Hi,
Anyone tried to implement korean language in solr 3.6.1. I define the field as
below in my schema file but the fieldtype is not working.
fieldType name=text_kr class=solr.TextField positionIncrementGap=1000
analyzer type=index
tokenizer class=solr.KoreanTokenizerFactory/
Double check your xml file that you don't - for example - define your
fieldType outside of fields section. Or maybe you have exception
earlier about some component in the type definition.
This is not about Korean language, it seems. Something more
fundamentally about XML config.
Regards,
Dear Team,
I am working on solr 4.8.1 version. I want to integrate solr with NLP in
order to improve the search relevancy. I am following the tutorials:
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/OpenNLP
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2899
Its says:
- pull the latest trunk or 4.0 branch
I have defined the fieldtype inside the fields section. When i checked the
error log i found the below error
Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: solr.KoreanTokenizerFactory
SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: analyzer without class or
tokenizer filter list
Do i need to
I don't think Solr ships with Korean Tokenizer, does it?
If you are using a 3rd party one, you need to give full class name,
not just solr.Korean... And you need the library added in the lib
statement in solrconfig.xml (at least in Solr 4).
Regards,
Alex.
Personal website:
Till now I was thinking solr will support KoreanTokenizer. I haven't used any
other 3rd party one.
Actually the issue i am facing is I need to integrate English, Chinese,
Japanese and Korean language search in a single site. Based on the user's
selected language to search the fields will be
I would suggest you read through all 12 (?) articles in this series:
http://discovery-grindstone.blogspot.com/2013/10/cjk-with-solr-for-libraries-part-1.html
. It will probably lay out most of the issues for you.
And if you are starting, I would really suggest using the latest Solr
(4.9). A lot
Hi all,
Hope I am in the right place.
I currently have a setup which is a Solr Cloud which has 3 nodes, I then
have a zookeeper assemble with 3 nodes as well.
I am doing a dataimport which fills the index with 3.8 million documents, if
I look in the 'Cloud' section of the Solr admin
Yeah, using multiple _query_’s has always been possible. _query_ is just a
special field name that gets interpreted specially. Same with _val_ for
function queries.
It’s a feature that’s been leveraged and “documented” (by way of presentation
materials and blogs, at least) such as:
-
Hi
I am using same solrconfig.xml which comes in default solr package.
Do i need to make change anywhere?
Thanks,
Ameya
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com.invalid
wrote:
Hi,
Field name sent with literal is Modified. In your screenshot, it is
last_modified . Do
Thank you very much Mikhail.
Walter
Ing. Walter Liguori
2014-07-09 21:43 GMT+02:00 Mikhail Khludnev mkhlud...@griddynamics.com:
Colleagues,
So far you can either vote or contribute to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5743
Walter,
Usually, index-time tricks loose relationships
Hi everyone,
currently I am taking some performance measurements on a Solr
installation and I am trying to figure out if what I see mostly fits
expectations:
The data is as follows:
- solr 4.8.1
- 8 millon documents
- mostly office documents with real text content, stored
- index size on
How is running multiple queries at the same time different from running
them in parallel? So, why not just run them in parallel. I mean, Solr can
accept simultaneous query requests just fine, so what's the issue here?
IOW, put the logic in your application layer and use SOlr as a streamlined
Hi guys,
I'm struggling testing schemaAPI REST endpoints thourgh EmbeddedSolrServer.
Out of the box the Embedded Solr Server is not able to recognize the schema
request handler. So I was trying to follow an approach like this :
public static void init() throws Exception {
final
Hi Kamal,
Uncommitted code may not work.
Have you considered using
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/UIMA+Integration
Ahmet
On Thursday, July 10, 2014 10:33 AM, Kamal Kishore Aggarwal
kkroyal@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Team,
I am working on solr 4.8.1 version. I want to
Hi!
I'm trying to setup SolrCloud on single node
(the reason I'm using Cloud version is I want to use aliasing collections
feature).
I want to use external Zookeeper (located on the same node)
and Tomcat. I followed the instructions from:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCloudTomcat
However,
Hi,
Okey then remove this line from solrconfig.xml
str name=uprefixignored_/str
and explicitly define a field named Modified in schema.xml with stored=true.
With this you should be able to see Modified field. Please see definition of
uprefix parameter :
Hi all:
We have a small installation of Solr 3.6 in our hands, right now we have 3
physical servers (1 master and 2 slaves) the ingestion process it’s done in the
master which replicates by solr internal mechanism into the slaves, which
handles all the queries. We are trying to update to Solr
Hi,
Please find below solr log:
INFO - 2014-07-09 15:30:56.243;
org.apache.solr.update.processor.LogUpdateProcessor;
[collection1] webapp=/solr path=/update/extract params={literal.deny_token_
document=DEAD_AUTHORITYliteral.DocIcon=docxresource.name=Anarchism-
Thanks Erick Shawn, I will analyze with your input and share outcome.
Thanks
Ravi
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 12:17 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Lower/UpperCase Issue
Side note. Puttling
Hi,
Okey you want to use the value that sent with literal.Modified parameter.
First, try literalsOverride=true parameter.
If that does not work, use FirstFieldValueUpdateProcessorFactory to reduce
multivalued modified field to a single valued one.
ahmet
On Thursday, July 10, 2014 9:16 PM,
Also,
When using below dynamic field
dynamicField name=* type=string multiValued=true stored=true
indexed=true /
You said that we will get to see all field generated solr-cell and mcf.
Where exactly i could see all these fields so that i can create my schema?
Thanks,
Ameya
On Thu, Jul 10,
Hi,
With that dynamic filed approach, you can see all these fields' values in
result/response page. e.g. q=*:*fl=*
Ahmet
On Thursday, July 10, 2014 10:18 PM, Ameya Aware ameya.aw...@gmail.com wrote:
Also,
When using below dynamic field
dynamicField name=* type=string multiValued=true
Got it. Thanks man.
Ameya
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com.invalid
wrote:
Hi,
With that dynamic filed approach, you can see all these fields' values in
result/response page. e.g. q=*:*fl=*
Ahmet
On Thursday, July 10, 2014 10:18 PM, Ameya Aware
Thank you very much. Now I understand what was the idea. It is better than
changing Solr. But does performance remain same in this situation?
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 10:43 PM, Chris Hostetter hossman_luc...@fucit.org
wrote:
I think you are missunderstanding what Himanshu is suggesting to you.
EmbeddedSolrServer is really just for dealing with embedded SolrCore
objects. It doesn't have ay of the other HTTP related plumbing
assocaited with it -- which is why it can't be used for replication and/or
cloud features, let alone the RESTLet based endpoints.
if you want to write a test
Hello,
I'm moving to Solr from another search engine that would always return a
snippet even for any empty/null search. In the case of an empty/null
search, the first N characters would be returned as the summary snippet.
What would be the best way to configure Solr and index content so that at
Hi,
Please see hl.alternateField and hl.maxAlternateFieldLength parameters.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HighlightingParameters#hl.alternateField
Ahmet
On Friday, July 11, 2014 12:03 AM, Michael Keeling michael.keel...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
I'm moving to Solr from another search engine
Are there any plans to release this feature anytime soon ? I think this is
pretty important as a lot of search use case are dependent on the facet
count being returned by the search result. This issue renders renders the
CollapsingQParserPlugin pretty much unusable. I'm now reverting back to the
Yes, slide 11 of first presentation and slide 35 of the second one do
show that the _query or {!} can be used multiple types in one top
query. The other slides/links do not, they only show it once.
So, I think a lot of people may be missing that power. I suspect it's
a bit like using the bbox
Hi Jack Krupansky,
Thank you for your answer.
Yes, I meant that in parallel.
so, do you mean I should build sold component to run them in parallel ?
I am not good at JAVA, is there any why to do that with built in solr component
?
Thanks,
Chunki.
On Jul 10, 2014, at 11:53 PM, Jack
There is no built-in component to do this kind of split. But there is
a SynonymFilter, which is shown in the example schema and, I think,
mentioned in the tutorial. Are you sure your needs are not covered by
that already?
Regards,
Alex.
Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/
Current
For now,I used solr 4.7.1, when I test the partial update operation, I found it
worked fine in HttpSolrServer, But when I used solr cloud CloudSolrServer , it
cannot be supported!!!
The document will be updated totally instead of partial update!!!
The code I used in my program
Yes it does and pretty straight forward.
Refer to following url :
http://heliosearch.org/solr/atomic-updates/
http://www.mumuio.com/solrj-4-0-0-alpha-atomic-updates/
--
View this message in context:
34 matches
Mail list logo