good.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/DIH-timezone-offset-tp504958p4137077.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
Do you know how to optimize index on a single shard only ? I was trying to
use optimize=truewaitFlush=trueshard.keys=myshard but it does not work
- it optimizes all shards instead of just one.
Kind regards.
Hi Marcin,
just a guess, pass distrib=false ?
Ahmet
On Tuesday, May 20, 2014 10:23 AM, Marcin Rzewucki mrzewu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Do you know how to optimize index on a single shard only ? I was trying to
use optimize=truewaitFlush=trueshard.keys=myshard but it does not work
- it
In hebrew words could contain the character **
ex: דוח
I would like to know how to configure my schema.xml to be able to index and
search correctly those types of words.
If I search this character ** inside solr query tool I got this debug:
/debug: {
rawquerystring: \,
querystring: \,
Thank you for your reply! I also found docValues after sending an
email and your suggestion seems the best solution for me.
Now I'm configuring schema.xml to use docValues and have a question
about docValuesFormat.
According to this thread(
Am 19.05.2014 19:25, schrieb Mikhail Khludnev:
Thomas,
Vanilla way to override a blocks is to send it with the same unique-key (I
guess it's id for your case, btw don't you have unique-key defined in the
schema?), but it must have at least one child. It seems like analysis issue
to me
Hi.
I am using solr4.6, in one my core it contains 50 million docs,and I am
just click the optimized button on the overview page of the core,and the
whole web instance hangs,one phenomenon is the DIH on another core hanged.
Is it a known problem or something wrong with my env?
Regards
Hi,
It is special query parser character, so it needs to be escaped.
http://lucene.apache.org/core/2_9_4/queryparsersyntax.html#Escaping%20Special%20Characters
Ahmet
On Tuesday, May 20, 2014 10:57 AM, heyyo lionel.enka...@gmail.com wrote:
In hebrew words could contain the character **
ex:
Hi Marcin
Thanks to your mail,now I know why my cloud hangs when I just click the
optimize button on the overview page of the shard.
2014-05-20 15:25 GMT+08:00 Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com:
Hi Marcin,
just a guess, pass distrib=false ?
Ahmet
On Tuesday, May 20, 2014 10:23 AM,
Hi
Maybe you can try _router_=myshard? I will check the source code ,note you
later.
2014-05-20 17:19 GMT+08:00 YouPeng Yang yypvsxf19870...@gmail.com:
Hi Marcin
Thanks to your mail,now I know why my cloud hangs when I just click the
optimize button on the overview page of the shard.
Well, it should not hang if all is configured fine :) How many shards and
memory you have ? Note that optimize rewrites index so you might need
additional disk space for this process. Optimizing works fine however I'd
like to be able to do it on a single shard as well.
On 20 May 2014 11:19,
Hi
My DIH work indeed hangs, I have only four shards,each has a master and a
replica.Maybe jvm memory size is very low.it was 3G while the size of every
my core is almost 16GB.
I also have found that the size of the master increased during the
optimization(you can check on the overview page of
As I wrote before index is being rewritten so it grows during optimization
and later is reduced. I guess there was OOM in your case.
On 20 May 2014 12:11, YouPeng Yang yypvsxf19870...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
My DIH work indeed hangs, I have only four shards,each has a master and a
Hi Everyone,
I have installed Solr Cloud 4.6.2 with external Zookeeper and Tomcat,
having 3 shards with 2 replica each. I tried indexing some documents which
went easy.
After which I restarted my Tomcat, and now the Shards are not getting up,
its coming up with bunch of Exceptions. First
It looks like it was escaped in the query, but the word delimiter filter
will remove it and treat it as if it were white space.
The types attribute for WDF can point to a file containing the types for
various characters, so you could map a quote to ALPHA.
The doc is sketchy, but there are
May 2014, Apache Solr™ 4.8.1 available
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 4.8.1
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform
from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful
full-text search, hit highlighting, faceted
To be clear, you cannot update a single document of a nested document in
place - you must reindex the whole block, parent and all children. This is
because this feature relies on the underlying Lucene block join feature that
requires that the documents be contiguous, and updating a single child
Am 20.05.2014 14:11, schrieb Jack Krupansky:
To be clear, you cannot update a single document of a nested document
in place - you must reindex the whole block, parent and all children.
This is because this feature relies on the underlying Lucene block
join feature that requires that the
Hi Everyone,
I am trying to setup Solr Cloud referring to the blog
http://myjeeva.com/solrcloud-cluster-single-collection-deployment.html
if I complete the set in one go, then it seems to be going fine.
when the setup is complete and I am trying to restart Solr by restarted
Tomcat instance, it
We are running Solr 4.6.1 in AWS:
- 2 Solr instances (1 shard, 1 leader, 1 replica)
- 1 CloudSolrServer SolrJ client updating the index.
- 3 Zookeepers
The Solr instances are behind a load balanceer and also in an auto scaling
group. The ScaleUpPolicy will add up to 9 additional instances
Great, thanks for the information! Right now we're using the StandardTokenizer
types to filter out CJK characters with a custom filter. I'll test using
MappingCharFilters, although I'm a little concerned with possible adverse
scenarios.
Diego Fernandez - 爱国
Software Engineer
US GSS
Hi,
I have changed as amp
Now, core is getting initialized. But document added in elevate.xml is not
coming as top result.
elevate
query text=*analog*
doc
id=sitecore://master/{137f5eb3-eb84-4165-bef0-5be1fbbc3201}?lang=enamp;ver=1/
/query
/elevate
Also, why below query is not
This is using the solr.TrieDateField, it is the field type date from the
example schema in solr 4.6.1:
fieldType name=date class=solr.TrieDateField precisionStep=0
positionIncrementGap=0 /
After further testing I was only able to reproduce this in a sharded
replicated environment (numShards=3,
Hi Diego,
Did you miss Shawn's response? His ICUTokenizerFactory solution is better than
mine.
By the way, what solr version are you using? Does StandardTokenizer set type
attribute for CJK words?
To filter out given types, you not need a custom filter. Type Token filter
serves exactly that
Hey Ahmet,
Yeah I had missed Shawn's response, I'll have to give that a try as well. As
for the version, we're using 4.4. StandardTokenizer sets type for HANGUL,
HIRAGANA, IDEOGRAPHIC, KATAKANA, and SOUTHEAST_ASIAN and you're right, we're
using TypeTokenFilter to remove those.
Diego
not sure what to make of this...
The presence of the {!tag} entry changes the filter query generated by
the {!field...} tag. Note below that in one case the filter query is a
phrase query, and in the other it's parsed with one term against the
specified field and the other against the default
: The presence of the {!tag} entry changes the filter query generated by
: the {!field...} tag. Note below that in one case the filter query is a
: phrase query, and in the other it's parsed with one term against the
: specified field and the other against the default field.
I think you are
: when local params are embedded in a query being parsed by the
: LuceneQParser, it applies them using the same scoping as other query
: operators
:
: : fq: {!tag=name_name}{!field f=name}United States
Think of that example in the context of this one -- the basics of
On 5/20/2014 2:01 AM, Jeongseok Son wrote:
Though it uses only small amount of memory I'm worried about memory
usage because I have to store so many documents. (32GB RAM / total 5B
docs, sum of docs. of all cores)
If you've only got 32GB of RAM and there are five billion docs on the
system,
On 5/20/2014 7:10 AM, Tim Burner wrote:
I am trying to setup Solr Cloud referring to the blog
http://myjeeva.com/solrcloud-cluster-single-collection-deployment.html
if I complete the set in one go, then it seems to be going fine.
when the setup is complete and I am trying to restart Solr
: So I think when I was paging through the results, if the query for page N
: was handled by replica1 and page N+1 handled by replica2, and the page
: boundary happened to be where the reversed rows were, this would produce
: the behavior I was seeing where the last row from the previous page was
On 5/19/2014 2:05 PM, Bryan Bende wrote:
Using Solr 4.6.1 and in my schema I have a date field storing the time a
document was added to Solr.
I have a utility program which:
- queries for all of the documents in the previous day sorted by create date
- pages through the results keeping
Hi,
What is the filter to be used to implement stemming for Chinese and Japanese
language field types.
For English, I have used filter class=solr.SnowballPorterFilterFactory
language=English / and its working fine.
Appreciate your help!
Thanks,
G. Naresh Kumar
--
View this message in
Hi,
I have a project, where we need to do aggregations over facetted values. The
stats component is not powerful enough anymore and the new statistic component
seems not to be ready yet. I understand that it's not easy to create a general
purpose component for this task. I decided to check
Achim,
Solr can be extended to plugin custom analytics. The code snippet you
mention is part of the framework which enables this.
Here is how you do it:
1) Create a QParserPlugin that returns a Query that extends PostFilter.
2) Then implement the PostFilter api and return a DelegatingCollector
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Achim Domma do...@procoders.net wrote:
- I found several times code snippets like if (collector instanceof
DelegatingCollector) { ((DelegatingCollector)collector).finish() } . Such
code is considered bad practice in every OO language I know. Do I miss
Marcin is correct. The index size on disk will perhaps double. (triple
in compound case). The reason is so you don't lose your index if the
process is interrupted.
Consider the case where you're optimizing to one segment.
1 All the current segments are copied into the new segment
2 The new
First thing I'd look at is the log on the server. It's possible that
you've changed the configuration such that Solr can't start. Shot in
the dark, but that's where I'd start looking.
Best,
Erick
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 4:45 AM, Tim Burner imtimbur...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I have
Thanks Chris!
The query parsing stuff is something I keep stumbling over, but you
may have noticed that!
Erick
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: when local params are embedded in a query being parsed by the
: LuceneQParser, it applies them
Hi
I am using Solr on a 4 node CDH5 cluster (1 namenode, 3 datanodes).
I am running the solr-server on the namenode, and the solr-indexer on each
of the datanodes, alongside the hbase regionservers, for NRT indexing of a
hbase table.
The basics of the indexing seem to work - when I add records
Well, you can always make documents in Solr visible by issuing a hard
commit or waiting for your hard commit (openSeacher=true) or soft
commit interval to expire.
But as far as the Cloudera product, you'd get much better answers by
asking in Cloudera-specific forums. Here's a place to start...
I think multiValue is copied multi values, index is bigger and query easy,
but performance may worse, but it depends on how to using.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-performance-multiValued-filed-vs-separate-fields-tp4136121p4137289.html
Sent from the
42 matches
Mail list logo
