The Grouping feature only works if groups are in the same shard.
Perhaps that is the problem here?
I could find https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4164 which
says that once the sharding was fixed, the problem went away. We
should come up with a better exception message though.
On Fri,
How can i get the json response from solr ?
I mean how can i get response of the searched results in json format
and print it in solarium php code ?
--
Regards,
*Sohan Kalsariya*
On 24 March 2014 12:35, Sohan Kalsariya sohankalsar...@gmail.com wrote:
How can i get the json response from solr ?
I mean how can i get response of the searched results in json format
and print it in solarium php code ?
Adding wt=json to the query will get you Solr results in JSON format.
My database configuration is as below
entity name=x query=SELECT ID, XMLSERIALIZE(SMRY as CLOB(1M)) as SMRY
FROM BOOK_REC fetch first 40 rows only
transformer=ClobTransformer
field column=MBR name=mbr /
entity name=y dataSource=xmldata dataField=x.SMRY
Hi,
Yonik, thank you for explaining me the reason of the issue. The workarounds
you suggested are working fine.
Kranti, your suggestion was also good :-)
Thanks a lot!
On 21 March 2014 20:00, Kranti Parisa kranti.par...@gmail.com wrote:
My example should also work, am I missing something?
Hi Greg,
This is my Clusterstate.json.
WatchedEvent state:SyncConnected type:None path:null
[zk: 10.10.1.72:2185(CONNECTED) 0] get /clusterstate.json
{set_recent:{
shards:{
shard1:{
range:8000-d554,
state:active,
replicas:{
Hi Greg,
This is my Clusterstate.json.
WatchedEvent state:SyncConnected type:None path:null
[zk: 10.10.1.72:2185(CONNECTED) 0] get /clusterstate.json
{set_recent:{
shards:{
shard1:{
range:8000-d554,
state:active,
replicas:{
1. I don't see the definition of a datasource named 'xmldata' in your
data-config.
2. You have forEach=/*:summary but I don't think that is a syntax
supported by XPathRecordReader.
If you can give a sample of the xml stored as Clob in your database,
then we can help you write the right xpaths.
Below is my full configuration,
dataConfig
dataSource driver=com.ibm.db2.jcc.DB2Driver
url=jdbc:db2://IP:port/dbname user= password= /
dataSource name=xmldata type=FieldReaderDataSource/
document
entity name=x query=SELECT ID, XMLSERIALIZE(SMRY as CLOB(1M)) as SMRY
FROM BOOK_REC fetch first 40
Hi Shalin,
Thank you for your answer.
I'm already using custom hashing to make sure all the docs that are going
to be grouped together are on the same shard. During index I make sure the
uniqueKey is something like:
productId!skuId
so all the skus belonging to the same product will end up
Hi all
While using solr 4.6 to highlight the result, I ran into a strange situation.
Most searching results were correctly highlighted.
But a few gave out all the content of the indexed webpage without any
highlighted keywords.
Is anybody ever met this problem?
Here is my solrconfig.xml
Hi,
You may need to increase hl.maxAnalyzedChars which has a default of 51200.
On Monday, March 24, 2014 2:33 PM, panzj.f...@cn.fujitsu.com
panzj.f...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
Hi all
While using solr 4.6 to highlight the result, I ran into a strange situation.
Most searching results were
Hi All
We have a 4 node cluster with a collection thats sharded into 2 and each
shard having a master and a slave for redundancy however 1 node has decied
to use twice the ram that the others are using within the cluster
The only difference we can spot between the node is that the one with the
Hi David;
Which version of Solr you are using?
Thanks;
Furkan KAMACI
2014-03-24 15:15 GMT+02:00 David Flower dflo...@amplience.com:
Hi All
We have a 4 node cluster with a collection thats sharded into 2 and each
shard having a master and a slave for redundancy however 1 node has decied
We¹re still on 4.4.0
David
On 24/03/2014 13:19, Furkan KAMACI furkankam...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David;
Which version of Solr you are using?
Thanks;
Furkan KAMACI
2014-03-24 15:15 GMT+02:00 David Flower dflo...@amplience.com:
Hi All
We have a 4 node cluster with a collection thats sharded
Yes, we upgraded solr from 4.6.1 to 4.7 3 weeks ago (2 weeks before solr
started crashing).
When we were upgrading, we just upgraded solr and changed versions in
collections configs.
When solr crashes we get OOM but only 2h after first Stopping recovery
warnings.
Maybe you have any ideas when
Sathya,
We're still missing a fair amount of information here though it looks like your
cluster is healthy. How are you indexing and what's the request you're sending
that results in the error you're seeing? Have you checked your nodes' logs for
errors that correspond with the one you're
I am guessing that it is all related to memory issues. I guess that as
the used heap increases, full GC cycles increase causing ZK timeouts
which in turn cause more recoveries to be initiated. In the end,
everything blows up with the out of memory errors. Do you log GC
activity on your servers?
I
On 3/24/2014 7:15 AM, David Flower wrote:
We have a 4 node cluster with a collection thats sharded into 2 and each
shard having a master and a slave for redundancy however 1 node has decied
to use twice the ram that the others are using within the cluster
The only difference we can spot
Garbage Collectors Summary:
https://apps.sematext.com/spm-reports/s/rgRnwuShgI
Pool Size:
https://apps.sematext.com/spm-reports/s/H16ndqichM
First Stopping recovery warning: 4:00, OOM error: 6:30.
2014-03-24 16:35 GMT+02:00 Shalin Shekhar Mangar shalinman...@gmail.com:
I am guessing that it
I¹m looking at dashboard page on all 4 nodes and seeing
Physical Memory 92% compared with ~41-44%
And JVM-Memory 52.9% compared to 23-28%
The reason I mentioned slave is that on the core overview page there is
An entry for Slave (Searching) that doesn¹t appear on any of the other
nodes
Cheers,
glad the suggestions are working for you!
Thanks,
Kranti K. Parisa
http://www.linkedin.com/in/krantiparisa
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 4:10 AM, Marcin Rzewucki mrzewu...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
Yonik, thank you for explaining me the reason of the issue. The workarounds
you suggested are working
We tried to set ZK timeout to 1s and did load testing (both indexing and
search) and this issue didn't happen.
2014-03-24 17:00 GMT+02:00 Lukas Mikuckis lukasmikuc...@gmail.com:
Garbage Collectors Summary:
Hi;
When I generate snippet via Solr I do not want to remove beginning of any
sentence at the snippet. So I need to do a sentence detection. I think that
I can do it before I send documents into Solr. I can put some special
characters that signs beginning or end of a sentence. Then I can use that
I¹m looking at dashboard page on all 4 nodes and seeing
Physical Memory 92% compared with ~41-44%
And JVM-Memory 52.9% compared to 23-28%
The reason I mentioned slave is that on the core overview page there is
An entry for Slave (Searching) that doesn¹t appear on any of the other
nodes
Its not saw toothing though it’s sitting solidly at 52%
On 24/03/2014 15:46, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote:
I¹m looking at dashboard page on all 4 nodes and seeing
Physical Memory 92% compared with ~41-44%
And JVM-Memory 52.9% compared to 23-28%
The reason I mentioned slave is that
The only message I get is:
Indexing completed. Added/Updated: 0 documents. Deleted 0 documents.
Requests: 1, Skipped: 0
And there are no errors in the log.
Here's what the ibm atom feed looks like:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-16?
atom:feed xmlns:atom=http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom;
On 3/24/2014 9:48 AM, David Flower wrote:
Its not saw toothing though it’s sitting solidly at 52%
It may be very difficult to see the sawtooth effect unless you actually
connect an app like jconsole to your running Solr instance and watch the
graphs over time.
My point was that what you've
Hi,
Query rewrite happens down the chain, after query parsing. For example a
wildcard query triggers an index based query rewrite where terms matching
the wildcard are added into the original query.
In your case, looks like the query rewrite will generate the ngrams and add
them into the
Shawn,
Thanks for pointing me in the right direction. After consulting the
above document I *think* that the problem may be too large of a heap
and which may be affecting GC collection and hence causing ZK
timeouts.
We have around 20G of memory on these machines with a min/max of heap
at 6, 8
Hello all, we have a SolrCloud implementation in production, with two servers
running Solr 4.3.1 in a SolrCloud configuration. Our search index is about
70-80GB in size. The trouble is that after several days of uptime, we will
suddenly have periods where the operating system Solr is running
My Lucene index - built with Solr using Lucene4.1 - is corrupted. Upon trying
to read the index using the following code I get
org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: No such core: collection1 exception:
File configFile = new File(cacheFolder + File.separator + solr.xml);
CoreContainer container =
Hi,
I’m trying to integrate Solr with Nutch and I performed all of the necessary
steps except after Nutch performs the crawl it appears that I’m receiving a
connection refused.
2014-03-24 11:42:43,062 INFO indexer.IndexerMapReduce - IndexerMapReduce:
crawldb: TestCrawl/crawldb
2014-03-24
So the problem might be because I’m running solr on tomcat port 8080. is there
a way to resolve this so I can run the command successfully?
Thanks,
Laura
On Mar 24, 2014, at 1:33 PM, Laura McCord lmcc...@ucmerced.edu wrote:
Hi,
I’m trying to integrate Solr with Nutch and I performed all
Hi Furkan,
I have done an implementation with a custom filler (special character)
sequence in between sentences. A better solution I landed at was increasing
the position of each sentence's first token by a large number, like 1
(perhaps, a smaller number could be used too). Then a user search
I confirmed the xpath is correct with a third party XPath visualizer.
/atom:feed/atom:entry parses the xml correctly.
Can anyone confirm or deny that the dataimporthandler can handle an atom
feed?
--
View this message in context:
On 3/19/14 5:13 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: Hi,
Guessing it's surround query parser's support for within backed by span
queries.
Otis
You mean this?
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SurroundQueryParser
I guess this parser needs improvement in documentation area.
It doesn't explain or have an
Hi,
Have a look at:
http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_1_0/core/org/apache/lucene/index/CheckIndex.html
HTH,
Dmitry
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 8:16 PM, zqzuk ziqizh...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
My Lucene index - built with Solr using Lucene4.1 - is corrupted. Upon
trying
to read the index using the
Hi
Thanks.
But I am already using CheckIndex and the error is given by the CheckIndex
utility: it could not even continue after reporting could not read any
segements file in directory.
--
View this message in context:
Ok, I found one typo:
the links need to be this: /atom:feed/atom:entry/atom:link/@href
But the import still doesn't work... :(
I guess I have to convert the feed over to RSS 2.0
--
View this message in context:
I think SQP is getting axed, no?
Otis
--
Performance Monitoring * Log Analytics * Search Analytics
Solr Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 3:45 PM, T. Kuro Kurosaka k...@healthline.comwrote:
On 3/19/14 5:13 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: Hi,
Guessing it's
Hello,
We are trying to reindex as part of our move from 3.6.2 to 4.6.1
and have faced various issues reindexing 1.5 Million docs. We dont use
solrcloud, its still Master/Slave config. For testing this Iam using a
single test server reading from it and putting back into same index.
We
I recently deployed Solr to back the site search feature of a site I work
on. The site itself is available in hundreds of languages. With the initial
release of site search we have enabled the feature for ten of those
languages. This is distributed across eight cores, with two Chinese
languages
Jack, thanks.
Actually the 20K events/sec is some low-end rate we estimated. It is not
necessarily related to sensor; when you want to centralize data from many
sources, regardless multi-tenancy, even for a single tenant, many events per
second have to be handled.
I have a question regarding
In 3.5.0 we have the following.
fieldType name=autocomplete class=solr.TextField
positionIncrementGap=100
analyzer type=index
tokenizer class=solr.StandardTokenizerFactory/
filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/
filter class=solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory
Hi,
There is no w/int syntax in surround.
/* Query language operators: OR, AND, NOT, W, N, (, ), ^, *, ?, and comma */
Ahmet
On Monday, March 24, 2014 9:46 PM, T. Kuro Kurosaka k...@healthline.com wrote:
On 3/19/14 5:13 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: Hi,
Guessing it's surround query parser's
That is similar to Verity VQL, but that used NEAR/10. --wunder
On Mar 24, 2014, at 4:21 PM, Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
There is no w/int syntax in surround.
/* Query language operators: OR, AND, NOT, W, N, (, ), ^, *, ?, and comma */
Ahmet
On Monday, March 24,
: What is the default value for the required attribute of a field element
: in a schema? I've just looked everywhere I can think of in the wiki, the
: reference manual, and the JavaDoc. Most of the documentation doesn't
: even mention that attribute.
Good catch, fixed...
Solr In Action has a significant discussion on the multi-lingual
approach. They also have some code samples out there. Might be worth a
look
Regards,
Alex.
Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch
- Time is the quality of nature
On 25 March 2014 01:15, eShard zim...@yahoo.com wrote:
I confirmed the xpath is correct with a third party XPath visualizer.
/atom:feed/atom:entry parses the xml correctly.
Can anyone confirm or deny that the dataimporthandler can handle an atom
feed?
Yes, an ATOM feed can be consumed by
Basically we just created this syntax for the ease of users, otherwise on
back end it uses W or N operators.
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:21 AM, Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
There is no w/int syntax in surround.
/* Query language operators: OR, AND, NOT, W, N, (, ), ^, *, ?, and
perhaps useful, here is an open source implementation with near[digit]
support, incl analysis of proximity tokens. When days become longer maybe
itwill be packaged into a nice lib...:-)
https://github.com/romanchyla/montysolr/blob/master/contrib/adsabs/grammars/ADS.g
On 25 Mar 2014 00:14, Salman
Found it - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5481
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 8:11 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
Recently fixed in Lucene - should be able to find the issue if you dig a
little.
--
Mark Miller
about.me/markrmiller
On March 21, 2014 at 10:25:56 AM,
I am beginner with solr, started playing with solr for last one month.
I am building a search mechanism for the http://allevents.in and i want to
implement semantic search with solr, when someone search events in our
website. And the back-end is in php(solarium-client). So can you please
guide me
54 matches
Mail list logo
