I use the xml to index the data. One filed might contains some characters
like '' =
It seems that will produce the error
I modify that filed doesn't index, but it doesn't work. I need to store the
filed, but index might not be indexed.
Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
Hello,
We keep hitting the too many open files exception. Looking at lsof we have
a lot (several thousand) of entries like this:
java 19339 root 1619u sock0,7 0t0
682291383 can't identify protocol
However, netstat -a doesn't show any of these.
Can
Are you running trunk and have auto-commit enabled? Then disable
auto-commit. Even if you increase ulimits it will continue to swallow
all available file descriptors.
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 10:13:55 +, Colin Howe co...@conversocial.com
wrote:
Hello,
We keep hitting the too many open files
Currently using 3.4.0. We have autocommit enabled but we manually do
commits every 100 documents anyway... I can turn it off if you think that
might help.
Cheers,
Colin
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Markus Jelsma
markus.jel...@openindex.iowrote:
Are you running trunk and have auto-commit
I had the same problem, without auto-commit.
I never really found out what exactly the reason was, but I think it was
because commits were triggered before a previous commit had the chance
to finish.
We now commit after every minute or 1000 (quite large) documents,
whatever comes first. And
I was wondering: is it possible to sort a Solr result-set on a non-stored value?
Thank you
Am 14.03.2012 11:43, schrieb Finotti Simone:
I was wondering: is it possible to sort a Solr result-set on a non-stored value?
Yes, it is. It must be indexed, indeed.
-Kuli
it should be indexed by not analyzed. it don't need stored.
reading field values from stored fields is extremely slow.
So lucene will use StringIndex to read fields for sort. so if you want to
sort by some field, you should index this field and don't analyze it.
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 6:43 PM,
There is a class org.apache.solr.common.util.XML in solr
you can use this wrapper:
public static String escapeXml(String s) throws IOException{
StringWriter sw=new StringWriter();
XML.escapeCharData(s, sw);
return sw.getBuffer().toString();
}
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012
After some more digging around I discovered that there was a bug reported
in jetty 6: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JETTY-1458
This prompted me to upgrade to Jetty 7 and things look a bit more stable
now :)
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Michael Kuhlmann k...@solarier.de wrote:
I had
Well, this is another error. Looks like you are using cores and you are not
adding the core name to the URL. Make sure you do it:
http://localhost:8585/solr/[CORENAME]/update/extract?literal.id=1commit=true
The core name is the one you defined in solr.xml and should always be used
in the URL. If
Ah, good to know! Thank you!
I already had Jetty under suspicion, but we had this failure quite often
in October and November, when the bug was not yet reported.
-Kuli
Am 14.03.2012 12:08, schrieb Colin Howe:
After some more digging around I discovered that there was a bug reported
in jetty
Hello,
I have a use case where the facet hierarchies as well as facet names change
very frequently.
For example:
(Smartphones Android ) may become
Smartphones GSM And roid.
OR
Smartphone could be renamed to Smart Phone
If I use traditional hierarchical faceting, then every
Bug ticket created:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3245
I also made test you ask with english dictionary.
The results are in the ticket.
Agnieszka
-Original Message-
From: Jan Høydahl [mailto:jan@cominvent.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 12:54 AM
To:
Colin:
FYI, you might consider just setting up the autocommit (or commitWithin if
you're using SolrJ) for some reasonable interval (I often use 10 minutes or so).
Even though you've figured it is a Tomcat issue, each
commit causes searcher re-opens, perhaps replication in a master/slave
setup,
Is there a way mark a master as write only and the slaves as read only? I
guess I could just remove those handlers from the config?
Is there a benefit from doing this as far as performance or anything else?
Thanks,
Mike
On Mar 14, 2012, at 12:03 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
Is there a way to force Solr to do a replication without restarting
when in SolrCloud?
You mean force a recovery? If so, then yes: there is a CoreAdminCommand
(http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin#CoreAdminHandler) called
REQUESTRECOVERY.
Thanks!
Does the schema.xml support this parameter? I am using the example post.jar
to index my file.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-avoid-the-unexpected-character-error-tp3824726p3825959.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at
Great, so to be clear I would execute the following correct?
http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/cores?action=REQUESTRECOVERYcore=slice1_shard2
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 14, 2012, at 12:03 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
Is there a way to force
Yeah, that looks right to me.
On Mar 14, 2012, at 12:54 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
Great, so to be clear I would execute the following correct?
http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/cores?action=REQUESTRECOVERYcore=slice1_shard2
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com
Did your configuration works ?
i have the same issue and i dont know if it works...
i have 2 servers. each with 2 solr instances (one for updates other for
searching) now i need replication from solr1 to solr2. but what the hell do
solr if master crashed ???
-
I'm looking at the solr admin interface site. On the dashboard right
panel, I see three sections with size numbers like 227MB(light),
124MB(darker), and 14MB(darkest).
I'm on a windows server.
Couple questions about what I see in the solr app admin interface:
- In the top right section of the
Hello everybody,
I am designing a new Solr architecture for one of my clients. This sorl
architecture is for a high-traffic website with million of visitors but I am
facing some design problems were I hope you guys could help me out.
In my situation there are 4 Solr servers running, 1 server is
We have a very similar system. In our case we have a row version field in our
sql database. When we run the full import we keep track of the latest row
version at the time that the full import started. Once the full import is done
we run an optimize and then run a delta import (actually this is
Hello all,
We have a SOLR index filled with user queries and we want to retrieve the
ones that are more similar to a given query entered by an end-user. It is
kind of a related queries system.
The index is pretty big and we're using early-termination of queries (with
the index sorted so that the
The odd thing is that if I optimize the index it doubles in size.. If I
then, add one more document to the index it goes back down to half size?
Is there a way to force this without needing to wait until another document
is added? Or do you have more information on what you think is going on?
I'm
Well, the point is as follows.
We have a mysql table where all the changes are tracked something very
simular to your situation. The first problem is that, the delta-import on
the live core needs to update this table to notify a record is done. I do
this very awfull now within a script
Another note.. if I reload solr app
it goes back down in size.
here is my replication settings on the master:
requestHandler name=/replication
class=solr.ReplicationHandler
lst name=master
str
name=replicateAfterstartup/str
str
name=replicateAftercommit/str
SOLR-3033 is related to ReplcationHandler's ability to do backups. It allows
you to specify how many backups you want to keep. You don't seem to have any
backups configured here so it is not an applicable parameter (note that
SOLR-3033 was committed to trunk recently but the config param was
Thanks. I might just remove the optimize. I had it planned for once a
week but maybe I'll just do it and restart the app if performance slows.
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Dyer, James james.d...@ingrambook.comwrote:
SOLR-3033 is related to ReplcationHandler's ability to do backups. It
On 3/14/2012 2:54 PM, Mike Austin wrote:
The odd thing is that if I optimize the index it doubles in size.. If I
then, add one more document to the index it goes back down to half size?
Is there a way to force this without needing to wait until another document
is added? Or do you have more
On 3/14/2012 12:58 PM, KeesSchepers wrote:
1. I wipe the reindex core
2. I run the DIH to the complete dataset (4 million documents) in peices of
20.000 records (to prevent very long mysql locks)
3. After the DIH is finished (2 hours) we have to also have to update the
rebuild core with changes
Hello all,
I've been working on a plugin with a custom component and a few handlers for a
research project. It's aim is to do some interesting distributed work, however
I seem to have come to a road block when trying to respond to a clients request
in multiple steps. Not even sure if this is
no, it's nothing to do with schema.xml
post.jar just post a file, it don't parse this file.
solr will use xml parser to parse this file. if you don't escape special
characters, it's not a valid xml file and solr will throw exceptions.
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:33 AM, neosky neosk...@yahoo.com
Every night I dump my mySql db and load it into a development db. I have also
configured solr as multicore with production and development as the cores. In
order to keep my index on development current, I figured I could do a create to
a new core, transition, every night, and then swap
Shawn,
Thanks for the detailed answer! I will play around with this information in
hand. Maybe a second optimize or just a dummy commit after the optimize
will help get me past this. Both not the best options, but maybe it's a do
it because it's running on windows work-around. If it is indeed a
Why don't you just use that formula and calculate the weighted rating for
each movie and index that value? sort=wrating desc
Maybe I didn't understand your question.
mike
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Zac Smith z...@trinkit.com wrote:
Does anyone have an example formula that can be used to
how many memory are allocated to JVM?
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Husain, Yavar yhus...@firstam.com wrote:
Solr is giving out of memory exception. Full Indexing was completed fine.
Later while searching maybe when it tries to load the results in memory it
starts giving this exception.
Thanks for helping me out.
I have allocated Xms-2.0GB Xmx-2.0GB
However i see Tomcat is still using pretty less memory and not 2.0G
Total Memory on my Windows Machine = 4GB.
With smaller index size it is working perfectly fine. I was thinking of
increasing the system RAM tomcat heap space
39 matches
Mail list logo
