Re: Unified highlighter returns an error when hl.fl param has undefined fields

Hi, Shawn, (Sorry, I have sent this your private email address...) Thanks for your reply. I understood what you are saying. However, at least, I think it strange that UnifiedSolrHighlighter returns the same error when choosing ", " as the field delimiter in hl.fl (e.g. hl.fl=name,%20manu).

Re: Error opening new searcher due to LockObtainFailedException

Hmmm. oddly another poster was seeing this due to permissions issues, although I don't know why that would clear up after a while. But it's something to check. Erick On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Sundeep T wrote: > Hello, > > Occasionally we are seeing errors opening

Re: write.lock file appears and solr wont open

Gah, thanks for letting us know. I can't tell you how often permissions issues have tripped me up. You're right, it does seem like there could be a better error message though. Erick On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Phil Scadden wrote: > We finally got a resolution to this

RE: write.lock file appears and solr wont open

We finally got a resolution to this - trivial but related to trying to do things by remote control. The solr process did not have the permissions to write to the core that was imported. When it tried to create the lock file it failed. The Solr code obviously assumes that file create failure

Re: edismax-with-bq-complexphrase-query not working in solrconfig.xml search handler

The problem is that the ${q} macro syntax is interpreted by Solr as a Java Property. Thus these two syntaxes conflict when we encode the macro substitution into the solrconfig.xml. See https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Configuring+solrconfig.xml The way to escape seems to be to

edismax-with-bq-complexphrase-query not working in solrconfig.xml search handler

Hi there, on Solr 6.6.0, using the built-in "techproducts" example: bin/solr start -f -e techproducts I can successfully search with URL-based bq as shown in the URL (bq setting in *bold*) below: http://localhost:8983/solr/techproducts/select?

Re: unordered autocomplete search

This should probably be a feature of the analyzing infix suggester. Right now, the fuzzy suggester is broken with the file dictionary, so we can’t use fuzzy suggestions at all. wunder Walter Underwood wun...@wunderwood.org http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) > On Sep 4, 2017, at 4:50

Re: Performance Test

That is what I do. Use production logs. I have a JMeter script that sets a constant request rate. Before each load benchmark, I reload the collection to clear the caches, then run 2000 warming queries from the logs. After that, I start the benchmark. wunder Walter Underwood

Re: How to add domain name like "ocean-solr-cd.dit.ocean.slb.com" in solr URL

On 9/4/2017 4:35 AM, LAD, SAGAR wrote: > How to add domain name like "ocean-solr-cd.dit.ocean.slb.com" in solr > URL. Could you please let me know steps to add domain name? The name by which you access Solr is not within the control of Solr. SolrCloud is the only possible exception.  Each node

Re: query with wild card with AND taking lot of time

On 9/1/2017 5:24 PM, Walter Underwood wrote: > Hmm. Solr really should convert an fq of “a AND b” to separate “a” and “b” fq > filters. That should be a simple special-case rewrite. It might take less > time to implement than explaining it to everyone. > > Well, I guess then we’d have to explain

Re: Unified highlighter returns an error when hl.fl param has undefined fields

On 9/3/2017 10:31 PM, Yasufumi Mizoguchi wrote: > I am testing UnifiedHighlighter(hl.method=unified) with Solr 6.6 and > found that the highlighter returns following error when hl.fl > parameter has undefined fields. > The error occurs even if hl.fl parameter has ", "( + ) > as a field delimiter.

Re: slow solr facet processing

On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 6:38 AM, Toke Eskildsen wrote: > On Mon, 2017-09-04 at 13:21 +0300, Ere Maijala wrote: >> Thanks for the insight, Yonik. I can confirm that #2 is true. I ran >> >> >> >> and after it completed I was able to retrieve 2000 values in 17ms. > > Very interesting. Is

Managed Resources separated by core when using configset

Hello, I've a situation where I need the same configuration (schema.xml and solrconfig.xml) for all the cores in my solr instance, and I can manage this with the same configset. BUT, in my case the synonyms and stopwords should be managed by tenant/core (each tenant is a solr core), and can be

Re: Performance Test

Get the raw logs from normal use, script out something to replicate the searches and have it fork to as many cores as the solr server has is what I'd do. > On Sep 4, 2017, at 5:26 AM, Daniel Ortega wrote: > > I would recommend you Solrmeter cloud > > This fork

Re: slow solr facet processing

Toke Eskildsen kirjoitti 4.9.2017 klo 13.38: On Mon, 2017-09-04 at 13:21 +0300, Ere Maijala wrote: Thanks for the insight, Yonik. I can confirm that #2 is true. I ran and after it completed I was able to retrieve 2000 values in 17ms. Very interesting. Is this on spinning disks or SSD? Is

Re: unordered autocomplete search

You probably can override AnalyzingInfixSuggester.finishQuery(Builder, boolean) where you can rip clauses from builder and change TermQueries/ PrefixQuery to FuzzyQueries. Let me know how it works, please. On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Niraj Aswani wrote: > Hi Mikhali,

Re: unordered autocomplete search

Hi Mikhali, Thank you very much for your quick response. This does seem to fix the issue of unordered words in the autocomplete, however, then I loose the capability of matching misspelled words. Is there anything that can be done to combine the functionality of the two? Regards, Niraj On

Re: slow solr facet processing

On Mon, 2017-09-04 at 13:21 +0300, Ere Maijala wrote: > Thanks for the insight, Yonik. I can confirm that #2 is true. I ran > > > > and after it completed I was able to retrieve 2000 values in 17ms. Very interesting. Is this on spinning disks or SSD? Is your index data cached in memory? What I

RE: Solr uses lots of shared memory!

Hello Kevin, Rick, These are interesting points indeed. But this thread is about shared memory, not virtual memory. Any value higher than 0 for MALLOC_ARENA_MAX only reduces virtual memory consumption, from 22 GB to 16 GB. There are no differences in shared memory nor resident memory.

How to add domain name like "ocean-solr-cd.dit.ocean.slb.com" in solr URL

Hi Team, How to add domain name like "ocean-solr-cd.dit.ocean.slb.com" in solr URL. Could you please let me know steps to add domain name? Regards _ [Email_CBE.gif]Sagar Lad | Capgemini Technology Services India Limited | Pune Schlumberger, Sogeti

Re: slow solr facet processing

Yonik Seeley kirjoitti 1.9.2017 klo 17.03:> On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 9:17 AM, Ere Maijala wrote: >> I spoke a bit too soon. Now I see why I didn't see any improvement from >> facet.method=uif before: its performance seems to depend heavily on how many >> facets are

Re: unordered autocomplete search

The first question is, "sourceLocation">test.dict makes sense? Then, for me, it looks like a case for AnalyzingInfixLookupFactory https://lucidworks.com/2015/03/04/solr-suggester/ rather than - The FuzzyLookupFactory that creates suggestions for misspelled words in fields. On Mon, Sep

Re: Performance Test

I would recommend you Solrmeter cloud This fork supports solr cloud: https://github.com/idealista/solrmeter/blob/master/README.md Disclaimer: This fork was developed by idealista, the company where I work El El lun, 4 sept 2017 a las 11:18, Selvam Raman escribió: > Hi All, >

Performance Test

Hi All, which is the best tool for solr perfomance test. I want to identify how much load my solr could handle and how many concurrent users can query on solr. Please suggest. -- Selvam Raman "லஞ்சம் தவிர்த்து நெஞ்சம் நிமிர்த்து"

unordered autocomplete search

Hi, I am using solr 5.5.4. I would like to perform an unordered autocomplete search however it seems that it only suggests phrases that start with my term in the query. For example, in my dictionary I have, *lamp desk* When searching for the term "lamp", it is able to show the the suggestion