Hi Ahmet,
The installation step at wiki.apache.org/solr/OpenNLP ran succesfully. I
copied the following jars:
solr/contrib/opennlp/lib/opennlp-maxent-3.0.3.jar
solr/contrib/opennlp/lib/opennlp-tools-1.5.3.jar
in the lib directory of the solr.
I made the changes in the schema.xml. Created
Hi,
How do i make delta import detect deleted values.
I do have a timestamp column to detect changes ,but the requirement is such
that rows will be deleted from the table.Every time i run delta import the
index still shows the deleted value.
How do i make delta import detect deleted values so
Thanks shamik, I will check it!
--
Gabriel Zhang
On Friday, July 11, 2014 1:39 PM, shamik sham...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes it does and pretty straight forward.
Refer to following url :
http://heliosearch.org/solr/atomic-updates/
http://www.mumuio.com/solrj-4-0-0-alpha-atomic-updates/
Thank you Chris,
Exactly as you suggested I was looking into related classes to that one.
Playing with :
@BeforeClass
public static void init() throws Exception {
final SortedMapServletHolder,String extraServlets = new
TreeMapServletHolder,String();
final ServletHolder solrRestApi
Hi,
You need a soft deletion column. Don't delete the entry instead mark it as
deleted/inactive etc.
Ahmet
On Friday, July 11, 2014 10:12 AM, madhav bahuguna madhav.bahug...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
How do i make delta import detect deleted values.
I do have a timestamp column to detect changes
Dear Sir/Madam
I am not sure about which email I should send my questions to because I do not
want this to be answered publicly. Is the channel to communicate personally to
the person who can answer my questions relating to Solr functionalities? If It
is I would appreciate your reply and I
Actually it seems to me that the current behavior is unwanted.
For use cases of exact match (or lowercased), I can use string fieldtype or
keywords tokenizer.
When I want documents sponsored with only partial match I should be able to
use a whitespace tokenizer.
Current behavior prevents that
On 7/11/2014 1:04 AM, madhav bahuguna wrote:
How do i make delta import detect deleted values.
I do have a timestamp column to detect changes ,but the requirement is such
that rows will be deleted from the table.Every time i run delta import the
index still shows the deleted value.
How do i
On 7/11/2014 5:56 AM, Veeger Worakamon wrote:
I am not sure about which email I should send my questions to because I do
not want this to be answered publicly. Is the channel to communicate
personally to the person who can answer my questions relating to Solr
functionalities? If It is I
Dear Shawn,
Thank you very much.
Best regards,
Worakamon
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Shawn Heisey [mailto:s...@elyograg.org]
Verzonden: vrijdag 11 juli 2014 15:44
Aan: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Onderwerp: Re: Inquiries
On 7/11/2014 5:56 AM, Veeger Worakamon wrote:
I am not sure
On 11 July 2014 19:14, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 7/11/2014 5:56 AM, Veeger Worakamon wrote:
I am not sure about which email I should send my questions to because I do
not want this to be answered publicly. Is the channel to communicate
personally to the person who can
Hi there,
We're trying to evaluate whether to use the CloudSolrServer in SolrJ or to
use the HttpSolrServer that is pointed at a software or hardware load
balancer such as haproxy or f5. This would be in production.
Can anyone provide any experiential pros or cons on these? In addition to
We are upgrading to Solr 4.8 from 3.5, and I was testing search results with
4.8. I found that with an edismax request handler the pf param is being
treated differently.
In 3.5 it was used as a disjunction max with tiebreaker, i.e. the max score
from all the matching fields was taken and the
On 7/11/2014 10:09 AM, jimtronic wrote:
We're trying to evaluate whether to use the CloudSolrServer in SolrJ or to
use the HttpSolrServer that is pointed at a software or hardware load
balancer such as haproxy or f5. This would be in production.
Can anyone provide any experiential pros or
: So, I think a lot of people may be missing that power. I suspect it's
I've added some comments to the relevant pages as reminders to go back and
add more detail later so we don't lose track of the doc feedback expressed
in this thread ... when i get more time i'll try to go back and fill
I'm trying to figure out how I can query solr for the top X results THEN
group and count only those top 50 by their owner.
I can run a query to get the top 50 results that I want.
solr/select?q=(current_position_title%3a(TEST))rows=50
I've tried Faceting but I get all results faceted not just
I suggest doing this in two queries. In the first query, retrieve the unique
ids of the top 50 documents. In the second query, just query for those ids
(e.g., q=ids:(2 13 55 62 81)), and add the facet parameters on that query.
-Michael
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Gibbons
: As Ahmet indicated, you must have a way to detect that deletions have
: happened. Marking rows as deleted with an active/inactive field is one
: way. Another way (the way that we use) is to have a delete trigger on
: the table that creates an entry in a delete tracking table.
If you have no
The CollapsingQParserPlugin currently supports facet counts that match
group.truncate. This works great for some use cases.
There are use cases though where group.facets counts are preferred. No
timetable yet on adding this feature for the CollapsingQParserPlugin.
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer
19 matches
Mail list logo
