Hi All,
I tried to index with UTF-8 encode but the issue is still not fixed.
Please see my inputs below.
*Indexed XML:*
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8 ?
add
doc
field name=ID0.100/field
field name=BODYµ/field
/doc
/add
*Search Query - * BODY:µ
numfound : 0 results
Does anyone explain what does the following parameters mean in SOLR cache
statistics?
*name*: queryResultCache
*class*: org.apache.solr.search.LRUCache
*version*: 1.0
*description*: LRU Cache(maxSize=512, initialSize=512)
*stats*: lookups : 98
*hits *: 59
*hitratio *: 0.60
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 03:46:56PM +, Michael Ludwig wrote:
Von: Walter Underwood
German noun decompounding is a little more complicated than it might
seem.
There can be transformations or inflections, like the s in
Weinachtsbaum (Weinachten/Baum).
I remember from my
another way is to use payload http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Payloads
the advantage of payload is that you only need one field and can make frq
file smaller than use two fields. but the disadvantage is payload is stored
in prx file, so I am not sure which one is fast. maybe you can try them
both.
On
Did I get right that you have two separate processes (different app) access
the same LuceneDIrectory simultaneously? In this case I suggest to read
about Locking mechanism. I'm not really experienced in it.
You showed logs from StrUpdHandler failure, it's clear. Can you show logs
from Embeded
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCaching
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Kashif Khan uplink2...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anyone explain what does the following parameters mean in SOLR cache
statistics?
*name*: queryResultCache
*class*: org.apache.solr.search.LRUCache
*version*: 1.0
Von: Tomas Zerolo
There can be transformations or inflections, like the s in
Weinachtsbaum (Weinachten/Baum).
I remember from my linguistics studies that the terminus technicus
for these is Fugenmorphem (interstitial or joint morpheme) [...]
IANAL (I am not a linguist -- pun
Thank you very much Erick for your reply!
So should it go something like the following:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/file/n3907393/solr_index.png
sorry for an ugly drawing ;)
In this example, the index will have 13 columns: 6 for project, 6 for
contractor and one to define the type. Is
Hi Erick,
Thanks for your suggestions.
I did an optimize on the remote installation and this time with the
same number of documents but still face the same issue as seen from
the debug output below:
9.950362E-4 = (MATCH) sum of:
9.950362E-4 = (MATCH) weight(RECORD_TYPE:info in 35916),
Thanks a lot. I had already implemented Walter's solution and was wondering
if this was the right way to deal with it. This has now given me the
confidence to go with the solution.
Many thanks.
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.comwrote:
GAH! I had my head in
Hi,
Thanks for your answer.
Yes it works in this case when I know the facet name (Computer). What
if I want to automatically compute all facets?
facet.query=keyword:* short_title:* doesn't work, right?
Marc.
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Li Li,
I have been through that WIKI before but that does not explain what is
*evictions*, *inserts*, *cumulative_inserts*, *cumulative_evictions*,
*hitratio *and all. These terms are foreign to me. What does the following
line mean?
*item_ABC :
Hello,
I am new to Solr. it is resulting some docs in my search for Acciones y
Valores string. When i go and search for the same word in the given doc
manually, i could not find those word. Pls help on what basis the doc is
found in the search .
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
A discussion over on the dev list led me to expect that the by-if
field retrievals in a SolrCloud query would come through the get
handler. In fact, I've seen them turn up in my search component in the
search handler that is configured with my custom QT. (I have a
'prepare' method that sets
Please review:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists
Especially the bit about adding debugQuery=on
and showing the results. You're asking people
to guess at solutions without providing much
in the way of context.
You might try looking at your index with Luke to
see what's actually in
bq: Is that right?
I don't know, does it work G? You'll probably want an
additional field for unique id (just named id in the example)
that should be disjoint between your types.
Best
Erick
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 3:41 AM, tkoomzaaskz tomasz.du...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you very much Erick for
Well, next thing I'd do is just copy your entire solr home
directory to the remote machine and try that. If that gives
identical results on both, then try moving just your
solr home/data directory to the remote machine.
I suspect that you've done something different between the two
machines
Fine. Thank you. I will look at it.
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.comwrote:
Please review:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists
Especially the bit about adding debugQuery=on
and showing the results. You're asking people
to guess at solutions
Nope. Information about your higher level use-case
would probably be a good thing, this is starting to
smell like an XY problem.
Best
Erick
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 5:48 AM, Marc SCHNEIDER
marc.schneide...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your answer.
Yes it works in this case when I know the
Hi Team,
A very-very thanks to you guy who had developed such a nice product.
I have one query regarding solr that I have app 36 Million data in my solr
and I wants to export all the data to a csv file but I have found nothing on
the same so please help me on this topic .
Regards
Well, the place to start is here:
*stats*: lookups : 98
*hits *: 59
*hitratio *: 0.60
*inserts *: 41
*evictions *: 0
*size *: 41
the important bits are hitratio and evictions.
Caches only really start to show their stuff
when the hit ratio is quite high. That's
the percentage of requests that
Well, I guess my first question is whether using stirngs
is fast enough, in which case there's little reason to
make your life more complex.
But yes, range queries will be significantly faster with
any of the Trie types than with strings. Trie types are
all numeric types.
Best
Erick
On Fri,
Please review:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists
there's so little information to go on here that I
really can't say anything that isn't a guess.
At a minimum we need the raw input, the
fieldType definitions from your schema,
the results of adding debugQuery=on
to your URL
Best
Does this help?
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CSVResponseWriter
Best
Erick
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Pavnesh
pavnesh.ku...@altruistindia.com wrote:
Hi Team,
A very-very thanks to you guy who had developed such a nice product.
I have one query regarding solr that I have app 36
Yes
brbrbr--- Original Message ---
On 4/13/2012 06:25 AM Benson Margulies wrote:brA discussion over on the dev
list led me to expect that the by-if
brfield retrievals in a SolrCloud query would come through the get
brhandler. In fact, I've seen them turn up in my search component in
A combination of the CSV response writer and SOLRJ to page through all of the
results sending it to something like apache commons fileutils:
FileUtils.writeStringToFile(new File(output.csv), outputLine
(line.separator), true);
Would be quiet quick to knock up in Java.
Thanks
thank you for the response.
it seems to be working well ;)
1) i tried your suggestion about removing the qt parameter -
*somecore/partItemNoSearch*q=dishwasherdebugQuery=onrows=10
but this results in a 404 error message - is there some configuration i am
missing to support this short-hand
as to 1) you have to define your request handler with
a leading /, as in name= /partItemNoSearch. Don't
forget to restart your server.
3) Of course. The input terms MUST be run through
the associated analysis chain to have any hope of
matching correctly.
Best
Erick
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 8:36
Hello
We have just switched to Solr4 as we needed the ability to return geodist()
along with our results.
I use a simple multithreaded java app and solr to ingest the data. We keep
seeing the following:
13-Apr-2012 15:50:10 org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log
SEVERE:
Hi Shawn,
Thanks for the information, let me give this a try, since this is a live box I
will try it during the weekend and update you.
Regards,
Rohit
Mobile: +91-9901768202
About Me: http://about.me/rohitg
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Heisey [mailto:s...@elyograg.org]
Sent: 13
I am trying to use method that is suggested in solr forum to remove CDATA
part of xml. but it is not working. result show whole xml content instead of
CDATA part.
schema.xml
fieldType name=text_ws2 class=solr.TextField
positionIncrementGap=100
analyzer type=index
tokenizer
not sure why CDATA part did not get interpreted. this is how xml content
looks like. I added quotes just to present the exact content xml content.
body/body
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-is-not-extracting-the-CDATA-part-of-xml-tp3908317p3908341.html
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I guess my first question is whether using stirngs
is fast enough, in which case there's little reason to
make your life more complex.
But yes, range queries will be significantly faster with
any of the Trie
Trying to maintain the Drupal integration module across multiple versions
of 3.x, we've gotten a bug report suggesting that Solr 3.6 needs this
change to solrconfig:
-
mergePolicyorg.apache.lucene.index.LogByteSizeMergePolicy/mergePolicy
+mergePolicy
It looks like the first format was removed in 3.6 as part of
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1052. The second format works in all
3.x versions.
-Michael
-Original Message-
From: Peter Wolanin [mailto:peter.wola...@acquia.com]
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 12:32 PM
To:
Ok, thanks for the info. As long as the second one works, we can just use
that.
I just verified that it works for 3.5 at least.
-Peter
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Michael Ryan mr...@moreover.com wrote:
It looks like the first format was removed in 3.6 as part of
Solr does not index arbitrary XML content. There is and XML
form of a solr document that can be sent to Solr, but it is
a specific form of XML.
An example of the XML you're trying to index and what you mean
by not working would be helpful.
Best
Erick
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:50 AM, srini
Erick,
Thanks for your reply. when you say Solr does not index arbitery xml
document, then below is the way my xml document looks like which is sitting
in oracle. Could you suggest the best of indexing it ? which method should I
follow? Should I use XPathEntityProcessor?
?xml version=1.0
Right, that will not work at all for direct transmission to
Solr.
You could write a Java program that parses this and sends
it to Solr via SolrJ.
Personally I haven't connected a database to Solr with
XPathEntityProcessor in the mix, but I believe I've seen
messages go by with this
Hi
This is not solr format. You must re-format your XML into solr XML. you may
find examples on solr wiki or in solr examples dir.
Best Regards
Alexander Aristov
On 13 April 2012 23:13, srini softtec...@gmail.com wrote:
Erick,
Thanks for your reply. when you say Solr does not index
Thanks Again for quick reply. Little curious about the procedure you
suggested. I thought of using same procedure as you suggested. Like writing
a java program to fetch xml record from db and parse the content hand it to
Solr for indexing.
but what if my database content get changed? should I re
: I'm having some trouble wrapping my head around boosting StandardQueries.
: It looks like the function: query(subquery, default)
: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery#query is what I want, but the
: examples seem to focus on just returning a score (e.g. product of popularity
: and the
Hi,
For a web crawl+search like this you will probably need a lot of additional Big
Data crunching, so a Hadoop based solution is wise.
In addition to those products mentioned we also now have Amazon's own
CloudSearch http://aws.amazon.com/cloudsearch/ It's new, is not as cool as Solr
(not
: Basically, I need to find item X in the result set and return say N items
: before and N items after.
:
: - N items -- Item X --- N items
...
: So I might be wrong, but it looks like the only way would be to create a
: custom SolrIndexSearcher which will find the offset and
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
Given a query including a subquery, is there any way for me to learn
that subquery's contribution to the overall document score?
I can provide 'why on earth would anyone ...' if someone wants to know.
Have you
: I need to store *two big structures* in SOLR: projects and contractors.
: Contractors will search for available projects and project owners will
: search for contractors who would do it for them.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MultipleIndexes
: that *I want to have two structures*. I guess
Hello Hoss,
Here are the explain tags for two doc
str name=a0127d8e70a6d523
0.021646015 = (MATCH) sum of:
0.021646015 = (MATCH) sum of:
0.02141003 = (MATCH) max plus 0.01 times others of:
2.84194E-4 = (MATCH) weight(content:apache^0.5 in 3578), product of:
0.0029881175 =
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 6:43 PM, John Chee johnc...@mylife.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
Given a query including a subquery, is there any way for me to learn
that subquery's contribution to the overall document score?
I need this
: Given a query including a subquery, is there any way for me to learn
: that subquery's contribution to the overall document score?
You have to just execute the subquery itself ... doc collection
and score calculation doesn't keep track the subscores.
you could do this using functions in the
This all comes from a database? Here is what you want.
The DataImportHandler includes a toolkit for doing full and
incremental loading from databases.
Read this first:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/link?url=http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DIHQuickStart
Then these:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: Given a query including a subquery, is there any way for me to learn
: that subquery's contribution to the overall document score?
You have to just execute the subquery itself ... doc collection
and score
Thanks Otis.
I really appreciate the details offered here. This was very helpful
information.
I'm going to go through Solandra and Elastic Search and see if those make
sense. I was also given a suggestion to use SolrCloud on FuseDFS (that's
two recommendations for SolrCloud so far), so I will
Hi,
I want to pick different analyzers for the same field for different
languages. I can determine the language from a different field. I would have
different fieldTypes defined in my schema.xml such as text_en, text_de,
text_fr, etc where i specify which analyzer and filter to use during
Hi!
I have the following gsp code...
g:each in=${productInstanceList} status=i var=productInstance
!-- display product properties ommited --
g:remoteLink action=addaction
id=${i}
update=[success:'what-to-put-here',failure:'error']
Sorry! Wrong list!
Marcelo Carvalho Fernandes
+55 21 8272-7970
+55 21 2205-2786
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Marcelo Carvalho Fernandes
mcf2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
I have the following gsp code...
g:each in=${productInstanceList} status=i var=productInstance
!-- display
55 matches
Mail list logo
