the rows are indexed but not able to find results
when search is clicked on the admin page
Hi Mohanty,
I have entered *:* in the search box and the url it redirected to was
http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=*%3A*version=2.2start=0rows=10indent=on;
and the output was the below content where i expected 3 rows in 3 items
Thanks
Raj Deep Alapati
?xml version=1.0
Hi list,
after changing DIH to multi-theaded (4 threads) I get sometimes an exception.
This is not always the case and I never had any problems with single-threaded
at all.
I'm using Solr 3.5 but also tried branch_3x (3.6) and could see this with both
versions.
Don't know why this comes up
Call for Submission Berlin Buzzwords 2012 - Search, Store, Scale --
June 4 / 5. 2012
The event will comprise presentations on scalable data processing. We
invite you to submit talks on the topics:
* IR / Search - Lucene, Solr, katta, ElasticSearch or comparable solutions
* NoSQL - like
I'm not going to be much help here since DIH is a mystery to me, I usually go
with a SolrJ program when DIH gets beyond simple cases. But have you
seen:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#interactive
It's a tool that helps you see what's going on with your query.
Best
Erick
On Mon,
Hello all,
Recently i've been trying to tweak some aspects of relevancy in one listing
project.
I need to give a higher score to newer documents and also boost the
document based on a boolean field that indicates the listing has pictures.
On top of that, in some situations we need a random
After browsing through the issues it looks like something belonging to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2694
Am 11.01.2012 14:08, schrieb Bernd Fehling:
Hi list,
after changing DIH to multi-theaded (4 threads) I get sometimes an exception.
This is not always the case and I never
Dave:
That's actually an interesting way to use WordDelimiterFitlerFactory.
I think you're
being bitten by the difference between analysis and query parsing. The analysis
page bypasses query parsing and throws the input against the exact field
you specified, without any, well, parsing.
But when
I'm not sure what custom field types have to do with XML here.
Somewhere, you have to have defined a *field* in your schema.xml
that references your custom type, something like:
field name=the_offer type=offer . /
then the XML is just like any other field
doc
field name=the_offer
In our setup, we handle the document distribution and uniqueness across cores
outside of Solr.
--
Hector
On Jan 11, 2012, at 1:53 AM, shlomi java wrote:
Straying a bit from the subject,
don't you think it will be useful to have the shards parameter used also in
the index, in order to
Hello,
I have a catchall field, and I need to do some request in all fields of
that catchall field, minus one. To avoid duplicating my index, I'd like to
know if there is a way to use my catch field while excluding that one field.
Thanks,
Elisabeth
Several questions:
1 did you commit after the full import?
2 have you tried looking at the interactive DIH console? See:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#interactive
3 Do your Solr logs show anything?
Best
Erick
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Rajdeep Alapati
I don't know of any way to do this. The closest you can come
to what I infer you want would be to define an edismax
query handler in solrconfig.xml and assign boosts automatically
when querying. Or you can apply boosts at index time by
specifying a boost attribute in the XML.
Best
Erick
On Wed,
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Rajdeep Alapati
rajdeep.alap...@benefitfocus.com wrote:
Hi Mohanty,
I have entered *:* in the search box and the url it redirected to was
http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=*%3A*version=2.2start=0rows=10indent=on;
OK, this looks fine: I was just wondering
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Mike O'Leary tmole...@uw.edu wrote:
[...]
My data-config.xml file looks like this:
dataConfig
dataSource type=JdbcDataSource driver=com.mysql.jdbc.Driver
url=jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/bioscope user=db_user
password=/
document name=bioscope
Well, are you sure that the data is *in* the index? Did you change
maxFieldLength in solrconfig.xml?
First, I'd be sure that the data is in the stored field to highlight.
Best
Erick
Out of curiosity, why did you have to change from multValued?
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 3:29 AM, meghana
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 6:38 AM, Phil Hoy p...@friendsreunited.co.ukwrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to configure solr using solrcloud and the distribution
handler such that if a new core is added to the master then that core is
added and replicated to the slaves.
Phil
Hey Phil,
Not currently.
I really don't understand what this means:
random sorting for the records but also preserving the ranking
Either you're sorting on rank or you're not. If you mean you're
trying to shift things around just a little bit, *mostly* respecting
relevance then I guess you can do what you're thinking.
Hmmm, Once the data is included in the catch-all, it's indistinguishable from
all the rest of the data, so I don't see how you could do this. A clause like:
-excludeField:[* TO *] would exclude all documents that had any data in
the field so that's probably not what you want.
Could you
My point is this - *everyone *using shards needs to handle that uniqueness.
Why not make it as a mechanism in Solr, with the ability to plugin our own
implementation of the hashing method?
Or is that what Solr Cloud is all about?
SJ
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Hector Castro
Thanks Martijn. I know what you mean, but in my case I want to sort the groups
using both sort keys and then inside each group it should use the
group.sort.
If you take a look at the query you will see both regular sorting keys
sort=location_weight_i desc, weight_i desc. The issue here is
I was doing some reading on the new features and whatnot, and I am interested
in upgrading. I have a few questions though:
1) The index seemed to have changed, can I reuse the current index or should
I reindex the data? I read some things about optimizing the index and
whatnot, but I am not clear
Hi,
when I request a query to solr with
/solr/select?q=querydebugQuery=trueqf=title
I get no result.
The debug information tells me this.
str name=querystringquery/str
str name=parsedquerytext:query/str
When I request a query to solr with /solr/select?q=title:querydebugQuery=true
I get the
Because you're using the lucene query parser which doesn't use qf. Add
defType=dismax to get the effect you want.
Erik
On Jan 11, 2012, at 12:22, Matthias Müller mm4...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
when I request a query to solr with
/solr/select?q=querydebugQuery=trueqf=title
I get no
Erick,
Probably I really written something silly. You are right on either sorting
by field or ranking.
I just need to change the ranking to shift things around as you said.
To clarify the use case:
We have a listing aggregator that gets product listings from a lot of
different sites and since
FYI,
it's https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2804
I'm trying to address it.
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Bernd Fehling
bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de wrote:
After browsing through the issues it looks like something belonging to
It's my fault for not contributing it back while I was at Netflix, but I need
the feature I implemented four years ago to use fuzzy search in the qf
parameter.
It looks like another person has implemented this as SOLR-629.
How do we get this back on the release train?
wunder
--
Walter
Hi Hector,
On Jan 9, 2012, at 4:15pm, Hector Castro wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone had success with multicore single node Solr configurations that
have one core acting solely as a dispatcher for the other cores? For
example, say you had 4 populated Solr cores – configure a 5th to be the
I'm implementing a feature where admins have the ability to control the
order of the results by adding a boost to any specific search.
The search is a faceted interface (no text input) and which we take a
hash of the search parameters (to form a unique search id) and then
boost that field for
Alexandre:
Have you thought about grouping? If you can analyze the incoming
documents and include a field such that similar documents map
to the same value, than group on that value you'll get output that
isn't dominated by repeated copies of the similar documents. It
depends, though, on being
Short form: It's always best to re-index if possible.
1 Should work, indexes are supposed to be backwards-compatible
across one release. But I'd still re-index if possible. WARNING:
as you add documents etc. when, say, a merge happens, the
newly merged segments will NOT be readable
Boosts are fairly coarse-grained. I suspect your boost factors are just
being rounded into the same buckets. Attaching debugQuery=on and
looking at how the scores were calculated should help you figure out
if this is the case.
Best
Erick
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Brett br...@chopshop.org
I think the OP meant to use random order in the case of score ties.
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.comwrote:
Alexandre:
Have you thought about grouping? If you can analyze the incoming
documents and include a field such that similar documents map
to the
Thanks for the reply, Ken – it was your training session that brought the
dispatcher core approach to my attention in the first place.
Regarding your deep query point, if you're in a situation where numFound=5000
and you're trying to output all 5000 records at once – your point seems to
Hello,
I am Looking into trigger point for sharding Indexes based on response time
,and would like to define an acceptable response time.
Given a 3GB index ,when Can i think of sharding .The response times being
variable based on the query and varies from 100ms to
600ms .We are running solr
that's it.
thanks!
Hi Solr Users,
Does anyone happen to know if the keyword partialResults be used in a solr
http request? (partialResults is turned off at the .xml level)
Something like: http://server:8080/solr/master/select?distrib=true
Hi Mohanty,
Can you please guess what is happening on my side. Any help would be great
Thanks
Raj Deep Alapati
From: Gora Mohanty [g...@mimirtech.com]
Sent: 11 January 2012 17:15
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Not able to see the output when
Hi Mikhail,
thanks for pointing me to the issue.
Regards, Bernd
Am 11.01.2012 21:47, schrieb Mikhail Khludnev:
FYI,
it's https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2804
I'm trying to address it.
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Bernd Fehling
bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de wrote:
After
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Rajdeep Alapati
rajdeep.alap...@benefitfocus.com wrote:
Hi Mohanty,
Can you please guess what is happening on my side. Any help would be great
[...]
People have followed up to you in your original thread.
Could you please respond there, and provide the
49 matches
Mail list logo
