Are you sure with LUCENE_33 (Use of BitVector)?
Am 31.05.2012 17:20, schrieb O. Klein:
> I have been struggling with this as well and found that using LUCENE_33 gives
> the best results.
>
> But as it will be deprecated this is no everlasting solution. May somebody
> knows one?
>
Add &debugQuery=true to your query and check how the home page is scored.
That should give you a clue why the title is not boosting the score enough.
Maybe you simply need a higher boost for title, but let the debugQuery
scoring be your guide.
Actually, if you are explicitly referencing a fiel
Your earlier email had this option in your spellcheck.de field type analyzer
for the StopFilterFactory:
words="german_stop_long.txt"
But your most recent email referred to "stopword.txt".
So, either add "the" to german_stop_long.txt, or change the "words" option
of your stopfilter to refer to
> spellcheck_de
>
> That should reference a field, not a field type.
Thanks for your help. But I did that, too.
Here I'll show that even the solr example webapp makes suggestions for
stopwords: I've ...
1. added "the" to the stopwords.txt
2. added "thex" to an example document (field name)
3. st
Special characters are filtered out of (most) "text" fields, but are
preserved in "string" fields. String fields might suit your needs, but are
inconvenient for keyword searching.
You may be able to use the "types" option of the WordDelimiterFilterFactory
to pass in a custom character type tab
Hi,
The challenge I'm facing is some sort of dynamic data source. Your valuable
input is highly appreciated.
Below is my data-config.xml. I have one user database and two company
databases. The user table in the user database has four columns which are id +
name + company_dbname + company_id.
Hi all
Can somebody please tell me how can I build an index in solr where one of my
field contains special characters like $ , %
I would also like to search on the same characters on that particular field.
Any advice would be appreciated.
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.4
Hi Jack,
Thanks for your help.
I delete conf/data/* every restart so make sure to work with clean data.
is there any other config I should do?. Maybe another xml file.
Kind regards
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
> It looks okay; renaming a column is fine.
>
> Maybe...
It looks okay; renaming a column is fine.
Maybe... maybe when you re-run it DIH is not replacing any documents that
already have id's in Solr, leaving them with their old field values. Maybe
you need to manually delete the old Solr documents and run a fresh full
import.
-- Jack Krupansky
--
Is it failing on the first document? I see "uid 5", suggests that it is not.
If not, how is this document different from the others?
I see the exception
org.apache.uima.resource.ResourceInitializationException, suggesting that
some file cannot be loaded.
It sounds like it may be having troubl
: I make a transformation XSLT which return :
: ---
: si les ruches d’abeilles prouvent la
: monarchie, les fourmillières, les troupes d’éléphants ou
: de castors prouvent la république.
: ---
: i put this ht
there is at least one scenario where no error is reported when it should be,
if the host runs out of disk when optimizing, it is not reported.
There is a jira issue open I think
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/possible-status-codes-from-solr-during-a-DIH-data-
Please,
Can anyone guide me through this issue? Thanks
-- Forwarded message --
From: Rafael Taboada
Date: Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:30 PM
Subject: Data Import Handler fields with different values in column and name
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Hi folks,
I'm using Solr 3.6 a
Hi,
Thats correct.
For failure, you have to check for the text *"Indexing failed. Rolled back
changes"* under the tag.
One more thing to note here is that there may be a time during the indexing
process where the indexing is complete but the index is not committed and
optimized yet.
You would nee
You've got it right. Here's a summary:
- "status" = "busy" means its in-process.
- "status" = "idle" means its finished (success or failure).
- You can drill down further by looking at sub-elements under "statusMessages" :
> if there is , it means the last import was cancelled
> with "comma
Hi All,
I have a basic doubt about index merging in Solr. The setup that I
have followed is as follows:
Setup:
I used the schema.xml that comes with the solr example. I had three cores -
core0, core1 and core2. I tried merging the indexes of core 0 and core 1
to core2. I copied the same
Try a query that uses a term that doesn't split an alphanumeric term into
two terms.
Then check to see what field type you used for the symbol and marker_symbol
fields and whether the analyzer for that field type has changed in 3.6.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Asfan
Can you add a new stored procedure that uses your current one? It
would operate like the DIH expects.
I don't remember if DB cursors are a standard part of JDBC. If they
are, it would be a great addition to the DIH if they work right.
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Niran Fajemisin wrote:
> Th
Merging indexes is not really useful- it won't make distributed search
any faster. There are features that don't work with distributed
search. Really, you are better off having shards with enough documents
so that relevance scoring is balanced.
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:04 AM, sudarshan
wrote:
>
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPerformanceFactors#mergeFactor
The defaults are very good. I have never changed them, and I've had Solr in
production at two major sites, Netflix and Chegg.
Don't spend any more time worrying about merges.
wunder
On May 31, 2012, at 10:51 AM, sudarshan wrote:
>
hello all,
i have been asked to write a small polling script (bash) to periodically
check the status of an import on our Master. our import times are small,
but there are business reasons why we want to know the status of an import
after a specified amount of time.
i need to perform certain acti
Spellcheck wants a field, not a field type. You have a spellcheck_de field
type, but you need a field as well.
spellcheck_de
That should reference a field, not a field type.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Matthias Müller
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 3:23 PM
To: solr-user
If I'm not mistaken, that's TEI, and I suggest you consult with the
TEI community for strategies for document indexing, as there are a lot
of branching-style tags in TEI. My guess is that you'll hear that it's
best to perform some sort of term expansion on the document as a
preprocessing step.
Mic
>> is it possible to configure a stopword list to the SpellCheckComponent?
> Add a stopwordfilter to your spellcheck field.
Hmm, I did. Could it be another mistake?
This is the schema definition:
This is the solrconfig:
There is no option in the Strip HTML filter to discard whitespace between
elements. And it certainly doesn't know the semantics of some XML schema for
"choice". You'll have to pre-process that semantics before Solr ingestion,
or do your own custom filter.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Messa
Jack,
Thanks for your help.
I restarted solr when I was changing schema.xml anytime.
Any doc about this mentions it is possible to map the column with another
name value. But I can't.
Thanks again.
Rafael
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
> Is there any chance that you a
Is there any chance that you added the "anotherasunto" field and then forgot
to shut down and reload Solr? Any time you edit schema.xml or solrconfig.xml
you need to reload Solr for the changes to take effect.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Rafael Taboada
Sent: Thursday,
Hi All,
I'm new to Solr. I saw this post relating to Merging of indexes. I
have a similar doubt. From the post, I understand that merging of indexes
across different cores is possible only if the cores exist o a single
machine. I want to merge indexes of different machines. Can you pleas
Walter,
Thanks again. Can you specify the criteria based on which Solr
optimizes/force merges segments automatically. Is this defined by the
MergeFactor parameter - like if the mergefactor is 10, then merge happens
for every 10 segments? Please explain.
Thanks,
Sudarshan
--
View this
Add a stopwordfilter to your spellcheck field.
-Original message-
> From:Matthias Müller
> Sent: Thu 31-May-2012 18:39
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Stop Words in SpellCheckComponent
>
> Hi,
>
> is it possible to configure a stopword list to the SpellCheckComponent?
>
>
Further observation on the error:
All requests to add documents through the /update URL land up with the same
error, irrespective of the fields contained in the document. If I don't use
the UIMAUpdateRequestProcessor, I can add/update documents successfully.
Here are the snippets relevant to upda
Thanks for your response, Michael. Unfortunately changing the stored procedure
is not really an option here.
From what I'm seeing, it would appear that there's really no way of somehow
instructing the Data Import Handler to get a handle on the output parameter
from the stored procedure. It's a
Hi folks,
I'm using Solr 3.6 and I'm trying to import data from my database to solr
using Data Import Handler. My db-config is like this:
My problem is when I'm trying to use a different values in the field tag,
for example
Wh
Hello,
I have an index full text on xml files.
Exemple:
---
si les ruches d’abeilles
> prouvent la
> monarchie, les fourmillières, les troupes d
Hi Tommaso,
I have followed the steps you have listed to try to deploy the example
RoomNumberAnnotator with Solr 3.5.
Here is the error trace that I get:
org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: processing error: null. uid=5,
text="Test Room HAW GN-K35..."
at
org.apache.solr.uima.processor
Hi,
is it possible to configure a stopword list to the SpellCheckComponent?
For example:
When searching for "the indexs" "the" is filtered, because it is a stopword.
The SpellCheckComponent gives me a false suggestion for "the".
But the SpellCheckComponent should only give a suggestion for "index
Hello,
I am having problems doing highlighting a Solr 3.6 instance, while it
was working just fine before on our 1.4 instance.
The solrconfig.xml and schema.xml files are located here:
https://github.com/mpi2/mpi2_solr/blob/master/multicore/main/conf/schema.xml
(please note the incorrect lin
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Markus Jelsma
wrote:
> We simply declare the following in our fieldType:
>
>
Thats not enough, see the example:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/trunk/solr/core/src/test-files/solr/conf/schema-sim.xml
--
lucidimagination.com
Hi,
We intend to use different similarity implemenations for some field types
configured according to SOLR-2338. I doubled checked with the schema in
test-files and everything seems fine. However, the result is not correct and
debugQuery shows the default configured similarity implementation is
I have been struggling with this as well and found that using LUCENE_33 gives
the best results.
But as it will be deprecated this is no everlasting solution. May somebody
knows one?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Multi-words-synonyms-matching-tp3898950p398704
Hello, guys.
Now it's working. Thank you both Jack and Sami.
I fixed my issue by just using server.query(query, METHOD.POST) in solrJ and
yes, I was using HttpSolrServer. I have to move on to CommonsHttpSolrServer.
Thank you very much.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.na
I could be wrong about this, but Oracle has a table() function that I
believe turns the output of a function as a table. So possibly you
could wrap your procedure in a function that returns the cursor, or
convert the procedure to a function.
Michael Della Bitta
---
Thanks James, that works nicely!
-Original message-
> From:Dyer, James
> Sent: Thu 31-May-2012 16:05
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: spellcheck collate with fq parameters SOLR-2010
>
> Markus,
>
> When you set "spellcheck.maxCollationTries" to a value greater than ze
Markus,
When you set "spellcheck.maxCollationTries" to a value greater than zero, the
spellchecker will query each collation candidate to determine how many hits it
would return. If the collation will not yield any hits, it throws it away then
tries some more (up to whatever value you set). Y
I've also tried a lot of tricks to get xpointer working with multiple child
elements, to no success.
In the end, I've resorted to a less pretty, other-way-around solution. I do
something like this:
solrconfig_common.xml -> no xml declaration, no root tag, no nothing
...
For each file that I need
> I need something like http://cl.ly/2o2E0g0S422d2p1X203h . See how TCMB
> was stressed?
Hi Tolga,
I think, you can easily learn the basic using one of the following books.
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/books.html
The Solr example. As in the Solr tutorial.
See:
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/api/doc-files/tutorial.html
Index books.json from exampledocs and then enter a /browse request in your
web browser. Add the "&wt=xml" query parameter so that you can see the raw
XML response that shows the "highlight
Hi,
It seems it doesn't work or i cannot get it to work. I've tried both the
IndexSpellchecker in Solr 3.2 and the DirectSpellchecker of trunk. The
correctly spelled flag is correct when considering the fq parameters but the
collation is never when using a filter. I've also tried
spellcheck.ma
You mean http:///www.example.com:8983/solr/browse? It says "unknown
field 'cat'"
On 5/31/12 4:16 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
Yes, that is what highlighting does - it extracts an excerpt and
highlights search terms. You said you have highlighting working, so
what else is it that you need?
Try "
Yes, that is what highlighting does - it extracts an excerpt and highlights
search terms. You said you have highlighting working, so what else is it
that you need?
Try "/browse" in the Solr example. It does exactly what your example shows.
So, what else is it that you are trying to do? Or if s
I'm just wondering what the general consensus is on indexing XML data to Solr
in terms of parsing and mining the relevant data out of the file and putting
them into Solr fields. Assume that this is the XML file and resulting Solr
fields:
XML data:
foo
garbage data
Solr Fields:
Id=1234
Title
I need something like http://cl.ly/2o2E0g0S422d2p1X203h . See how TCMB
was stressed?
On 5/31/12 3:54 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
Since highlighting, by definition, does highlight terms in "excerpts"
(snippets or fragments from a text field), what else is it that you need?
-- Jack Krupansky
---
Since highlighting, by definition, does highlight terms in "excerpts"
(snippets or fragments from a text field), what else is it that you need?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Tolga
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 4:55 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Hightlighting
Hi Wenca,
I'm a bit late. but maybe you're still interested.
There's no such functionality in standard Solr. With sorting, this is
not possible, because sort functions only rank each single document,
they know nothing about the position of the others. And query elevation
is similar, you'll ra
Hi all,
I've seen a few questions asked around invoking stored procedures from within
Data Import Handler but none of them seem to indicate what type of output
parameters were being used.
I have a stored procedure created in Oracle database that takes a couple input
parameters and has an outpu
Hi,
responses please
-- Jamel E
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/difference-between-Katta-and-SolrCloud-replicator-factor-tp3986791p3986998.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thanks for all the responses. I went with the UpdateRequestProcessor and it
works.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Lance Norskog [mailto:goks...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Samstag, 26. Mai 2012 01:53
An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Creating custom Filter / Tokenizer / Request Hand
Hi,
Two separate things asked in one thread...
I am crawling my websites with nutch. When I index them, I'd like to be
able to highlight my keyword and display en excerpt containing that
keyword. I found a solution with highlight, but what can I about excerpt?
Thanks and regards,
Hi Otis,
done :) Till now we use Graphite, Ganglia and Zabbix. For our JVM
monitoring JStatsD.
Best regards
Vadim
2012/5/31 Otis Gospodnetic :
> Hi,
>
> Super quick poll: What do you use for Solr performance monitoring?
> Vote here:
> http://blog.sematext.com/2012/05/30/poll-what-do-you-use-for
ok, thanks a lot for the answer.
Elisabeth
2012/5/31 Chris Hostetter
>
> : When I read fieldValueCache statistics I have something that looks like
> :
> : item_ABC_FACET :
> :
> {field=ABC_FACET,memSize=4224,tindexSize=32,time=92,phase1=92,nTerms=0,bigTerms=0,termInstances=0,uses=11}
> :
> :
>
60 matches
Mail list logo
