Hello all,
I am using SolrJ to do a index update on one of my collections. This
collection has a uniqueKey id field:
fields
field name=id type=string indexed=true stored=true/
field name=_version_ type=long indexed=true stored=true/
field name=name type=string indexed=true
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015, at 06:56 PM, Toke Eskildsen wrote:
Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
Also, attempting to facet across a large number of docs is going to take
some time. Perhaps you might gain some performance benefit by sharding
your index?
One should be aware that distributed
Dear Toke,
Thanks for your input. Infact my scenario is much more complex, let me give
you an example,
q=*.*fq=(country:india AND age:[25 TO 40] AND sex:male) OR (country:iran AND
income:[5 TO 9])
You can see each subquery has different parameters, I may want to limit the
first
On Thu, 2015-08-06 at 12:32 +0530, Selvam wrote:
Good day, I wanted to run a filter query (fq), say, I need to run
q=*.*fq=(country:india) OR (country:iran)limit=100
Now it may return me 100 records that might contain 70 Indians 30 Iran
records. Now how can I force to fetch 50 Indian 50
Hi,
Any suggestion will be really helpful. Kindly provide your inputs.
Thanks,
Modassar
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Modassar Ather modather1...@gmail.com
wrote:
I am using WordDelimiterFilter while indexing and searching both with the
following attributes. Parser used is edismax. Solr
How do you know those boost values? Do they come from the outside? Could
you put them in the index with the docs themselves? Then you can sort on
a field in the doc.
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015, at 04:40 AM, rachun wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to sort some docs which is about 200 or more docs.
by using
Hi all,
I'm trying to sort some docs which is about 200 or more docs.
by using bq like this..
*[bq] = product_id:L90094438^1 product_id:L90094438^3
product_id:L90094438^5 product_id:W27529923^123
product_id:W27529678^127 product_id:W27530909^133*
*[sort] = score asc*
The score that
I am attempting to put together a DocsAndPositionsEnum that can hide terms
given the payload on the term. The idea is that if a term has a particular
access control and the user does not I don't want it to be visible. I have
based this off of
Single Index Solr 4.10.4, optimized Index, 76M docs, 235GB index size.
I was analysing my solr logs and it turned out that I have some queries
which are above 30 seconds qtime while normally the qtime is below 1 second.
Looking closer about the queries it turned out that this is for
On Thu, 2015-08-06 at 13:00 +0200, Bernd Fehling wrote:
Single Index Solr 4.10.4, optimized Index, 76M docs, 235GB index size.
I was analysing my solr logs and it turned out that I have some queries
which are above 30 seconds qtime while normally the qtime is below 1 second.
Looking closer
Thanks a lot, your statement makes me feel better :-)
It feels like this behavior showed up after changing to docValues for sorting,
because before the 99 percentile for qtime was at 550ms average and 1.4 seconds
at max.
So my assumption is that the inverted index on the sort fields (when _not_
Typically such performance issues with faceting are to do with the time
spend uninverting the index before calculating the facet counts.
If you indexed the fields with docValues enabled, perhaps you could then
use them for faceting, which might improve performance.
If you are using a
Am 06.08.2015 um 14:33 schrieb Upayavira:
Typically such performance issues with faceting are to do with the time
spend uninverting the index before calculating the facet counts.
If you indexed the fields with docValues enabled, perhaps you could then
use them for faceting, which might
On Thu, 2015-08-06 at 14:32 +0200, Bernd Fehling wrote:
It feels like this behavior showed up after changing to docValues for
sorting,
because before the 99 percentile for qtime was at 550ms average and 1.4
seconds at max.
DocValues have faster startup but comes with a constant performance
On 8/6/2015 6:50 AM, Suma Shivaprasad wrote:
I was having issues since I am using a solr 4.8.1 client to talk to a 5.2.1
server. There is no API in ZKStateReader as well to add a collection to
watch in the 4.8.1 API . I assume that would have caused the
clusterstate.json to be updated?
Hi,
I am in the process of migrating my master, slave Solr infraestructure to
SolrCloud.
At the moment I have several cores inside a folder with this structure
/MyCores
/MyCores/Core1
/MyCores/Core1/conf
/MyCores/Core1/core.properties
/MyCores/Core2
/MyCores/Core2/conf
Have you looked at the collections API? It has the ability to set
properties against collections. I wonder if that'll achieve the same
thing as adding them to core.properties? I've never used it myself, but
wonder if it'll solve your issue.
Upayavira
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015, at 12:35 PM, marotosg
I was having issues since I am using a solr 4.8.1 client to talk to a 5.2.1
server. There is no API in ZKStateReader as well to add a collection to
watch in the 4.8.1 API . I assume that would have caused the
clusterstate.json to be updated?
Since I am using a third party library (which in turn
What do you mean by a custom format? As long as your custom component
is writing primitives or NamedList/SimpleOrderedMap or collections
such as List/Map, any response writer should be able to handle them.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Dmitry Kan solrexp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Solr:
Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
Also, attempting to facet across a large number of docs is going to take
some time. Perhaps you might gain some performance benefit by sharding
your index?
One should be aware that distributed faceting on String fields has a
non-trivial overhead: It is a
Also, attempting to facet across a large number of docs is going to take
some time. Perhaps you might gain some performance benefit by sharding
your index?
Upayavira
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015, at 04:48 PM, Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Bernd Fehling
Thanks for clarifying
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Shawn Heisey apa...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 8/6/2015 6:50 AM, Suma Shivaprasad wrote:
I was having issues since I am using a solr 4.8.1 client to talk to a
5.2.1
server. There is no API in ZKStateReader as well to add a collection to
I have some docs that I know i've overwritten, but this is fine because this
is caused by some duplicate docs with same data and same id.
i know of dataloss because I know that a certain doc with certain id should
be in the index but it isnt.
Upayavira wrote
Are you adding all new documents?
Do you think an all_parameters - complete_response cache is possible?
It could be initialized right before or during warmup and would not take to
much memory.
This is along the lines of Solr’s 304 capabilities. See
You should be able to use user defined properties within core.properties.
However, it sounds like you are uploading core.properties to Zookeeper. In
SolrCloud, core.properties is not uploaded to Zookeeper. You place
core.properties within your core’s top level directory and the cores are
I am using WordDelimiterFilter while indexing and searching both with the
following attributes. Parser used is edismax. Solr version is 5.2.1.
*filter class=solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory generateWordParts=1
generateNumberParts=1 catenateWords=1 catenateNumbers=1
catenateAll=1
Same results :( . Used following query
http://localhost:8983/solr/product_live/select?q=%E0%A6%B8%E0%A6%B9%E0%A6%97wt=jsonindent=truespellcheck=truespellcheck.q=%E0%A6%B8%E0%A6%B9%E0%A6%97
--
View this message in context:
I have the same question . I try to create a same name collection in
another solrcloud and copy data folds to the the new solrcloud ,but it
does not work . by the way my indexes are stored in hdfs .
Does anybody can help?
thanks
胡胜波
同程网络科技股份有限公司
Hi All,
Good day, I wanted to run a filter query (fq), say, I need to run
q=*.*fq=(country:india) OR (country:iran)limit=100
Now it may return me 100 records that might contain 70 Indians 30 Iran
records. Now how can I force to fetch 50 Indian 50 Iran records using a
single SOLR query?
On 8/6/2015 8:31 AM, adfel70 wrote:
Are you sure that this parameter concerns /update requests?
On the one hand, it says that it specides the max size of form data
(application/x-www-form-urlencoded) sent via POST. You can use POST to pass
request parameters not fitting into URL
and on the
Are you sure that this parameter concerns /update requests?
On the one hand, it says that it specides the max size of form data
(application/x-www-form-urlencoded) sent via POST. You can use POST to pass
request parameters not fitting into URL
and on the other hand, I see the my bulks are as big
hi,
While working with DIH, I tried schemaless mode, and found out it does not
work if you are indexing with DIH. I could not find any issue or reference
to this in the mailing list, even if I found it a bit surprising nobody
tried that combination so far. Did anybody tested this before?
I
On 08/05/2015 08:34 PM, Ken Krugler wrote:
Hi Shawn,
We have a different use case than the ones you covered in your response to
Robert
(below), which I wanted to call out.
We currently use the embedded server when building indexes as part of a Hadoop
workflow. The results get copied to a
(shooting in the dark)
What does your data directory looks like? File sizes, etc. And which
Operating System. 4Gb is when Windows FAT filesystem has a size
limit, but it really should not be that.
Regards,
Alex.
Solr Analyzers, Tokenizers, Filters, URPs and even a newsletter:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Bernd Fehling
bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de wrote:
Am 06.08.2015 um 14:33 schrieb Upayavira:
Typically such performance issues with faceting are to do with the time
spend uninverting the index before calculating the facet counts.
If you indexed the
Hello,
I have an issue with embedded solr or a misconfiguration
but no clue to resolve it.
Solr stopped indexing a large set of data
from a database after a while. It was running for many hours and when it
reached a size of 4GB it stopped running although we are expecting about
40GB,
Hi,
I have a case where I have a csv file on my Unix file system and not in
Hadoop file system.
For example I have abc.xml in /home/cloudera/abc.xml on my Cloudera VMware.
Now in Hadoop I go and I create a collection named test10 according to
schema of abc.xml
and using post.jar I post the
37 matches
Mail list logo
