On 5/21/15, 5:26 AM, Steven White wrote:
Hi TK,
Can you share the thread you found on this WAR topic?
Steve,
Actually, that was my mistake. I still don't know why WARs are bad.
In the thread Solr 5.0, Jetty and WAR, which you started and are familiar
with,
Thanks for the feedback guys. What i am going to try now is deploying my
SOLR server on a physical machine with more RAM, and checking out this
scenario there. I have some suspicion it could well be a hypervisor issue,
but let's see. Just for the record - I've noticed those issues on a Win
2008R2
Hi,
I have a java program that sends a query to solr and get the term vector of a
document. Something like this:
SolrQuery solrQuery = new SolrQuery();
solrQuery.setRequestHandler(/tvrh);
solrQuery.setQuery(id: + id);
solrQuery.setParam(fl, textField);
solrQuery.setParam(tv.tf, true);
While trying to query a multivalued String field for multiple values, when
any one value matches the score is higher for the lower value and lower for
the higher. I swapped the value order and it had no affect so it isn't
positional. I want the score to be the same irrespective of the value
While trying to query a multivalued String field for multiple values, when
any one value matches the score is higher for the lower value and lower for
the higher. I swapped the value order and it had no affect so it isn't
positional. I want the score to be the same irrespective of the value
I accidentelly used the collections API to add a replica using async and
specified a non-existent node. Is their a way to clear out this job from
the async queue?
Thanks,
Ryan
---
This email has been scanned
Restarting the node cleared out the problem and everything recovered.
Thanks!
On 5/21/15 5:42 AM, Ramkumar R. Aiyengar wrote:
This shouldn't happen, but if it does, there's no good way currently for
Solr to automatically fix it. There are a couple of issues being worked on
to do that
Hi Angel,
a while ago I had issues with VMWare VM - somehow snapshots were created
regularly which dragged down the machine. So I think is is a good idea to
baseline the performance on physical box before moving to VMs, production boxes
or whatever is thrown at you
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
That's awesome! Thanks David. By the way, I own a copy of your terrific
book (Solr Enterprise Search Server) and am a big fan.
Alex Wang
Technical Architect
Crossview, Inc.
C: (647) 409-3066
aw...@crossview.com
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:40 PM, david.w.smi...@gmail.com [via Lucene]
I'm new on the Solr project (and Angular as well) and started attaching
patches to some of the issues from the project to get a better grasp on how
Solr is working.
I've recently done a minor patch in which I've done modifications on
Angular pages and after changing some java classes and some html
On 5/22/2015 12:46 AM, TK Solr wrote:
On 5/21/15, 5:26 AM, Steven White wrote:
Hi TK,
Can you share the thread you found on this WAR topic?
Steve,
Actually, that was my mistake. I still don't know why WARs are bad.
In the thread Solr 5.0, Jetty and WAR, which you started and are
Well, given you, Shawn, did the hard bit and created the page, I've
taken the liberty to populate it, based upon that link you gave and my
own understanding.
Feel free to edit/replace/whatever.
Upayavira
On Fri, May 22, 2015, at 03:28 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
On 5/22/2015 12:46 AM, TK Solr
On 5/22/2015 3:15 AM, Angel Todorov wrote:
Thanks for the feedback guys. What i am going to try now is deploying my
SOLR server on a physical machine with more RAM, and checking out this
scenario there. I have some suspicion it could well be a hypervisor issue,
but let's see. Just for the
On Fri, May 22, 2015, at 03:55 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
On 5/21/2015 6:21 AM, Modassar Ather wrote:
I am using Solr-5.1.0. I have an indexer class which invokes
cloudSolrClient.optimize(true, true, 1). My indexer exits after the
invocation of optimize and the optimization keeps on running
On Fri, May 22, 2015, at 03:33 PM, Marius Grama wrote:
I'm new on the Solr project (and Angular as well) and started attaching
patches to some of the issues from the project to get a better grasp on
how
Solr is working.
I've recently done a minor patch in which I've done modifications on
On 5/21/2015 6:21 AM, Modassar Ather wrote:
I am using Solr-5.1.0. I have an indexer class which invokes
cloudSolrClient.optimize(true, true, 1). My indexer exits after the
invocation of optimize and the optimization keeps on running in the
background.
Kindly let me know if it is per design
This is fixed. My SolrJ client was putting a JSON object into a multivalued
field in the SolrInputDocument. Solr returned a 0 status code but did not
add the bad object, instead it performed what looks like an atomic index as
described above. Once I removed the illegal JSON object from the
As far as debugging the java is concerned, I don't ever start Solr in
the IDE, just attach as a remote session from your IDE. This page has
instructions for IntelliJ, Eclipse and Netbeans although this last is
sparse: https://wiki.apache.org/solr/HowToContribute. I've just
updated the IntelliJ
Actually, I've recently seen very similar behavior in Solr 4.10.3, but
involving hard commits openSearcher=true, see:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7572. Of course I can't
reproduce this at will, sii.
A unit test should be very simple to write though, maybe I can get to it
19 matches
Mail list logo
