You really have to provide more detail here.
bq: Moreover, solr is not allowing to get data from both the core.
What do you mean? the second core is unavailable? Solr joins
do not return data from the from table. I really suggest you
try denormalizing the data first, don't try to use Solr like
Also could you please tell me the difference between searching a text in the
following ways
q=Exact_Word:samplestring
q=samplestringqf=Exact_Word
I am trying to understand how enclosing the full term in is resolving
this problem ? What does it tell to solr ?
Other than the exclamation mark
We have noticed Solr returns in-consistent results during replica recovery and
not all replicas are in the same state, so when your query goes to a replica
which might be recovering or still copying the index then the counts may differ.
regards,Ayush
Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 16:14:36 +0530
Hi Sandeep,
I have same requirement as well. Finally do you get solution for the same?
If yes, please post the schema.xml and solrconfig.xml configs here
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Multiword-Search-tp4053038p4135073.html
Sent from the Solr - User
On 12 May 2014 21:41, helder.sepulveda helder.sepulv...@homes.com wrote:
I been trying to index data from other solr servers but the import always
shows:
Indexing completed. Added/Updated: 0 documents. Deleted 0 documents.
Requests: 1, Fetched: 0, Skipped: 0, Processed
My data config looks
There are two previous threads in the list that i think can help you,
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-solr-user/201405.mbox/%3c1398929537117-4134045.p...@n3.nabble.com%3E
Hi Al,
http://jmeter.apache.org
Ahmet
On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 1:11 PM, Al Krinker al.krin...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to test performance of my cluster (solr 4.8).
SolrMeter looked promising... small and standalone. Plus, open source so
that I could make tweaks if needed.
However,
What worked for me was tweaking a code from velocity file, head.vm, I changed
'terms.prefix': function() { return $(#q).val().toLowerCase();}, which
solved my issue as I am using terms component for suggestions.
Dmitry Kan-2 wrote
what kind of suggester are you using? Does its index get rebuilt
The q.alt param specifies only the parameter to use if the q parameter is
missing. Could you verify whether that is really the case? Typically
solrconfig gives a default of *:* for the q parameter. Specifying a query
via the q.alt parameter seems like a strange approach - what is your
Elisabeth, i think you are looking for SOLR-3211 that introduced
spellcheck.collateParam.* to override e.g. dismax settings.
Markus
-Original message-
From:elisabeth benoit elisaelisael...@gmail.com
Sent:Wed 14-05-2014 14:01
Subject:permissive mm value and efficient spellchecking
I am trying to use the solr cloud for solr 4.2.0 and solr 4.7.1.
Here mcats is our collection name.
*With solr 4.2*
shard1: localhost:8019
shard1: localhost:6019
*With solr 4.7.1*
shard1: localhost:8983
shard1: localhost:1983
With both the server i make the copy of example directory as
I also tried it to query specific shard to make sure that the unique record
is present in different shards but still no success.
http://localhost:8983/solr/mcats/select?q.alt=id:174060shards=localhost:8983/solr/mcats
Yes that happens due to the ! mark.
Also can someone please tell me the difference between searching a text in
the following ways
1. q=Exact_Word:samplestring
2. q=samplestringqf=Exact_Word
3. q=samplestringqf=Exact_Word
I think the first and the third one are the same. is it correct ? How
Exclamation point is the shortcut for the NOT operator. See the minus in
front of the second generated term?
You need to escape it, either with backslash or enclosing the full term in
quotes. Or use the term query parser.
Here's a list of the special characters for the query parser:
The general rule everywhere is that the default time zone is the local time
zone of the server processing the date. Could you verify whether your server
is in fact set to be +03:00.
If your convention for your database is that the default time zone is GMT,
then you will have to manually add
Hello,
I'm using solr 4.2.1.
I use a very permissive value for mm, to be able to find results even if
request contains non relevant words.
At the same time, I'd like to be able to do some efficient spellcheking
with solrdirectspellchecker.
So for instance, if user searches for rue de Chraonne
Aman,
You may want to try the Heliosearch Distribution For Solr. This is a free,
pre-built Tomcat/Solr distro.
http://heliosearch.com/download.html
When you open up the zip file there is an examples.txt file in server/bin
that has a couple SolrCloud examples.
Joel
Joel Bernstein
Search
Hi,
I wonder about performance difference of 2 indexing options:
1- multivalued field
2- separate fields
The case is as follows:
Each document has 100 properties: prop1..prop100.
The values are strings and there is no relation between different properties.
I would like to search by
Here is the relevant portion of the schema:
fields
field name=sz_id type=string indexed=true
stored=true/
field name=batch_address type=string indexed=false
stored=true/
field name=batch_citytype=string indexed=false
stored=true/
field name=batch_state
Hello my friend :)
i want to monitor the taken time of dih with zabbix. which is the best
indicator of the update-time when you using the dataimporthandler. is time
taken correct or do you think one of request time in mbeans is better? i
dont think that the value of 5minRateReqsPerSecond is a
I am trying to test performance of my cluster (solr 4.8).
SolrMeter looked promising... small and standalone. Plus, open source so
that I could make tweaks if needed.
However, I see that the last update date was in Oct 2012. Is it dead? Any
better non commercial and preferably open sourced
Hi,
I am in the process of upgrading an extension I made to QueryComponent from
solr 3.4 to solr 4.8.
I am wrapping the query into a filteredquery together with a termsfilter
that encapsulates a lot of Terms for up to two fields (potentially 10s of
thousands, only two in my simple test case).
My
Hi,
All same, for single term queries it makes no sense/difference to use quotes.
Quotes are proximity operators, it requires at least two clauses/terms.
Actually I coudn't re-produce your problem with 4.8.0. With
q=d!sdasdsdwasd...@dsadsadas.edu it is not treated as NOT operator. What
Thank you Elaine,
splitted files worked for me too.
2014-05-06 19:15 GMT+02:00 Cario, Elaine elaine.ca...@wolterskluwer.com:
Hi Giovanni,
I had the same issue just last week! I worked around it temporarily by
segmenting the file into 1 MB files, and then using a comma-delimited
list of
Hi,
Is there any guarantee that every document is persisted on disk during a
commit avalanche that produces the: ERROR org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore
– org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error opening new searcher. *exceeded
limit of maxWarmingSearchers*=1, try again later.
I've made some
Dear Team,
I am Vignesh using the latest version 4.8.0 Apache Solr and am
Indexing my PDF but getting an error and have posted that below for your
reference. Kindly guide me to solve this error.
D:\IPCB\solrjava -Durl=http://localhost:8082/solr/ipcb/update/extract
-Dparams=
Hey,
I got pretty big index with about 7 mln doccuments.
I got pretty slow query when i ask about common word. Nothing changes when i
ask by q or fq.
params={fl=score,class_nameindent=trueq=*:*wt=xmlfq=class_name:CdnFile}
hits=5594978 status=0 QTime=408
It't not about my hardware tho. I was
27 matches
Mail list logo
