Hi, just tried your suggestion but get this error:
And then I found the next:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18668376/solr-4-4-stopfilterfactory-and-enablepositionincrements.
I don't really know why they did so, the reason that it can create broken
token streams doesn't fit in my mind.
Hi,
I'm using the HttpSolrServer and CloudSolrServer of SolrJ to querying Solr.
Adding synonyms is no problem. But I can't delete synonyms because
SolrServer doesn't provide any delete method.
Do I overlooked something? The only way I see is using a separate
HttpClient. But then I have to ensure
So it sounds like a bug to me, doesn't it? Interned is full of complaints
about this issue and why should all we suffer because of someone, who didn't
know when and how to use this feature and as result got wrong data indexed?
Who cares about it??? And why to remove the option that is so useful
I'm experiencing the same problem.
I'm running Lucene/solr 3.5 with Webspher FEP6
My setup has multiple slaves which are replicating via master server by
doing SnapPull every 60 seconds. The exception I see in the trace log is
below
[8/23/14 16:28:46:001 UTC] 0059 SolrCore E
Sigh. Maybe I vaguely recall some vague discussion of this.
Okay, so you can get the old behavior, either by globally setting the
lucene match version in solrconfig:
luceneMatchVersion4.3/luceneMatchVersion
Or, probably best, just set the lucene match version for that specific token
filter
There is — admit that enablePositionIncrements removal was a bad idea and
restore it. Why to remove an option that has no alternatives because of
those who get wrong results with it? I really don't understand this
approach. And what should we do now, after spending lots of money on the
integration
I agree that it's a bad situation, and wasn't handled well by the Lucene
guys. They may have had good reasons, but they didn't execute a decent plan
for how to migrate existing behavior.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: heaven
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 6:51 AM
To:
The did:
If this behavior does not fit the application needs, the query parser
needs to be configured to not take position increments into account when
generating phrase queries.
Another one would be to write your own search engine maybe :)
--
View this message in context:
ZK has the list of live nodes available as a set of ephemeral nodes. You
can use /zookeeper on Solr or talk to ZK directly to get that list.
On 24 Aug 2014 03:08, Nathan Neulinger nn...@neulinger.org wrote:
Is there a way to query the 'live node' state without sending a query to
every node
Hi , I have situation and wondering is there any way to implement that.
I have a search word for e.g. Houston Texas Chicago , Is it possible to add a
fq depends on the records match.
E,g if my search has records for Huston and Texas then it should a kind of
results , ideally Houston AND
Hi all,
I have a scenario here and I'd love some advice on what my options are. We
have one Solr master and two read replicas. The replicas query the master
every 10 seconds because we need relatively quick availability of new
documents. We balance read queries across all three servers and
hello,
I posted the source code and quick installation on
http://www.solrfromscratch.com/2014/08/20/embedded-documents-in-solr/
The parser supports deeply nested maps/arrays.
Tell me if you have any problems with the download.
M.
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Jack Krupansky
What are your autowarm settings? You should be able to alleviate this by
configuring these in solrconfig.xml
1 your cache autowarm settings, particularly filterCache and
documentResultCache.
2 your newSearcher settings.
The point of all the autowarming is that these queries are executed after a
Hi,
I am using SOlr 4.6.0 with single collection/core and want to know details
about following.
1. What is the maximum number of documents which can be uploaded in a single
collection/core?
2. What is the maximum size of a document i can upload in solr without
failing?
3. Is there any way to
Hi ,
I Am using solr 4.6.1 . I have name field in my schema and I am sending
following query from solr admin UI to solr. which will find names containing
characters other english alphabets.
-name:[A TO Z] AND -name:[a TO z]
In my opinion it should return documents which do not contain name in
Sorry, before asking the question I should have done sufficient searching on
internet, I found my answer here.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8883419/solr-alphabetical-range-query
Thank You,
--
View this message in context:
16 matches
Mail list logo
