you should check not suggestions, but collations in the response xml
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Issue-with-spellcheck-and-autosuggest-tp4036208p4036977.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Klein,
Thank you for ur reply..
i hosted the application in apache2 server
and able to access the link http://localhost/search/
but while accessing http://localhost/crawler/login.php
its showing the error msg as
Access denied for user 'crawler'@'localhost' (using
Hi,
i resolved the issue Access denied for user 'crawler'@'localhost' (using
password: YES)
mysql user crawler/crawler was created and privileges added as mentioned in
the tutorial..
Thank you.
--
View this message in context:
i don't have experience with this but it looks like you could use, from DIH:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#LineEntityProcessor
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 10:23 AM, hadyelsahar hadyelsa...@gmail.com wrote:
i have a large Arabic Text File that contains Tweets each line contains one
Hi,
I'm wondering if there exists or if someone has implemented something like
the following as a function query:
overlap(query,field) = number of matching terms in field/number of terms in
field
e.g. with three docs having these tokens(e.g.A B C) in a field
D
1:A B B
2:A B
3:A
The overlap
I tried Solr 4.1, reindexed data using DIH (full-import) and compared
response time with version 4.0. Response time increased 1.5-2 times. How to
disable compression on stored fields in Solr 4.1? I tried to change codec
version in solrconfig:
luceneMatchVersionLUCENE_40/luceneMatchVersion
and
No, not at all. Presence or not of term vectors won't impact replication
in that way.
For SolrCloud, it is up to each node to create term vectors when it
receives a document for indexing. Using 3.x style replication, the slave
will pull all changed files making up changed segments on replication,
I guess, I have to write a new codec that uses a stored fields format which
does not compress stored fields such as Lucene40StoredFieldsFormat
http://blog.jpountz.net/post/35667727458/stored-fields-compression-in-lucene-4-1
What is the purpose of luceneMatchVersion tag then, does it affect
Hi,
We thought we'd sorted this out but it's come back again.
We're on 4.0GA which I forgot to mention before. We disabled polling on the
slaves and have a PHP script that gets the current version number of the
master, fires a reindex (optimize,clean) and then loops on a sleep(120)
function at
Yes, I guess, full index replication is a general bug of 4.x. I tried the
same routine with termVectors and got the same result:
1. stopped all Solr instances
2. cleared data folders of all instances
3. ran master, made full-import with optimize option using DIH
4. after import ran slave and did
If your metadata requirements aren't too heavy, you could store all
the title, author, etc. info in Solr along with the index of the full
text of the document. Then when you submitted a query to Solr, you
could retrieve back the list of information you'd need to display a
page of search results,
Hi,
We are trying to use solr for a text based search solution in a web
application. The documents that are getting indexed are essentially text
based files like *.txt, *.pdf, etc. We are using the Tika extraction plugin
to extract the text content from the files and storing it using a
Hi,
We are trying to use solr for a text based search solution in a web
application. The documents that are getting indexed are essentially text
based files like *.txt, *.pdf, etc. We are using the Tika extraction plugin
to extract the text content from the files and storing it using a
The number of hits of a term in a Solr document impacts the score, but
still only counts as one hit in the numFound count. Solr doesn't track
hits for individual term occurrences, except that you could check the
term frequency of a specific term in a specific document if you wanted,
using a
Thanks Jack for the explanation.
But lets say if my requirement needs me to return all occurrences of the
search term along with the text snippet around them for each document under
the search scope, how do we go about achieving that with Solr?
Thanks Regards,
Soumya.
-Original
On 1/29/2013 4:57 AM, Artyom wrote:
I guess, I have to write a new codec that uses a stored fields format which
does not compress stored fields such as Lucene40StoredFieldsFormat
http://blog.jpountz.net/post/35667727458/stored-fields-compression-in-lucene-4-1
What is the purpose of
I don't know if there is a highlighter option to highlight all hits in a
document, as opposed to the snippet for the first. If not, you could right
your own highlighter search component to do that. But it may be possible to
use pieces of code that are already there.
-- Jack Krupansky
On 1/29/2013 7:40 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
I don't think there's a way to turn off the stored field compression in
the 4.1 index format, but I think there is something else you can do
right now - switch to the 4.0 index format. To do this, you need a
postingsFormat value of Lucene40 on some or
Looks like a bug to me.
Actually, when I try it with the Solr 4.0 example, I get:
str name=rawquerystringO*t*v*h/str
str name=querystringO*t*v*h/str
str name=parsedquery(+DisjunctionMaxQuery((sku:otvh)))/no_coord/str
str name=parsedquery_toString+(sku:otvh)/str
For:
curl
Now this must be said, thanks for solr 4.1 (and lucene 4.1)!
Great improvements compared to 4.0.
After building the first 4.1 index I thought the index was broken, but had no
error messages anywhere.
Why I thought it was damaged?
The index size went down from 167 GB (solr 4.0) to 115 GB (solr
Subscribed! Just integrating solr 4.1 in a corporate GIS architecture as we
speak.
Thanks!
Guilherme Pires
-Original Message-
From: Bernd Fehling [mailto:bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de]
Sent: terça-feira, 29 de Janeiro de 2013 15:34
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: thanks for
Hi,
I am new to Solr, and I am using the DataImportHandler to Query a SQL
Server and populate Solr. I specify the SQL Query in the db-data-config.xml
file. Each SQL Query seems to be associated with an entity. Is it possible
to have a query per field? I think it would be easier to explain
On 29 January 2013 22:42, O. Olson olson_...@yahoo.it wrote:
[...]
SQL Database Schema:
Table: Prod_Table
Column 1: SKU - ID/Primary Key
Column 2: Title
Table: Cat_Table
Column 1: SKU - Foreign Key
Column 2: CategoryLevel
Column 3: CategoryName
Where CategoryLevel is 1, I would like
Gora Mohanty-3 wrote
On 29 January 2013 22:42, O. Olson lt;
olson_ord@
gt; wrote:
[...]
SQL Database Schema:
Table: Prod_Table
Column 1: SKU - ID/Primary Key
Column 2: Title
Table: Cat_Table
Column 1: SKU - Foreign Key
Column 2: CategoryLevel
Column 3: CategoryName
Where
On 29 January 2013 23:34, O. Olson olson_...@yahoo.it wrote:
[...]
Thank you. Good call Gora, I forgot to mention about the query. I am trying
to query something like the following in the URL for the Example:
http://localhost:8983/solr/db/select
?q=queryfacet=truefacet.field=Category1
I
The wiki is open to everyone. If you do edit it, please try to keep it
organized.
On 1/24/13 9:41 AM, Viacheslav Davidovich
viacheslav.davidov...@objectstyle.com wrote:
Hi David,
thank you for your answer.
After update to this field type and change the SOLR query I receive
required
Hi Jaspreet.
Your post is confusing. You're using spatial, so you say, yet your
question suggests you have yet to use it. If your documents are
associated with a city, then you should index the lat-lon location of that
city in your documents. It's denormalized like this.
~ David
On 1/23/13
Daniel,
You can start from here
http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_0_0-BETA/core/org/apache/lucene/search/similarities/Similarity.html#coord%28int,%20int%29but
it requires deep understanding of Lucene internals
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Daniel Rosher rosh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm
Hi Erick,
Thanks, I have read the blogs you cited and I found them very interesting, and
we have tuned the jvm accordingly but still we get the odd longish gc pause.
That said we perhaps have an unusual setup; we index a lot of small documents
using servers with ssd's and 128 GB RAM in a
Hi O.O
1. Yes faceting on field function_s would return all the facet values in the
search results with their counts.
2. You would probably have to join the names together with a special character
and then split them later in the UI.
3. I'm sure there is a way to query the index for all
Is there a way to pass in password and user to datasource in db-config
xml file? Thanks.
Hi solr users,
My queryResultCache hitratio has been trending down lately and is now at 0.01%,
and also it's warmup time was almost a minute. I have lowered the autowarm
count dramatically since there are no hits anyway. I also wanted to lower my
autowarm counts across the board because I am
In the process of upgrading to 4.1 from 3.6, I've noticed that our
master servers do not show any commit points available until after a
new commit happens. So, for static indexes, replication doesn't happen
and for dynamic indexes, we have to wait until an incremental update
of master for slaves
On 30 January 2013 01:52, Lapera-Valenzuela, Elizabeth [Primerica]
elizabeth.lap...@primerica.com wrote:
Is there a way to pass in password and user to datasource in db-config
xml file? Thanks.
Do you mean something beyond what is covered in the Solr
DIH Wiki page:
On Jan 29, 2013, at 3:50 PM, Gregg Donovan gregg...@gmail.com wrote:
should we
just try uncommenting that line in ReplicationHandler?
Please try. I'd file a JIRA issue in any case. I can probably take a closer
look.
- Mark
Hi Alex,
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
arafa...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Eduard Moraru enygma2...@gmail.com
wrote:
The only small but workable problem I have now is the same as
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3598. When you are
Our application of Solr is somehow non-typical. We constantly feed Solr
with lots of documents grabbed from internet, and NRT searching is not
required. A typical search will return millions of result, and query
response need to be as fast as possible.
Since in SolrCloud environment, indexing
Gora Mohanty-3 wrote
Yes, things should function as you describe, and no you should not
need any change in your schema from changing the DIH configuration
file. Please take a look at
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrFacetingOverview#Facet_Indexing for
how best to define faceting fields. Also,
If you're lucky, the file has a format suitable for the CSV update handler
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateCSV
Note that if your file does not containt unique ID, you can generate those
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UniqueKey
You can then use CURL or http://wiki.apache.org/solr/post.jar to index
And I have just confirmed that this is indeed the case (unless I lost my
mind).
This must be causing great confusing to anybody trying to piece together
examples from multiple places in DIH wiki and getting completely confused.
The example I had just now was:
1) I had this in
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Eduard Moraru enygma2...@gmail.com wrote:
Now, what worries me a bit is the fact that I have a copyField set up from
title_* to title_ml to do what I have mentioned above.
copyField is not recursive, nor chained. Even if some people wished it was
(chained).
Thank you Robi for the information. I will be looking into this esp. the
implementation. Having to join the names together and then split them later
is something I have to discuss with my team.
O. O.
Petersen, Robert wrote
Hi O.O
1. Yes faceting on field function_s would return all the
On 1/29/2013 1:36 PM, Petersen, Robert wrote:
My queryResultCache hitratio has been trending down lately and is now at 0.01%,
and also it's warmup time was almost a minute. I have lowered the autowarm
count dramatically since there are no hits anyway. I also wanted to lower my
autowarm
One other thing that some auto-warming of the query result cache can
achieve is loading FieldCache entries for sorting / function queries
so real user queries don't experience increased latency. If you
remove all auto-warming of the query result cache, you may want to add
static warming entries
Thanks, Mark -- that fixed the issue for us. I created
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4380 to track it.
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 29, 2013, at 3:50 PM, Gregg Donovan gregg...@gmail.com wrote:
should we
just try uncommenting
Thanks Yonik,
I'm cooking up some static warming queries right now, based upon our commonly
issued queries. I've already been noticing occasional long running queries.
Our web farm times out a search after twenty seconds and issues an exception.
I see a few of these every day and am trying
Hi Shawn,
Since my solr services power product search for a large retail web site with
over fourteen million unique products, so I'm suspecting the main reason for
the low hit rate is many unique user queries. We're expanding our product
count and product type categories every day as fast as
An experiment found that stop all shards, remove the zoo_data (assume your
zookeeper is used for this particular solrcloud, otherwise, be cautious),
and then start instance by order works fine.
Ming
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 5:31 AM, Per Steffensen st...@designware.dk wrote:
Hi
We have
Looks like a bug to me.
Thanks Jack for the reply. I created SOLR-4382 for this.
Just one suggestion, instead of stopping zk and removing zoo_data,
better to use Solr's zkcli.sh script from cloud-scripts to clear out
data, e.g.
zkcli.sh -zkhost localhost:9983 -cmd clear /solr
The paths I clear when I want a full clean-up are:
/configs/CONFIG_NAME
I'm just writing to close the loop on this issue.
I moved my servlet to a beefier server with lots of RAM. I also cleaned up
the data to make the index somewhat smaller. And, I turned off all the
caches since my application doesn't benefit very much from caching. My
application is now quite
Following up from a post I made back in 2011...
I am a user of Solr 3.2 and I make use of the distributed search capabilities
of Solr using
a fairly simple architecture of a coordinator + some shards.
Correct me if I am wrong: In a standard distributed search with
QueryComponent, the
52 matches
Mail list logo
