In the admin page you can monitor the cache parameters, like eviction. If
you cache evicts too much, you can increase its capacity. NOTE: this will
affect on RAM consumption, so you would need to change the tomcat config
too.
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Montu v Boda wrote:
> Hi
>
> current
On Tue, 2013-04-16 at 12:22 +0200, Montu v Boda wrote:
> we have 506 document is index in solr and it's size is 400GB.
>
> now when We search for keyword "test" it will take 1 min to give the
> response for 1 rows.
At this point, you have searched for other keywords before you measure
on
Hi,
I got everything in place, my polygons are indexing properly, I played a
bit with LSP which helped me a lot, now, I have JTS 1.13 inside
solr.war; here is my challenge:
I have big polygon (A) which contains smaller polygons (B and C), B and
C have some intersection, so if I search for a
Furkan, see this post.
http://grokbase.com/t/lucene/solr-user/117t1eswyk/multiple-solr-servers-and-a-shared-index-again
Cumprimentos
--
Yago Riveiro
Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig)
On Tuesday, April 16, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Furkan KAMACI wrote:
> Hi Walter;
>
> You sai
Thanks for your detailed explanation. However you said:
"It will then choose one of those hosts/cores for each shard, and send a
request to them as a distributed search request." Is there any document
that explains of distributed search? What is the criteria for it?
2013/4/16 Upayavira
> If yo
Hi Walter;
You said: "It is not safe to share Solr index files between two Solr
servers". Why do you think like that?
2013/4/16 Tim Vaillancourt
> If centralization of storage is your goal by choosing NFS, iSCSI works
> reasonably well with SOLR indexes, although good local-storage will always
Hi
currently, my solr is deploy in tomcat1 and we have given 4GB memory of that
tomcat
Thanks & Regards
Montu v Boda
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/first-time-with-new-keyword-solr-take-to-much-time-to-give-the-result-tp4056254p4056261.html
Sent from the S
Hi,
Things to google ;)
1. warmup queries
2. solr cache
How much RAM does you index take now?
Dmitry
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Montu v Boda wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when we search with any new keyword at first time then solr 4.2.1 take to
> much time to give the result.
>
> we have 506 d
Could be a bug in the higlighter. But before claiming that, I would still
play around different options, like hl.fragSize, hl.highlightMultiTerm.
Also, have you considered storing synonyms in the index?
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 9:42 AM, juancesarvillalba <
juancesarvilla...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
Hi
We have a simple SolrCloud setup (4.2.1) running with a single shard and
two nodes, and it's working fine except whenever we send an update request,
the leader logs this error:
SEVERE: shard update error StdNode:
http://10.20.10.42:8080/solr/ts/:org.apache.solr.common.SolrException:
Server at
Hi,
when we search with any new keyword at first time then solr 4.2.1 take to
much time to give the result.
we have 506 document is index in solr and it's size is 400GB.
now when We search for keyword "test" it will take 1 min to give the
response for 1 rows.
we fire the query from the
If you are accessing Solr from Java code, you will likely use the SolrJ
client to do so. If your users are hitting Solr directly, you should
think about whether this is wise - as well as providing them with direct
search access, you are also providing them with the ability to delete
your entire ind
Hi,
I am new in Solr and wish to use version 4.2.x for my app in production. I
want to show hundreds and thousands of markers on a map with contents coming
from Solr. As the user moves around the map and pans, the browser will fetch
data/markers using a BBOX filter (based on the maps' viewport bou
Hi,
sorry for pushing, but I just replayed the steps with solr 4.0 where
everything works fine.
Then I switched to solr 4.2.1 and replayed the exact same steps and the
collection won't start and no leader will be elected.
Any clues ?
Should I try it on the developer mailing list, maybe it's a
Hi Shawn;
I am sorry but what kind of Load Balancing is that? I mean does it check
whether some leaders are using much CPU or RAM etc.? I think a problem may
occur at such kind of scenario: if some of leaders getting more documents
than other leaders (I don't know how it is decided that into which
101 - 115 of 115 matches
Mail list logo