Hi,
I have setup cross data center replication using solr 6, i want to know why
the buffer needs to be enabled on the source cluster? Even if the buffer is
not enabled, i am able to replicate the data between source and target
sites. What is the advantages of enabling the buffer on the source
Hi Mikhail,
Here is the response for
q=*:*=true:
https://gist.github.com/shadow-fox/495c50cda339e2a18550e41a524f03f0
On Tuesday 14 June 2016 01:59 AM, Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
Can you post response on q=*:*=true?
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Pranaya Behera
Zheng,
There are a few Solr FieldTypes that are basically composite fields -- a
virtual field of other fields. AFAIK they are all spatial related. You
don't necessarily need to pay attention to the fact that gps_1_coordinate
exists under the hood unless you wish to customize the options on that
I have Solr cloud configuration which we run on 4 servers. We use tomcat as
web server for solr. I have 5 zookeepers to maintain the data-replication. I
have added a jar file with custom update processor. This is in shared folder
which is mention in solr.xml**While creating the first version of
Hi Emir
Thank you for pointing out the cons of defining them in Solr config.
One of the thing I am worry about in letting clientapplication defined
the parametersis the developers will use or include unnecessary, wrong
and resource intensive parameters.
On 6/13/2016 5:50 PM, Emir
I am sorry I might have missed any replies on this. (I was looking out for
them) -
Is what I am trying to do even possible?
Thanks,
Sas
-Original Message-
From: Jamal, Sarfaraz [mailto:sarfaraz.ja...@verizonwireless.com.INVALID]
Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2016 12:43 PM
To: solr-user
Thanks everyone for the help and advice. The SolrJ exmaple makes sense to
me. The import of SOLR-8166 was kind of mind boggling to me, but maybe
I'll revisit after some time.
Tim: for context, I'm ultimately trying to create an external highlighter.
See
Can you post response on q=*:*=true?
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Pranaya Behera
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have followed what the documentation says in this page:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/BlockJoin+Faceting
>
> This is my current select
Hi,
I am working on a functionality that would require me to group documents by
a id field. I read that the ngroups feature would not work in a sharded
index.
Can someone recommend how to handle this in a sharded index?
Solr Version: 5.5
Hi - I am using graphical query parser that was introduced in Solr 6. On the
traversal filter, i have provided conditions on one of the field and it is
working fine. But i was not able to provide conditions on multiple fields.
Please find the below query.
Working - {!graph
Yes, Solr will pick that up. You won't have any replicas
though so you'll have to ADDREPLICA afterwards.
You could use the EMPTY option on the creteNodeSet
of the Collections API to create a dummy collection
to see what a no-replica shard should look like as
a model
Best,
Erick
On Mon, Jun 13,
>Two things: Here's a sample bit of SolrJ code, pulling out the DB stuff should
>be straightforward:
http://searchhub.org/2012/02/14/indexing-with-solrj/
+1
> We tend to prefer running Tika externally as it's entirely possible
> that Tika will crash or hang with certain files - and that
Hi,
I have followed what the documentation says in this page:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/BlockJoin+Faceting
This is my current select requestHandler in solrconfig.xml
explicit
10
bjqFacetComponent
And the bjqFacetComponent
This was resolved in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9015. So
this will be fixed in the soon to be released in 6.1
This does look a good candidate to be backported to a bug fix release as
well.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 7:03 AM, jpereira
Hi,
My requirement is that Solr admin should not display any sensitive information
for hackers to utilise.
I would like to suppress calls to java properties and cores (URLs given below).
Means I don't want Solr return results for these URLs.
Hi,
While trying to create an example with the Select stream decorator, I
stumbled upon a bug in the solr 6.0.1 core.
The expression I was trying to run was:
via HTTP
The request returned an error message, so I looked in the server full stack
trace:
After examining the file
Dear list,
I changed to Solr 5.5.1 - before I made some extensive tests with 5.5.0
With 5.5.1 I get the exceptions copied at the bottom of this message.
When I changed back to version 5.5.0 (on the same host) using the same
configurations for this core the creation of the core is possible.
Dear list,
I changed to Solr 5.5.1 - before I made some extensive tests with 5.5.0
With 5.5.1 I get the exceptions copied at the bottom of this message.
When I changed back to version 5.5.0 (on the same host) using the same
configurations for this core the creation of the core is possible.
I am trying to execute below query against Solr
q=cancer care facilities
=true
=edismax
=query({!lucene df=article q.op=AND v=$q},0)
but it throws below error after execution,
org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: undefined field: "v"
at
Hi Derek,
Maybe I am looking this from perspective who is working with other
peoples' setups, but I prefer when it is defined in Solr configs: I can
get sense of queries from looking at configs, you have mechanism to lock
some parameters, updates are centralized... However, it does come with
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 1:50 AM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> So to be clear we're talking about the same thing, your
> Zookeeper has a collections>>my_collection>>state.json
> ZNode. In that state.json you have information
> for all the shards, and you're saying that you had
21 matches
Mail list logo