hello,
plz clarify documents means unique id's or something else
lets say i have file indexed each file no. is unique so file count will b
2.14 billions
assume i have content in database as records each record have unique id so
record count will be 2.14 billions
m i right?
--
Thanks
Ok. Do you know when and where Lucene Eurocon 2012 gonna happen?
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Mikhail Khludnev
mkhlud...@griddynamics.com wrote:
up
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
Tech Lead
Grid Dynamics
http://www.griddynamics.com
mkhlud...@griddynamics.com
--
Hi,
One index records is one documents along with one unique id. like in
database one rows is one document is solr.
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Sachin Aggarwal
different.sac...@gmail.com wrote:
hello,
plz clarify documents means unique id's or something else
lets say i have file
thanks ..
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 11:51 AM, irshad siddiqui irshad.s...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
One index records is one documents along with one unique id. like in
database one rows is one document is solr.
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Sachin Aggarwal
different.sac...@gmail.com
Can anyone help?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-with-Tomcat-on-VPS-tp3990397p3990677.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
You have to check installation configuration.
Inside tomcat webapps folder you have putted solr.war file. and within
this WEB-INF folder web.xml you have to check your solr core folder url
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:34 PM, mcfly04 hil...@csc-scc.gc.ca wrote:
Can anyone help?
--
Thank you for your response.
Are you referring to the SolrRequestFilter path-prefix?
Here is a copy of my web.xml:
-
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
!DOCTYPE web-app PUBLIC quot;-//Sun Microsystems, Inc.//DTD Web
Application 2.3//ENquot;
quot;http://java.sun.com/dtd/web-app_2_3.dtdquot;
HI,
in this web.xml file you need to add below line
env-entry
env-entry-namesolr/home/env-entry-name
env-entry-valueyour solr core path here /env-entry-value
env-entry-typejava.lang.String/env-entry-type
/env-entry
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 4:24 PM, mcfly04
Hi,
you can also refer below url for solr configuration
http://tek-manthan.blogspot.in/
Regards,
Irshad
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 4:24 PM, mcfly04 hil...@csc-scc.gc.ca wrote:
Thank you for your response.
Are you referring to the SolrRequestFilter path-prefix?
Here is a copy of my web.xml:
Ah, OK, I misunderstood. OK, here's a couple of off-the-top-of-my-head
ideas.
make a backup of your index before anything else G...
Split up your current index into two parts by segments. That is, copy the whole
directory to another place, and remove some of the segments from each. I.e.
when
i need to import data from sql server and cassandra
first, get user ids from sql server
then get one user's characters from cassandra by user id
last, save the users characters doc into solr
one user have multi charcters
and i need to save the doc like
1040.txt
row uniqueid=10031016578048
Thanks for clarifying!
I have the solr/home configured in the server.xml of Tomcat. When I had not
set it properly there were errors in the log. It is configured correctly
now as no errors are in the log regarding sorl/home.
The issue is that I cannot access any of the Servlets. I can access
Hi
Messing with behaviour when Solr looses its ZooKeeper connection I'm
trying to reproduce how a replica slice gets leader. I have made the
below unit test in the LeaderElectionTest class which fails.
I don't know if this simulates how Solr uses the LeaderElection class
but please comment on
H. I think you would have a _far_ easier time of this just getting
all the source code, modifying the relevant source, and then just
issuing an ant dist (or ant example if you wanted to try it). There are
other targets that will package up the whole thing just like you would get
it from the
Hi,
We are running exactly same solr version and have these issues relatively
frequently. The main cause in our case has usually been the out of memory
exceptions, as some of our shards are pretty fat. Allocating more RAM
usually helps for a while. The lock file needs to be manually removed
ok tested it myself and a slave runnning embedded works, just not within
my application -- yet...
On 20.06.2012 18:14, tom wrote:
hi,
i was just wondering if i need to do smth special if i want to have an
embedded slave to get replication working ?
my setup is like so:
- in my clustered
No, that's 255 bytes/record. Also, any time you store a field, the
raw data is preserved in the *.fdt and *.fdx files. If you're thinking
about RAM requirements, you must subtract the amount of data
in those files from the total, as a start. This might help:
hi,
i'm using the suggester with a file like so:
searchComponent class=solr.SpellCheckComponent name=suggest
lst name=spellchecker
str name=namesuggest/str
str
name=classnameorg.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.Suggester/str
str
BTW: a core unload doesnt release the lock either ;(
On 21.06.2012 14:39, tom wrote:
hi,
i'm using the suggester with a file like so:
searchComponent class=solr.SpellCheckComponent name=suggest
lst name=spellchecker
str name=namesuggest/str
str
pocking into the code i think the FileDictionary class is the culprit:
It takes an InputStream as a ctor argument but never releases the
stream. what puzzles me is that the class seems to allow a one-time
iteration and then the stream is useless, unless i'm missing smth. here.
is there a good
I don't think autocommit is deprecated, it's just commented out of the config
and using commitWithin (assuming you're working from SolrJ) is preferred if
possible.
But what governs a particular set of docs? What are the criteria
that determine when
you want to commit? Flushes and commits are
Hi all,
We're thinking of moving forward with Solr 4.0 and we plan to have a master
index server and at least two slaves servers. The Master server will be used
primarily for indexing and the queries will be load balanced across to the
replicated slave servers. I would like to know if, with
Erick, much thanks for detailing these options. I am currently trying the
second one as that seems a little easier and quicker to me.
I successfully deleted documents with IDs after the problem time that I do
know to an accuracy of a couple hours. Now, the stats are:
numDocs : 2132454075
Does it work in the non distributed case?
Is the field you're grouping on stored? What is the type on the uniqueKey
field? Is it stored and indexed?
I've had a problem with distributed not working when the uniqueKey field was
indexed but not stored.
Also, in distributed searches, the
Cody,
Does it work in the non distributed case?
Yes.
Is the field you're grouping on stored? What is the type on the
uniqueKey
field? Is it stored and indexed?
The field I'm grouping on is a string, stored and indexed. The unique key
field is a string, stored and indexed.
I've had a
No, I believe it was a different exception, just brainstorming. (it was a null
reference iirc)
Does a *:* query with no sorting work?
Cody
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Loofbourrow [mailto:bloofbour...@knowledgemosaic.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 10:33 AM
To:
Right, if you optimize, at the end maxDocs should == numDocs.
Usually the document reclamation stuff is done when segments
merge, but that won't happen in this case since this index is
becoming static, so a manual optimize is probably indicated.
Something like this should also work, either way:
Does a *:* query with no sorting work?
Well, this is interesting. Leaving q= as it was, but removing the sort,
makes the whole thing work.
And if you were thinking of asking whether the sort field is a date, the
answer is yes, it's an indexed and stored DateField. It's also on the list
of
28 matches
Mail list logo
