Hi,
because your search for /?q=produto_nome:lubrificante intimo is
a phrase search and will be handled different.
Your other search gets the synonyms, but the last synonym is a multi-word
synonym
and not a phrase
... produto_nome:lubrificante intimo) ))
See also:
Hi Yonik,
I've been attempting to fix the SUBREADER insanity in our custom
component, and have made perhaps some progress (or is this worse?) -
I've gone from SUBREADER to VALUEMISMATCH insanity:
---snip---
entries_count : 12
entry#0 :
I'm also using that field for a facet:
|requestHandler name=mytype class=solr.SearchHandler
lst name=defaults
str name=defTypedismax/str
str name=echoParamsexplicit/str
float name=tie1/float
str name=qf
many field but not store_slug
/str
Cheers, saved the day
Lee C
On 28 September 2012 23:27, Chris Hostetter hossman_luc...@fucit.orgwrote:
: The issue we face is the f5 balancer is returning a cookie which the
client
: is hanging onto. resulting in the same slave being hit for all requests.
...
: My question is can
The problem is your stray double quote:
str name=queryAnalyzerFieldTypetext_general_fr/str
I'd think this would throw an exception somewhere.
-Original message-
From:Jose Aguilar jagui...@searchtechnologies.com
Sent: Tue 02-Oct-2012 01:40
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject:
Hi Billy
see
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrSecurity
One approach is keep master internal, read only slaves with just select
handlers defined in the solr config for public facing requests.
See your app container security docs for other approaches
On 1 October 2012 16:32, Billy Newman
Gustav,
AFAIK, multi words synonyms is one of the weak points for Lucene/Solr. I'm
going to propose a solution approach at forthcoming Eurocon
http://www.apachecon.eu/schedule/presentation/18/ . You are welcome!
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
Tech Lead
Grid Dynamics
Hi,
I'm using Solr 3.6.1 in an application embedded directly, i.e. via
EmbeddedSolrServer, not over an HTTP connection, which works
perfectly. Our application uses Thread.interrupt() for canceling
long-running tasks (e.g. through Future.cancel). A while (and a few
Solr versions) back a colleague
Hello list,
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Iwan Hanjoyo ihanj...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
I used older Solr 3.6.1 version.
I created a new web project (called SolrRedo) on Netbeans 7.1.1 running on
Glassfish Web Server
Then I moved sources from the solr.war sample code (that resided
Hello list,
I finally solved the problem. I miss the configuration of solr jar file in
the solrconfig.xml file.
thank you.
Kind regards,
Hanjoyo
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Iwan Hanjoyo ihanj...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello list,
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Iwan Hanjoyo
Hello list,
I finally solved the problem. I miss the configuration of solr jar files in
the solrconfig.xml file.
thank you.
Kind regards,
Hanjoyo
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Iwan Hanjoyo ihanj...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
First, after extracting apache-solr-3.6.1.zip file, I can run
Hi
I have been profiling SolrCloud when indexing into a sharded non-replica
collection because indexing slows down when the index files (*.fdt)
grows to a couple of GB (the largest is about 3.5GB).
When profiling for a couple of minutes I see that most time is spend in
the
Hi,
I try to map values from one field into other values in another field.
For example:
original_field: orig_value1
mapped_field: mapped_value1
with the help of an explicitely defined (N:1) mapping:
orig_value1 = mapped_value1
orig_value2 = mapped_value1
orig_value3 = mapped_value2
I have
What's the query you send? I'm guessing a bit here since you
haven't included it, but try insuring two things:
1 your mapped_field is has 'stored=true '
2 you specify (either in your request handler on on the URL) fl=mapped_value
Best
Erick
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 9:04 AM, tech.vronk
the query is:
mapped_field:mapped_value1
and seems to correctly return the documents.
the mapped_field has attribute stored=true
and also appears in the result (even without requesting it explicitely
with fl),
just with the orig_value1 instead of mapped_value1
matej
Am 02.10.2012 15:46,
Thanks for this guys, really excellent explanation!
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidworks.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
2) the coordinator node sums up the counts for any constraint returned by
multiple
So does mincount get considered in this as well?
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Jamie Johnson jej2...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for this guys, really excellent explanation!
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidworks.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Chris
Ah, I get it (finally). OK, there's no good way to do what
you want that I know of. The problem is that the
stored=true takes effect long before any transformations
are applied, and is always the raw input. You effectively
want to chain the fields together, i.e. apply the analysis
chain _then_
Hi :)
I'm using Solr 3.6.1 and i'm trying to use the similarity features of
lucene/solr to compare texts.
The content of my documents is in french so I defined a field like :
field name=content_mlt type=text_fr termVectors=true
indexed=true stored=true/
(it uses the default text_fr
Hi all,
I'm trying to import some hierarchical data (stored in MySQL) on Solr,
using DataImportHandler.
Unfortunately, as most of you already knows, MySQL has no support for
recursive queries, so there is no way to get hierarchical data stored
as an adjacency list.
So I considered writing a DIH
Hi Toke,
We encountered this issue again. This time the SOLR servers were stalled. We
are at 30 TPS.
Please let us know any updates in the HTTP issue.
Thanks,
Balaji
Balaji Gandhi, Senior Software Developer, Horizontal Platform Services
Product Engineering │ Apollo Group, Inc.
1225 W.
Hi Maurizio,
if you can manipulate your MySql db a simpler solution can be the following:
1 - Add a new field for your hierarchical data inside your table
MY_HIERARCHICAL_FIELD
2 - Populate directly in MySql this new field with a simple procedure*
3 - Import the data in your Solr index
*The
: I'm also using that field for a facet:
Hmmm... that still doesn't make sense. faceting can use FieldCache, but
it will check if ht field is mutivalued to decide if/when/how to do this.
There's nothing else in your requestHandler config that would suggest why
you might get this error.
can
Ciao Davide,
Unfortunately changing the structure of the dbs is not an option for
me (there are many legacy dbs involved), otherwise I would have chosen
a /closure table/ instead of the /path enumeration/ you mentioned
before.
Furthermore, I'd need 2 PE fields: 1 for the values (ids) and 1 for
I remember a bug in EmbeddedSolrServer at 1.4.1 when exception bypasses
request closing that lead to searcher leak and OOM. It was fixed about two
years ago.
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Robert Krüger krue...@lesspain.de wrote:
Hi,
I'm using Solr 3.6.1 in an application embedded directly,
The user query design your ownbinoculars is corrected by the
'wordbreak' dictionary to:
str name=querystringdesign your (own binoculars)/str
Where are the parentheses coming from? Can I strip them with a
post-processing filter? The parentheses make the terms optional, so,
while the
Hi esteban. Im currently using both in my application. Both are fine.
Solarium is great because it models the concepts of solr and can build
queries using OOP. The other one is more lower level, so u have to write
queries manually, which can be good in some situations. Both are fast
enough.
The parenthesis are being added by the spellchecker. I tried to envision a
number of different scenarios when designing how this would work and at the
time it seemed best to add parenthesis around terms that originally were
together but now are split up. From your example, I see this is a
Hey I am trying to make a simple application using solrj to index documents.
I used the start.jar to start the Solr,. When I try to index a document to
Solr
I get the following exception:
Exception in thread main java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
org/apache/http/NoHttpResponseException
The
If it is a simple text file, does that text file start with the UTF-16 BOM
marker?
http://unicode.org/faq/utf_bom.html
Also, do UTF-8 files work? If not, then your setup has a basic encoding problem.
And, when you post such a text file (for example, with curl), use the UTF-16
charset mime-type:
Hi,
Is there any complete implementation for Solr 4.0 Beta of a class which
uses
ContentStreamUpdateRequest to send data to the
ExtractingRequestHandlerhttp://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtractingRequestHandler
,
similar to this one for 3.1 version?
Thank you for your help, the whole team overlooked this simple error. It
was driving us crazy! :)
Thanks!!
Jose.
On 10/2/12 1:23 AM, Markus Jelsma markus.jel...@openindex.io wrote:
The problem is your stray double quote:
str name=queryAnalyzerFieldTypetext_general_fr/str
I'd think this would
Solr can index bytearrays too: unigram, bigram, trigram... even bitsets,
tritsets, qatrisets ;- )
LOL I got strong cold...
BTW, don't forget to configure UTF-8 as your default (Java) container
encoding...
-Fuad
Was it stalled due to gc pause?
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 2, 2012, at 10:02 AM, balaji.gandhi balaji.gan...@apollogrp.edu
wrote:
Hi Toke,
We encountered this issue again. This time the SOLR servers were stalled. We
are at 30 TPS.
Please let us know any updates in the HTTP issue.
I don't have the URL handy, but guys at LinkedIn have a benchmark tool for
Solr, ElasticSearch, and Sensei. Check the list archives for URL and my
signature below for a tool that can show metrics for any of those systems,
which you'll probably want to observe during testing.
Otis
--
Performance
Are the cores join-able? If so, you can use Solr's join feature to execute
just one query.
Otis
--
Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm
On Oct 2, 2012 5:50 PM, Nicholas Ding nicholas...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm working on a search project, that involves searching against more
You need to add the jar with that missing class to the startup command line.
Otis
--
Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm
On Oct 2, 2012 5:42 PM, Rui Vaz rui@gmail.com wrote:
Hey I am trying to make a simple application using solrj to index
documents.
I used the start.jar to
Join is cool, but does it work among multiple cores? On Solr's wiki, I saw
it's only applied to single core.
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Otis Gospodnetic
otis.gospodne...@gmail.com wrote:
Are the cores join-able? If so, you can use Solr's join feature to execute
just one query.
Otis
Hi Billy,
There is nothing in Solr that will do XML parsing and link extraction,
so you'll need to do that part. Once you do that have a look at Solr
join for parent-child querying.
http://search-lucene.com/?q=solr+join
Otis
--
Search Analytics - http://sematext.com/search-analytics/index.html
Solr join does work across multiple cores, as long as they are in the same JVM.
Otis
--
Search Analytics - http://sematext.com/search-analytics/index.html
Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm/index.html
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Nicholas Ding nicholas...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for your response Damien.
As you said, you can do some basic things quiclier than solr-php-client. I
think is a good choice for basic applications, and if needed more specific
things, then go with solr-php-client also.
2012/10/2 Damien Camilleri i...@webdistribution.com.au
Hi
Thanks Otis
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Otis Gospodnetic otis.gospodne...@gmail.com
wrote:
I don't have the URL handy, but guys at LinkedIn have a benchmark tool for
Solr, ElasticSearch, and Sensei. Check the list archives for URL and my
signature below for a tool that can show metrics
Otis, I am looking for performance benchmark number rather than performance
monitoring tools. SPM looks like monitoring tool. Moreover its comparing
Solr with Elastic Search etc, I want comparison between Solr 3.6 and
solrcloud.
Thanks
Varun
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 9:15 PM, varun srivastava
Hi,
Was trying to say you will need to run the benchmark yourself because each
context is different. The linkedin tool I referred you to will help you do
that - you don't have to bench non-solr engines.
I also tried suggesting that while you are benchmarking you really want to
be looking at
44 matches
Mail list logo
